Skip to main content

Now that Weaver and K-Line are gone, does it concern you that one of the big 2 might go next? Much larger companies have gone under like GM so it could happen.  This question may be especially relevant to those invested in high cost electronic operating systems,namely DCS and Legacy. Some food for thought.

 

Dale H

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Dale H:

Now that Weaver and K-Line are gone, does it concern you that one of the big 2 might go next? Much larger companies have gone under like GM so it could happen.  

 

Dale H

GM went under because they were building cars no one wanted to buy. This is quite the opposite of at least one of the "big two" o guage manufacturers.

I know I have certainly been contributing heavily their survival the last few years and I was really hoping the 'big two' would stick around for a while longer. Unfortunately my LHS had just started to carry Weaver a few months ago and I hadn't gotten to purchase any of their products. The 'big two' had already cleaned me out for the time being, probably at least until the fall catalogs.

Dale,

I do not see either of the big two calling it quits anytime in the foreseeable future. There are still quite a few smaller companies out there to watch. I will not mention names to avoid seeing this thread deleted.

 

At no other time in my life have I watched so many companies associated with our hobby close their doors. Granted the ones that are still with us changed with the times. There are those who are struggling along. These are the one's who will be gone within the next decade.

Last edited by Prewar Pappy

Hobby's go through this....

 

Even in video games, there was PONG, Atari, magnevox, Coleco, Sega, Intellivision, NIntendo, Microsoft (Xbox), and Playstation (Sony).

 

After a number of years,  the last 3 are the only ones left... Either the markets fall, or the they go under for a myriad of reasons......

 

Just an analogy that shows it happens to lots of industries.  Based on many variables.  Agree with all the above... But it is a reality.

 

Ben

With Weaver winding down, there already was a lack of suppliers, for replacement/new

trucks...Lionel archbars dried up, then Weaver's, now Weaver's Bettendorfs and

Roller Bearings.....others on here beside myself were concerned about archbars

disappearing for their projects.  GM just wanted to sell loaded up, big cars.  Public

is/was buying (I am buying) reported reliable fuel efficient cars.  I am not sure the big two care much about the "details", the small stuff, in the market, or are going to

be able, or want to, provide them at the best price (re: Lionel archbars).

What we did get from K-Line and Weaver, and Williams, and even Industrial Rail, etc., was innovation, new prototypes.  True, some of us are in niches, out of the mainstream, if that is what it is.

Every time there is some kind of shake up in the hobby"The sky is falling" i don't see any shortage of trains,track or anything else in our hobby well past most of our lifetimes. As far as the big two I don't see them going anywhere any time soon.  Lionel is celebrating there 115th anaversery and Mike is going on 35 years of building his own train empire!  I can see one of the smaller train company's dropping out before the big two will! 

Unless I missed it, Weaver is not closing based on  their viability as a business.  The owner simply wanted to retire.  I'm sad that they are closing, but not because of their absence in the hobby market.  I don't know how many folks worked at Weaver, but i assume many are now having to seek employment elsewhere. I just hope everyone impacted  is able to make the transition to new emplyment without too much grief. That is the sad part of this closing. There are more trains out there than most of us could ever use in a lifetime.  

 

Ed 

Bachmann is probably bigger than Lionel and MTH combined when you consider their world wide sales.  Bachmann trains are everywhere.  Bachmann is already active in two segments of the USA O gauge market with its On30 trains and Williams brand.  I could see Bachmann moving into other O gauge USA markets as well.  There will be plenty of new trains  for everyone.

 

There are also plenty of new in the box trains on the secondary market.  I have seen piles of Weaver models new in the box at recent train shows.  

 

Joe

 

 

....Weaver is not closing based on  their viability as a business.  The owner simply wanted to retire.... 

One does not just retire and walk away from a viable business. Williams sold for the price of an expensive home on the east end of Long Island, but it still was sold. There is probably another story as to why what is being done at Weaver is the option of choice.

Last edited by bigo426

"No control over what happens in the hobby field.........

I have more hobby stuff than I can use in a life time.

Something I need to spend ZERO seconds worrying about."

 

  Ain't that the truth. I got more stuff in three different scales than I need to model the rest of my life.Just have to decide which to go with :> .....DaveB

Kader Industries, Bachmanns parent company could buy Lionel or MTH if an opportunity was to happen and if their owner felt there was a financial upside. Kader Industries is the largest electric train company in the world when you consider their brands in N gauge, HO gauge, and O gauge. It wasn't to long ago that Kader Industries was manufacturing Lionel and Atlas products before they acquired Bachmann.

OK guys...keep this on topic.  The subject at hand has nothing to do with how long the U.S. has been a nation or for that matter how long Lionel has been around....

 

By the way... sometimes an owner of a company REALLY does want to retire.  I can assure you without elaborating that Weaver (Joe) is not closing because the business was not viable and making a profit.... 

 

Alan

Wow; that was certainly a ride out into the woods.

 

Back to Weaver: it is nice to hear from an informed someone (Alan) say that the business was viable and profitable. That is encouraging, if only in a non-specific way. Perhaps a competent someone or group of competent someones will purchase the business and

continue its existence - not as a museum piece, but as a healthy, evolving manufacturing enterprise.

 

The loss of the Weaver brass steamer line bothers me greatly, though I got the impression that it may have been shrinking (at least) already. Just my thoughts; no facts to back it up. Of course, the brass pieces weren't made in Pennsylvania, anyway - but I don't live anywhere near PA, myself, so...I didn't really care.

 

Weaver was also accessible. THAT is valuable.

Originally Posted by OGR Ad Man:

 

 

By the way... sometimes an owner of a company REALLY does want to retire.  I can assure you without elaborating that Weaver (Joe) is not closing because the business was not viable and making a profit.... 

 

Alan

 

Exactly, I remember when Madison Hardware in New York was closing simply because the owner(s) had decided it was time to retire. This does not signal a problem with the hobby as a whole.

 

 

Originally Posted by Ed Walsh:

 I don't know how many folks worked at Weaver, but i assume many are now having to seek employment elsewhere. I just hope everyone impacted  is able to make the transition to new emplyment without too much grief. That is the sad part of this closing. There are more trains out there than most of us could ever use in a lifetime.  

 

Ed 

Ed, there are currently 7 employees counting Joe. They all plan to stay til the end. All are busy filling orders, and doing final assembly of whatever rolling stock is left. 

Don

Originally Posted by bigo426:
 

....Weaver is not closing based on  their viability as a business.  The owner simply wanted to retire.... 

One does not just retire and walk away from a viable business. Williams sold for the price of an expensive home on the east end of Long Island, but it still was sold. There is probably another story as to why what is being done at Weaver is the option of choice.

I did, back in 2000, after 15 years.  My music career was starting to take off.

I could afford to, so I closed the business, and sold the assets; manufacturing machines, building, and other related equipment.   I had a few serious bites to buy me out, but all of the deals required me to stay on, hands on, for a year.   I was not interested in that.

 

So I sold of the pieces and parts, so to speak, to others in the same industry I was in.

 

There's a lot more technical stuff, obviously, that went into what I did, but that's the gist of it.  I just wanted to do something else.  The business was fine.

Now that MTH is in bed with Lionel making the Lionel Corporation standard gauge stuff, they're almost like the same company with different names.

 

And I'll bet each company dosen't wanna step on each others toes by coming out with the same products.

The compettion between both companies is dead.

I mean, look at both of their catalogs.  What one company makes the other won't.

I'm surpized that nobody has raised this collaboration as being questionable.

No doubt its legal but it sure cuts down on the ability of the consumer to choose between buying the best of the same type train locomotive or car from either manufacturer.

Originally Posted by riki:

Now that MTH is in bed with Lionel making the Lionel Corporation standard gauge stuff, they're almost like the same company with different names.

 

And I'll bet each company dosen't wanna step on each others toes by coming out with the same products.

The compettion between both companies is dead.

I mean, look at both of their catalogs.  What one company makes the other won't.

I'm surpized that nobody has raised this collaboration as being questionable.

No doubt its legal but it sure cuts down on the ability of the consumer to choose between buying the best of the same type train locomotive or car from either manufacturer.

Your kidding, right?  (You are right about the tinplate collaboration, but that doesn't make it illegal or even wrong)

 

Lionel and MTH went through that phase when they were continuously offering similar products (or at least head-liner products) to one another in each catalog. 

 

Some of that was in the "mid level" expansion years when there was much more offered than the late 90's, but less than the gazillion products in each catalog that we are at now.  Some people even assumed Lionel's shift in catalog release month over the last 5 years (maybe more) was to prevent MTH from offering the same thing in their next catalog.  For quite a few years the Lionel catalog used to come out around January/July, only more recently have they shifted into March-April and Sept-Oct.

 

More recently, remember this little series called the Heritage program?  Each manufacturer made a whole heck of a lot of those models (I am not about to cross check them all, but there has to be quite a bit of overlap there).

 

-Dave

Originally Posted by riki:

Now that MTH is in bed with Lionel making the Lionel Corporation standard gauge stuff, they're almost like the same company with different names.

 

And I'll bet each company dosen't wanna step on each others toes by coming out with the same products.

The compettion between both companies is dead.

I mean, look at both of their catalogs.  What one company makes the other won't.

I'm surpized that nobody has raised this collaboration as being questionable.

No doubt its legal but it sure cuts down on the ability of the consumer to choose between buying the best of the same type train locomotive or car from either manufacturer.

LOL, Lionel and MTH are NOT in bed with each other. The Tinplate agreement between the two companies came about as a result of MTH lawsuit against Lionel.

 

   Bill T.

 

 

I just again flipped through , and did several times prior to the close of ordering periods, the recent catalogs acquired in April.  Barring a few passenger cars, what in there was new? The steam locomotives in both look like repros both have offered before.  What is a new prototype?  For a while there, they weren't both dancing in the same small circle.  This catalog we offer the Big Boy, next catalog you offer the Big Boy, next catalog we offer the streamlined Hudson, next after that you do....!!!!!!!!!!!

Break outta that mold!  Plenty of trains?  Sure, plenty of the same old same old....

I've already addressed parts....this is why Weaver's loss is of concern.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×