Skip to main content

Hello. I have been wanting a scale GS-4 for a long time now and have found that the older Williams brass models would be the most realistic for me price-wise. How detailed and accurate are they? For me 'good enough' is good enough for me, I am not expecting the quality to be on par with the latest Lionel or MTH model. Any glaring detail or paint issues? Does anybody have any pics? 

Thanks

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Wow, something non DT&I for once? 

 

From the pictures I've seen it's not a bad looking engine, but as I'm sure you know.  I don't have one myself

 

If I recall right, I've read the later Williams brass locos were good runners and the price is attractive too for a decent model.  As you said, not up to the standards of the newer models, but not bad for something under $700.

As you might know, I'm a Milwaukee person but I grew up in southern California and saw and liked SP and Pacific Electric. My first train ride was in 1953 on the Daylight from LA to San Francisco with a GS-4 pulling. I bought two Williams brass engines just to sit on a self and admire. The GS-4 Daylight and SP's Cab forward. I have run the cab forward but not the GS-4. I paid less than $400 for the Daylight, a great deal in my book. If you need pics I will take some tomorrow for you. I think they are way underpriced and a really nice engine. There might be some small detail that's been improved on the newer engines but I really like my GS-4. Don

I think you will be well pleased. Back in the days of Williams brass, Williams took some flak for the glossy finish on his steamers. While I agreed for the most part, I think the gloss was a plus on the GS-4, having seen the real thing up close several times. Then too, the lack of detail by today’s expectations might not be as disappointing on a streamlined engine. Mine was a smooth runner, and a tad quieter than the N&W J made the following year because of its “floating” motor mount. That was a potential engineering weakness, however, but you should be OK if you don’t intend to drop the loco on its side from some height. The GS-4 didn’t include a lead weight in the boiler, but I had no difficulty adding one. It then pulled very well. Bottom line, when I walk past the shelf, this engine pleases me more than the more detailed ones that followed.

It was a sufficiently hot item when it originally came out that $1200 was not unheard of. It should do what you want, but I concur - 350 max.  The Weaver might be a better choice in the same price ballpark.  I have one of those, and it parks well next to my scale Max Gray.  The tender is incorrect, but not objectionably so.

Lee, these engines were made way over ten years ago. They were the second try for Williams with brass engines. The first were terrible, and I mean terrible. Later they came out with the cabforward, Daylight, and four or five other brass engines. These were good. Many people had them reworked to run smoother but they were good locomotives right out of the box. I paid a little over a thousand dollars for my cabforward about the time Williams was running into money troubles. With brass they got in over their heads. They blew out the cabforwards for about $500 not making the early buyers very happy. Now you know the rest of the story. Don

FTR, 1989 and 1990 were the "Big Bang" years for Williams Brass. Their 1989 catalog offered a Pacific in several roads, Atlantic, UP Big Boy, and the SP GS-4 Daylight. The 1990 catalog included the Camelback, Mikado,  Niagara, SP Cab Forward, and the N&W J. In hind sight, perhaps too much too soon for a market that hadn't seen anything like it in three rail. 

 

I took delivery of my GS-4 as modified by Scale Tin Rail in November of 1989. 

 

 The GS-4 was about the last streamlined steam loco I HAD to have in my collection. The Williams was just too small and the tender is so wrong.....The MTH was a little better but wrong tender again in the RK line. I waited long enough and got this Williams brass unit w/o box for under $200. I am VERY happy with it....only run on my test set up....but I am a conventional runner and it seems fine. Detail is great and correct tender is a plus. 

 

 

There are many more pics in link below......thanks

http://public.fotki.com/DaveVan51/my-trains/

Thanks for the photos.  The drivers look a bit small, but the boiler and tender look accurate.  I have a "J" and am very pleased - and my hobby is 2-rail scale, with no undersize models allowed.  I also have the Williams PRR T1, and am really pleased with that speedster.  I think we 2- railed 20 of them.

Originally Posted by AMCDave:

 

 The GS-4 was about the last streamlined steam loco I HAD to have in my collection. The Williams was just too small and the tender is so wrong.....The MTH was a little better but wrong tender again in the RK line. I waited long enough and got this Williams brass unit w/o box for under $200. I am VERY happy with it....only run on my test set up....but I am a conventional runner and it seems fine. Detail is great and correct tender is a plus. 

 

 

There are many more pics in link below......thanks

http://public.fotki.com/DaveVan51/my-trains/

The two models pictured are NOT "scale size" models! Look at the cross head guides on the 4449, and you will see that they bear no relation to the real 4449.

 

The "scale" model produced by Williams, way back in the '80s was VERY accurate. That Williams model is what the original poster is enquiring about. 

The two models pictured are NOT "scale size" models!


Sorry....I never tried to imply the MTH RK J 611 was scale in any way. The photo was from an old post comparing the two locos.  I did not know there were two different 'scale' Williams SP GS-4 locos either......For that matter I don't care. I was happy with mine....and thought it was asked about.  Don's loco does look different than mine....so what do I have???? It is Williams for sure......

Originally Posted by SantaFe158:

Wow, something non DT&I for once? 

 

From the pictures I've seen it's not a bad looking engine, but as I'm sure you know.  I don't have one myself

 

If I recall right, I've read the later Williams brass locos were good runners and the price is attractive too for a decent model.  As you said, not up to the standards of the newer models, but not bad for something under $700.

 

Yea, 15 DT&I EMD diesels gets kind of boring after a while 

 

Thanks everyone for the info, you all have convinced me. It's a slippery slope now, I also like the Williams brass N&W 611....

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×