Skip to main content

I need advice concerning placing my amp and volt meters.

I’m constructing a 45-power-block layout on which I hope to operate DCS, Legacy/TMCC and conventional simultaneously, although I’m unlikely to operate more than 3 trains at once. I’m powering my layout with two PW ZW-275s: one will power an MTH TIU (and DCS controller); the second will drive a Legacy PowerMaster and Cab 2 base and controller. Track power will be “allocated” to each block from either the TIU or the Power Master through DPDT toggles.

I plan to install either PSX ACs or Airpex Snapacs at the transformer outputs (and I think Gunrunnerjohn also recommends a higher-amp breaker for the common ground) and TVSs in each block where the track voltage leads connect to the track.

I understand that amp and volt meters are installed between the transformer and the track, but in this instance where a “chain” of other devices also intervene between the transformer and the track, I’m uncertain where to place the meters. Between the transformers and the PSX ACs/Airpax Snapacs?   Between these breakers and the TIU and/or PowerMaster?   Between the latter and the DPDTS distributing the power to the blocks?    It seems to me that my concern should be what is happening immediately at the ZW outputs and that, accordingly, the meters should be installed immediately at the transformer outputs before leads even reaching the breakers, but perhaps I don’t understand the big picture.

A second question: are 10-amp DPDTs appropriate for my purpose?

Advice please, and thanks for all responses.

Bill

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No matter what devices you are send volts and Amps through-you are monitoring the Source.
But, you could monitor between the track and all those other items

if you wanted to see the actual values getting to the track.

Just remember

voltage is measured across both + & -

and Amperage is measured through only one leg   - & - or + & +

I recently added a clip on amp meter to monitor my 3 Lionel LW transformers, details below

Picture of the $25 Amprobe Clamp on Ammeter, 0 to 25 amps, note the compressed area of 0 to 5  amps on the left of the scale.

IMG_1690

To amplify this area to 5 times its size, I made a simple 5 loop wire doughnut and rapped it with electrical tape.  That changes the max reading from 25 amp max to max of 5 amps for the whole range of the meter.

Five coil wire doughnut installed and meter is rotated to each of three LW transformers

IMG_1711

Picture of 5 turn coil, LW transformer and Amprobe clip on ammeter, reading scale for 5 turn coil in service are the big numbers added on with taped on numbers.

IMG_1694

With a clip on ammeter I only need one meter and can move it to each LW.  They all now have a 5 coil donuts.

IMG_1698

I normally do not need it but yesterday, the 6 amp circuit breaker was throwing when running 3 trains on one loop with my relayed system.  If I had read the meter I would have seen the problem coming.

Charlie

Last edited by Choo Choo Charlie

GRJ,

Thanks again for your follow-up.   

Regarding single-pole vs double-pole, I was under the impression that to minimize DCS issues, I should be using a "star" wiring system with both hot and common wires of equal length to/from the power blocks, and equal paths through switches or other "interference" (i.e., both hot and common passing through my toggles) before the commons indeed come together at the TIU.

Thus, I assumed the double-pole toggles.    I will appreciate your futher help on this.

Bill   

To add on to this discussion, I would like to wire in an ammeter into my control board. It's a cheap analog ammeter from amazon, and I've read that you need to have some sort of shunt across the terminals and that you can't just put the ammeter in line with the hot wire.

I'm not sure I understand why, when I use my fluke I literally just pull off the hot post and stick it in between the post and the hot wire to read amps.

The reason is that the meter movement (the tiny coil and armature) that causes the needle to move starts out as a very sensitive circuit, not capable of handling a large current. The shunt, which is a bar of metal, designed for the particular application, "shunts" or bypasses most of the current, leaving the small remainder of the current to pass through the meter movement.

More technically, the shunt is designed to create a certain voltage drop across the terminals, and the meter movement responds to a voltage in that small range.

Most ammeters have a shunt, either hidden inside or visible on the outside, mounted across the terminals. By changing the size of the shunts, the same movement can be designed to handle different current ranges.

We often use a flow of water as an analogy to electrical theory. In this case, picture a river with a fast -moving heavy flow. Then picture an island with one large stream on one side, and a small stream on the other. If you know the ratio of the two streams, it would be easy to measure the total flow by measuring the small stream and doing some math.

If the ammeter you bought has a stated rating, then it is assumed that the shunt is already installed.  Can you check and tell us the advertised rating, or show us a picture?

Last edited by Arthur P. Bloom

If the meter you purchased has a built in shunt, it should be measurable with an ohm meter…



I did a quick search and found no useful information for determining if a ammeter is pre-shunted.
seems there is no designated markings to advise the end user.

The information states a “high current” requirement..but does not define a value for “high current”.

I built a device to read Amps for my tracks because the Z-4000 I bought was determined unrepairable-the display was fried-it reads nothing and everything.
but the outputs are clean and accurate-

so I built my Ammeter so I could see real time current draw.

it’s worked almost 10 years..and I got it for a great price.
I've since rebuilt it and added SPST to control each mainline feeder.

I use a bus bar from an electric panel for distribution..all together I spent less than $50 on it.

Now, I’m curious about the shunt and determination what value it is  

EACBA1F7-A8AC-43FB-98A6-32EFC829915B

Attachments

Images (1)
  • EACBA1F7-A8AC-43FB-98A6-32EFC829915B
@bhoerger posted:

GRJ,

Thanks again for your follow-up.   

Regarding single-pole vs double-pole, I was under the impression that to minimize DCS issues, I should be using a "star" wiring system with both hot and common wires of equal length to/from the power blocks, and equal paths through switches or other "interference" (i.e., both hot and common passing through my toggles) before the commons indeed come together at the TIU.

Thus, I assumed the double-pole toggles.    I will appreciate your futher help on this.

Bill   

I use a star pattern with some switchable track blocks... I only use single pole switches and switch the hot on and off to regulate the block power. No problems seen with the DCS signal.

LT1Poncho,

Thank you for your further information. 

Do you bring your "returns" back more or less on the same path as your "hot" wire and more-or-less the same length/distance but route them directly to a common bus at your control panel or power station and simply by-pass the power-block toggle?

Might I ask the general dimensions of your layout?

Thanks, again.

Bill

@bhoerger posted:

LT1Poncho,

Thank you for your further information.

Do you bring your "returns" back more or less on the same path as your "hot" wire and more-or-less the same length/distance but route them directly to a common bus at your control panel or power station and simply by-pass the power-block toggle?

Might I ask the general dimensions of your layout?

Thanks, again.

Bill

My layout is 10x12. I run hot and common from the output of my TIU to a distribution block in the center under the layout. I then run hot and common (together) to the track blocks. If a certain block is to be shut off by a single pole switch, I run that track blocks hot hot wire to a relay. The single pole switch then activates or deactivates the relay. This way the wires from the distribution block to the track blocks are similar in length as per DCS suggestions. The wires would be much longer if they themselves went to to the single pole switch. Relays help keep the wire lengths in check. Hope that makes sense.

Last edited by LT1Poncho

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×