As a member of the Maine 3 Railers I can say that simply putting a layer of green felt under the track makes a big difference.
I have my Lionel Fastrack laid on Homosote sound board and have no trouble at all with sound. The trains themselves make more noise than the track does especially with engine revving, chuffing, etc.
Steve, Lady and Tex
My new layout has 1/2" Plywood, 1" Blue Styrofoam covered in an Indoor/Outdoor no backing carpet from Home Depot. My Fasttrack is no noisier than my K line Smap Track was. I was just running 2 trains at once and is was not Noisy.
Attachments
I've tried most of what is mentioned. What I am using now is homosote top of my plywood and homosote under my plywood. It works very well but is expensive on a big layout. I'm down to 4x8 right now and the track is screwed down. If it wasn't expensive, I would fill the underneath of the tracks with realistic water
As for the other poster stating hollow rails. I read about 10 years ago that someone was inserting weed wacker line into the rails. That just seems too much work.
BTW, steamies are louder than diesels on fastrack.
No, don't get Great Stuff anywhere near your FasTrack. Swafford's method is tedious, but effective. I use 2mm, closed cell foam which is used for laminate floor underlayment for sound abatement. The cork has similar sound properties. We had a cutting party for the pieces with the family. I made templates of the bays and traced them on to the material. Then I used a hot glue gun with a few dabs to fasten them.
I also cover the deck with the same material.
I use the Decibel 10th app from the app store(free) on an iPad and get a 23db sound reduction compared to track on wood and about 18db compared to track on homosote.
Now, most of the sound comes from hollow cars like passenger cars and box cars.
When I had Fastrack and was tackling the noise problem I had no problems using Great Stuff in a type of assembly line process to make, say, 25 feet of it overnight. It did more than any single other thing else to cut noise.
My new layout has 1/2" Plywood, 1" Blue Styrofoam covered in an Indoor/Outdoor no backing carpet from Home Depot. My Fasttrack is no noisier than my K line Smap Track was. I was just running 2 trains at once and is was not Noisy.
Larry
Like your passing sidings and your yard.
awesome layout!!
Happy Railroading
Malcolm(Popi)
No, don't get Great Stuff anywhere near your FasTrack. Swafford's method is tedious, but effective. I use 2mm, closed cell foam which is used for laminate floor underlayment for sound abatement. The cork has similar sound properties. We had a cutting party for the pieces with the family. I made templates of the bays and traced them on to the material. Then I used a hot glue gun with a few dabs to fasten them.
I also cover the deck with the same material.
I use the Decibel 10th app from the app store(free) on an iPad and get a 23db sound reduction compared to track on wood and about 18db compared to track on homosote.
Now, most of the sound comes from hollow cars like passenger cars and box cars.
I'm curious to know the Decibel rating for the locomotives with sound is, let's say, at a mid range or normal volume level. I bet the noise level would over power any track noise present.
Steve, Lady and Tex
No, don't get Great Stuff anywhere near your FasTrack. Swafford's method is tedious, but effective. I use 2mm, closed cell foam which is used for laminate floor underlayment for sound abatement. The cork has similar sound properties. We had a cutting party for the pieces with the family. I made templates of the bays and traced them on to the material. Then I used a hot glue gun with a few dabs to fasten them.
I also cover the deck with the same material.
I use the Decibel 10th app from the app store(free) on an iPad and get a 23db sound reduction compared to track on wood and about 18db compared to track on homosote.
Now, most of the sound comes from hollow cars like passenger cars and box cars.
I'm curious to know the Decibel rating for the locomotives with sound is, let's say, at a mid range or normal volume level. I bet the noise level would over power any track noise present.
Steve, Lady and Tex
Long ago I post a long thread about my results. I got a DB meter and tested everything. At its worse, the noise from Fastrack was louder than the noise of the chuffing on my steamers. All the measures I took, together, brought it down so that the sound (what I wanted to hear) was hearable over the nise (sound I don't want to hear). I just don't remember the details.
Cell foam and/or cork will be good to place underneath the fastrack roadbed itself. But did you ever consider putting some pillow batting that can be purchased at a sewing store? This stuff is real light and fluffy. My wife uses it when she makes padded items. You can stuff it lightly inside the roadbed. DO NOT PACK IT. Like fiberglass insulation, it works best when it is not compressed. It might reduce any hollow sounds coming from inside the roadbed.
This thread
https://ogrforum.com/t...33#26912068693009933
May be helpful.
I measured 60 dB on my fastrack layout. Doesn't seem too loud to me.
Maybe you guys should try operating in a vacuum!
Eight years using Fastrack, creating over a dozen different displays, I've tried everything to make the sound less offensive for those wearing hearing aids in our home. Plush carpeting is probably the easiest solution. Gluing cork or any other sound absorption directly under the road bed works well, but it is very time consuming and can add a lot of unneeded weight if you're building a mobile display.
A neighbor tossed a lot of the closed cell foam carpet padding away this past year so I'm trying that on our Christmas display which uses a cookie cutter design. It's working alright but not as well as other methods.
The biggest issue with Fastrack is the void created between the plastic roadbed and the sub roadbed, which causes the plastic to resonate. The best results I've achieved attempting to neutralize the resonating characteristics of the plastic roadbed is when floating the track over plush carpeting, Buffalo Snow or any other soft, low density material. As long as that void exists you're going to have some excess noise. It may be less noticeable depending on the sub roadbed used and other variables in the landscaping, but it's still there.
This is fascinating reading. It seems to me that the problem is not so much the transmission of noise, but that the plastic roadbed vibrates. As Lee says, like a violin. So you have three choices:
1) Try to absorb the sound, which is what most of you are doing when adding carpet, insulation, etc, either directly under the track, or by adding scenery. The problem with this approach is while you are limiting the sound transmitted to the layout table, you still have the Roadbed transmitting sound through the air. It is basically an inefficient, but effective speaker cone.
2) Try clamping the track to something more massive, like the benchwork, in order to prevent the track from vibrating. The problems here are its tough to get a truly solid acoustic connection, and even if you do, its only through the edges. So the rest of the roadbed is still free to vibrate.
3) Change the frequency at which the roadbed vibrates to well below the frequency you can hear. The way to do that is to substantially increase the mass of the plastic roadbed. Note, you can't just have weight attached to the roadbed in a few places, it has to be in intimate contact with all of the roadbed. So fill the underside with hydrocal, or plaster, or sculptamold filled with sand (or lead shot), etc.
This is fascinating reading. It seems to me that the problem is not so much the transmission of noise, but that the plastic roadbed vibrates. As Lee says, like a violin. So you have three choices:
3) Change the frequency at which the roadbed vibrates to well below the frequency you can hear. The way to do that is to substantially increase the mass of the plastic roadbed. Note, you can't just have weight attached to the roadbed in a few places, it has to be in intimate contact with all of the roadbed. So fill the underside with hydrocal, or plaster, or sculptamold filled with sand (or lead shot), etc.
That's an interesting idea. Most folks think in terms of putting something soft under the track to absorb sound. No. 3 here is the opposite, putting something solid inside the plastic roadbed. This seems like it may be a better approach. Not sure of the expense, but turning over the Fastrack and pouring that plastic stuff used to make water on a layout might work. It would self-level and then harden, and create a solid roadbed. It would be interesting to try that, and then lay the solid roadbed track on an absorbent material, and see what happens.
As I have mentioned before.................Midwest Cork glued to the underside/inside the roadbed will reduce the sound substantially. To my ear, the sound (noise) is reduced 50%.
Regards,
Frank
I did a similar thing with Woodland Scenics Foam Roadbed. Can't say if it's better or worse than the cork, but it did a pretty good job of quieting things down.
Gilly
If you want noisy, run a floor layout on laminate flooring!
John Sethian's suggestion to use sand is probably a good one to try. If you build up the mass with an inert material like sand, that should effectively stop vibration. Other solid materials inside (with the exception of pillow batting) have their own vibration point and can transmit that vibration, unlike sand. Plus sand is cheaper and can be picked up if you do not like the results. Increasing mass has always been one method to reduce sound vibration. In the old days of audio turntables, instead of isolating the turntable with springs to reduce vibration, some companies (Empire, for example) made extremely heavy platters and solid bases that were heavy, and high mass tone arms. This not only reduced vibration but also the heavy platters kept the turntable speed consistent. The platter was turned by a belt to isolate the motor vibration. I'd try increasing the mass if I had Fastrack.
Found this on another model train forum. Person claims it is the best way to attenuate noise using carpet foam.
I silenced my fastrak by selling it and buying Atlas.
fred
Has anyone tried using Automotive style Rubberized Undercoating directly sprayed on the Underside of Fastrack? Not the style that remains Goo-like of course and not sprayed where you may need to work like Electrical connections etc. You could easily Mask off these areas as well as the Roadbed edges.
Drummer3 posted:Found this on another model train forum. Person claims it is the best way to attenuate noise using carpet foam.
That picture is older than dirt. That was from a old layout I had. That was night and day compared to using foam board alone. You can take the foam board and throw it in the garbage for sound deadening. I have one idea I know would work but the amount of money spent to do it, You could by quieter track and switches a 2 to 4 times over.
Stephen K posted:Has anyone tried using Automotive style Rubberized Undercoating directly sprayed on the Underside of Fastrack? Not the style that remains Goo-like of course and not sprayed where you may need to work like Electrical connections etc. You could easily Mask off these areas as well as the Roadbed edges.
You would ruin a lot of FT doing that and would ruin the resale value of the track.
The suggestions will help a bit but the real problem is that the rail is a hollow U shape that is mounted to the hard plastic base with little pins that stick up to hold the track in place and there are small holes underneath, and cracks for sound to get out the top. This acts as a speaker chamber that amplifies the sounds of the wheels rolling over the rails. Put as much insulation as you want underneath but the real noise is coming from inside the rails not underneath the rail bed.
No other track system on the market is as noisy as Fastrack. If the sound bothers you sell it, it is expensive stuff and buy anything else most much cheaper that are much quieter. I have the K-Line Supersnap and Gargraves and the old Lionel 0-27 and use all these on both home layouts and for several portable layout setups each year, any of these works very well and on the right carpet or padded base without screws into the plywood underneath. All of these tracks are very very quiet.
IF you do not care about hearing your engine sounds and do not mind the roar of trains then keep the Fastrack and enjoy the rail noise that is the only sound you will hear, nothing else when trains run at any functional speed.
If you enjoy hearing the sounds of your trains the bells whistles and other sounds and want to run trains at normal speeds then get rid of the Fastrack and get anything else on the market on a good underlay or carpet to keep the noise down. I can run some great long trains at speed and really enjoy the sounds that we pay for in our engines.
My layout is 1x3" frames with 1/2" Homosote on top-nothing else plus cheap indoor/outdoor carpet under the track. Small nails in to the Homo. hold track in place. It is reasonably quiet with old Lionel steam engines. Underneath is open because of my Standard gauge on the floor and the dog likes to lay there. I use new tubular track with as many 40" straights that I ca. Some of my joints(track) are noisey so I should go back and smooth them out. If I am running a smooth engine like my 681 or a 2065 the engine noise isn't bad.
My LHS has a large display O gauge layout and a smaller "classic" 50's 0ne. Under the Fastrack on the big layout they installed indoor/outdoor green carpet. It is very quiet. I have followed suit. The classic layout uses traditional 3 rail.
I'm trying to quiet my fastrack, I found that when I had some kato trackage, I put some tub and tile caulking immediately underneath the track and it made a big difference in track noise. But with the Lionel fastrack its quite a bit larger than n scale, I'm hoping that the same tactic will work for fastrack. I know it will be expensive.
I was in a Lowe's today and saw a box of light tan material in rolls for sale. turns out it is a very soft plastic material to put in the bottom of the silver ware drawers in your kitchen. Sort of a waffle pattern. They were 12' wide but not sure of the length and price. Struck me as an excellent sound deadener for under track.
jim pastorius posted:I was in a Lowe's today and saw a box of light tan material in rolls for sale. turns out it is a very soft plastic material to put in the bottom of the silver ware drawers in your kitchen. Sort of a waffle pattern. They were 12' wide...
Non skid drawer liner.
I tested 5 PCs of 10" fastrack with the tub & tile caulk spread underneath, WOW, WHAT A DIFFERENCE!!.
Hey David S., can you post a pic or 2 of what your FT underside looks like? Did you just put a 'coating' of caulk or did you fill the whole cavity?
I filled the whole cavity with the caulk. But please let the caulk fully dry before applying electricity to track, otherwise the track will act like a short I found out.
Wouldn't that take a lot of caulk and be expensive ??
For what it's worth... Last year I filled a couple 30" pieces with Quickcrete crack sealer. Made a big difference. In person, the difference seemed more dramatic than it sounds in the video. But, the video will give you an idea.
I think I also might have sealed the holes for the power drop connectors with some calk beforehand. But I'm not 100% positive. I remember the sealant was pretty thick. I also tried to keep it away from the connects at the ends - so it wouldn't interfere with snapping them together.
It is heavy.
In the video, track is on porcelain tile. Left side track is filled. Right side is hollow.
YouTube Fastrack sound comparison
Attachments
Other folks have commented that filling each piece helps a lot, of course it's also a lot of work! BTW, I can tell the difference on the video. I think Lee Willis a few years ago filled a bunch of them with spray foam and that worked well too.
audi posted:I silenced my fastrak by selling it and buying Atlas.
fred
And I by selling the FasTrack and buying GarGraves/Ross.
My next layout is going to have a carpet foam underlay on it where the track roadbed will run.
I believe he has a foam base under the carpet foam also(pink stuff).
Now that would make it as quiet as a church moose.