Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm using old-style conventional 3-rail track and I'm happy with it because:

 

1) It's strong and reliable

2) It's relatively cheap

3) Many different curve radii for track planning variety

4) It doesn't have the noise issues of plastic roadbeds

5) Excellent electrical conductivity

6) It's somewhat flexible, easier to make final connections than with rigid sections

7) It's still pretty easy to acquire

8) Works with Magne-Traction

9) The old non-derailing switches are reliable, durable, convenient for operation

 

2012-2054-floor-layout

IMG_3407x

 The only down side is appearance, but even that qualifies as "traditional" and it looks right with my mostly Postwar trains.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 2012-2054-floor-layout
  • IMG_3407x
Last edited by Ace

I've been very happy with my Atlas"O" track system operation. My turnouts have been reliable ( power-feed jumper all three rails on each "stub").

My biggest issue has been "clearance" issues with various manufacturers wheel-sets as they all seem to change flange-depth dimensions "at-will" with Big L being one of the worst offenders. Never had any issue with Atlas "O" rolling stock on Atlas"O" track.

Another issue has been wheel-gauge variances among importers rolling stock. This has led to some judicious grinding around the turnout frog areas of some turnouts, but that is not the fault of the track.

The quietness of the Atlas"O" track is the big seller for me along with visual aesthetics.

I'm extremely happy ...after 11.5 years of trouble free service I have virtually no complaints !

P1130832

 

P1130862

Some premier MTH 2/3 rail locos hiccup slightly here where the switches go back to back to back ....other than that 90% of my motive power will crawl through here at 3 SMPH.

P1130844

 I have ran 18 inch passenger cars through this interchange from the secondary to the main line at 90 smph with no accidents.

P1130877

 

 This is something that will have to be addressed in the future...wheel flanges are cutting into the base of the switch....I started noticing these cuts about 5 years ago but so far nothing derails when pushing or pulling through them.

P1130866

 

The table is small so there isn't much to go wrong.

 

DCS shows 10s throughout the whole table and recently added TMCC works great also.

 

I know this track gets a bad rap but I have had no troubles,after some of the stories I read here I can see why people don't like it...as far as a Christmas tree track or a carpet central track it truly is a abysmal failure...I bought it all new and set it up once and screwed it down.

Attachments

Images (5)
  • P1130832
  • P1130862
  • P1130844
  • P1130877
  • P1130866

Not sure. Built my first lay out since I was a kid 2 years ago. I had lot's of good condition 0-27 from the 70's. When I was a kid I just bought more of what I already had. I was 9 and I remember seeing O track with black ties and the hobby shop telling me it wouldn't work with what I had so I just stuck with what i had. Now I have all 0-27, it works really well for me so I gues I'm happy.

 

Although I never see anyone using 0-27 so I think maybe I'm missing out on something.

  

DSC01783

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSC01783
Last edited by MPCSteve

Absolutely I use Atlas Sectional Track and Midwest Cork Road bed and I use Stainless  Steel screws to put it down on the table and it is quiet as all get out and i have not

had any problems on any of the Christmas layouts I have done.  I am in the process of doing another Christmas layout for our local Library for their Christmas Party and I intend on using all Atlas Sectional Track.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×