Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I don't know that they were intentionally designed that way.  When they were designed, there were no collision standards, there was no nose-in-everything FRA, no DOT test track, etc.  The carbody was a truss with side panels merely bolted onto it, from the cab door toward the rear.  The cab had the relay cabinet at its rear wall, which added some strength, as well as welded steel sides and castings for the windshield at its front.  Thus, the cab was stronger than the carbody to its rear.  Also, the cab was astride the No. 1 truck and castings were welded into the frame there.  The frame between the rear of the cab and the No.2 truck was not as heavily constructed as on a geep, because of the truss, which was not present on a hood unit.  Thus, when catastrophic buff force was applied to a cab unit, it naturally caused the truss to fail at the first point without extra strength, and that happened to be to the rear of the relay cabinet.

There was a head-on on the Wabash at Griggsville, IL. between a westbound Geep and local freight and an eastbound F7 standing on the main line with its train.  They were holding the main line for a meet with the local, and left the switch lined for the main with their headlight off;  in other words, they inadvertantly set a trap for the other train. 

 

Exactly the same thing happened.  The cab end of the F broke off and was only connected to the rest of the unit by a small pipe.

 

Injuries to the crew?  None.  They were in the restaurant across the way.  The engineer on the Geep was killed.

 

EdKing

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×