Skip to main content

 
 
 

BNSF to test liquefied natural gas in road locomotives

2013-03-06

BNSF will begin testing a small number of locomotives using liquefied natural gas (LNG) as an alternative fuel later this year, as will be announced by Matthew K. Rose, BNSF chairman and CEO at the CERAWeek conference on March 6.

"The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel is a potential transformational change for our railroad and for our industry," said Rose. "While there are daunting technical and regulatory challenges still to be faced, this pilot project is an important first step that will allow BNSF to evaluate the technical and economic viability of the use of liquefied natural gas in through-freight service, potentially reducing fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions, thereby providing environmental and energy security benefits to our nation."

BNSF has been working with the two principal locomotive manufacturers, GE and EMD, a unit of Caterpillar, to develop the natural gas engine technology that will be used in the pilot.

The use of natural gas as a transportation fuel results in the emission of fewer greenhouse gases and particulates than diesel fuel.

The idea of using natural gas as fuel in locomotives is not new. The former Burlington Northern used natural gas locomotives in the 1980s and 1990s. BNSF also tested LNG switch locomotives in Los Angeles until they reached the end of their useful life a few years ago.

Improved economics and technology make the use of natural gas in long-haul service more operationally feasible today. The BNSF pilot will be a first step to consider how the technology could be implemented. However, even though natural gas in long-haul service has enormous potential, several significant regulatory challenges need to be addressed.

"The changed market for natural gas in the United States is a critical part of our decision to explore it as a locomotive fuel and in this pilot we will test natural gas engine technology in railroad service," Rose added. "We will be working with the equipment manufacturers, the various regulatory agencies and government officials to address the necessary actions to accomplish this."

About the photo: The former Burlington Northern used natural gas locomotives in the 1980s and 1990s

 

 

 

 

 

BNSF Testing Switch to Natural Gas

March 12, 2013

Brooke Self

BNSF locomotive in California's Mojave Desert. [Ron Rering, Creative Commons)
BNSF locomotive in California's Mojave Desert. (Ron Rering, Creative Commons)
 
 

BNSF Railway Co. will test liquefied natural gas in a small number of its locomotives later this year.

"The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel is a potential transformational change for our railroad and for our industry," BNSF chairman and CEO Matthew Rose stated in a news release announcing the tests.

The company is working with a unit of Caterpillar and General Electric to manufacture locomotives that run on both diesel and natural gas, according to the release. The pilot project will allow BNSF to evaluate the technical and economic viability of the use of LNG in its freight service.

The move could also reduce fuel costs and greenhouse emissions. The retail price of a gallon of diesel fuel costs $3.91, while an equivalent amount of energy in natural gas cost 48 cents, according to a recent report by the Wall Street Journal.

However, fuel savings don't reflect the additional costs the company will need to pay to cool the natural gas into a dense liquid, or the investment costs to retrofit even a small number of the company's 6,900 locomotives.

David Rosse, a retired BNSF locomotive fireman and engineer of 44 years from Barstow, said he believes the test locomotives will probably run through Barstow. He thinks the switch to liquefied natural gas would be inefficient based on observations he has made of LNG-fueled buses.

However, he said he doesn't know the exact details of the company's plans.

"With LNG you lose power and mileage," he said. "That's just the way it burns."

Rosse said LNG is also "very flammable." He said he thinks a switch to waste vegetable oil -- used by the Grand Canyon Railway Company -- would be smarter.

"Vegetable oil burns clean; and the firebox and fuels are all clean. You won't get soot and stuff in the engine," he said.

According to Rosse, the BNSF's new plans make sense given the Environmental Protection Agency's recent tightening of air pollution and emissions regulations.

The BNSF railway network is one of the leading freight carriers in the country, spanning 32,500 miles in 28 states and two Canadian provinces, according to the company's website.

Lena Kent, a BNSF spokeswoman, said testing locations have not been determined and the company is still working through technical and regulatory issues.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

BNSF to test LNG as fuel in freight locomotives

8 March 2013

 

 

US-based rail operator BNSF Railway will start testing liquefied natural gas (LNG) as an alternative fuel in its freight locomotives later in 2013.

BNSF Railway has been working with locomotive manufacturers GE Transportation and EMD, a unit of Caterpillar, to develop the LNG engine technology that will be used in the pilot project.

The use of LNG as transportation fuel is being explored as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and particulates when compared to diesel.

BNSF chairman and CEO Matthew Rose said that the use of LNG as an alternative fuel is a potential transformational change for the company.

"While there are daunting technical and regulatory challenges still to be faced, this pilot project is an important first step that will allow BNSF to evaluate the technical and economic viability of the use of liquefied natural gas in through-freight service, potentially reducing fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions, thereby providing environmental and energy security benefits to our nation," Rose said.

"BNSF Railway has been working with locomotive manufacturers GE Transportation and EMD, a unit of Caterpillar, to develop the LNG engine technology that will be used in the pilot project."

The pilot will see BNSF test six modified locomotives, three each from Caterpillar and GE.

BNSF said if the pilot project is successful, it would offer huge saving in terms of fuel as its locomotives consume around 4.9 billion litres of diesel per year.

BNSF's predecessor Burlington Northern used LNG as a fuel for locomotives on a small stretch of contained track in the 1980s and 1990s.

"The changed market for natural gas in the United States is a critical part of our decision to explore it as a locomotive fuel and in this pilot we will test natural gas engine technology in railroad service," Rose said.

"We will be working with the equipment manufacturers, the various regulatory agencies and government officials to address the necessary actions to accomplish this."

BNSF plans to make a decision in 2014 on whether it will start to switch its fleet of over 6,900 locomotives to LNG.

In January 2013, the company unveiled plans to invest $4.1bn on capital expenditures (CAPEX) in 2013, an increase of $450m (11%) compared to the 2012 capital spending budget of $3.6bn.


If BNSF and other railroads are truly serious about the use of LNG, then they should send some expertise over to Russia to learn a few things. The Russians have been investigating the use of LNG for railways for several years now and are very likely to be in a position to teach BNSF a thing or two about the use of LNG for railroads.

 

I would chalk this up to a publicity stunt if it were not for BNSF being completely owned and operated by Berkshire Hathaway. Berkshire Hathaway owns many natural gas holdings including MidAmerican Energy Company and Northern Natural Gas.

The "problem" is NOT getting the prime mover diesel engines in todays current EMD and GE locomotives. In fact, EMD 567 engines were modified to burn natural gas back in the 1950s (all that was done was to add a gas valve port in each cylinder head).

 

The real "issue" in using LNG is multifold:

 

1) It is fairly expensive and the process is fairly elaborate to compress/liquify the natural gas. The process also used a fair bit of energy too.

 

2) The transfer of the LNG into the "LNG Tender", i.e. fueling the trailing LNG tank car is NOT as simple as just re-fueling the diesel locomotive's on board fuel tank.

 

3) It will be a significant expense to build and maintain strategically located liquefaction & fueling facilities.

 

One must remember that there is an expense to ALL forms of "energy". What may very well be "cheap" today, possibly due to "lack of use/demand", could turn VERY expensive once there is a VERY high demand.

 

Just a few thoughts from when the BN and the UP went through this LNG investigation and trial some 15 or more years ago.

It is a good thing that BNSF and CN and others are looking into the possibility of using LNG in some fashion. If the tech issues and other safety issues can be redolved and the dollars make sence then the roads will moce on it. I suspect that like many other moves made for progress it will take many refinments but if it is worth while ptogress will be served.

This is a dollars and cents move.  Natural gas is abundant in North America thanks to the application of fracking technology.  The price of gas has come down to the point that it is taking a share of the energy market back from coal in the manufacturing and power generation industries.  Diesel fuel is significantly more expensive than coal and this project might pencil out despite the costs that HW cited.

 

The Washington State Ferry system is also studying conversion of some boats in their EMD and GE diesel powered fleet to CNG.  The cost savings are just to big to not take a look.

From Railfan and Railroad Magazine's website:

 

"General Electric Transportation plans to move nearly a thousand jobs from its locomotive assembly plant in Erie, Penn., to its new, lower-cost plant in North Fort Worth, Texas. 950 jobs will be cut from Erie's 5500-member workforce as the company's locomotive and mining equipment sales expectations have been reduced, due in part to the increased use of natural gas by electric utilities. Railroads have put surplus locomotives into storage as coal shipments decline, and reduced coal mining activity has eaten into the market for mining equipment."


http://railfan.com/railnews/

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×