Skip to main content

Have noticed that there is a tremendous variety in the sounds of bells. This is understandable but I'm curious as to what some of the differences are on the prototypes.   With our models I remember vividly how clear and distinct the bell was on our first (Proto 1) MTH scale Hudson (1996). It clearly depicted a swinging bell with slightly uneven rings and I could visualize it rocking back and forth on the locomotive. Many of the newer ones on steamers seem to be 'rapid-fire' bells and have a much duller sound, some almost a 'clank' as opposed to a true ringing bell sound. I noticed the rapid ringing on the new MTH Daylight for example. Good overall sound however.

The dull clanks seem more to be found on diesels. 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The sound of a bell is defined by various components. First, the material of the bell. Bronze bells have a much sweeter ring to them compared to steel bells, which have more of a dull sound. The shape and size of the bell will also affect it's sound.

 

Then you have the different types of clappers. Some bells have free swinging clappers where, as the bell is swung in the yoke, the clapper will make contact with the bell. With this type of bell the crew could vary the ring cadence and loudness, a bit, by how they pulled on the bell cord. Other bells have air actuated clappers, where the bell is held stationary and an air piston pushes the clapper into the side of the bell.

Last edited by NJCJOE
Originally Posted by c.sam:

Have noticed that there is a tremendous variety in the sounds of bells. This is understandable but I'm curious as to what some of the differences are on the prototypes.   With our models I remember vividly how clear and distinct the bell was on our first (Proto 1) MTH scale Hudson (1996). It clearly depicted a swinging bell with slightly uneven rings and I could visualize it rocking back and forth on the locomotive. Many of the newer ones on steamers seem to be 'rapid-fire' bells and have a much duller sound, some almost a 'clank' as opposed to a true ringing bell sound. I noticed the rapid ringing on the new MTH Daylight for example. Good overall sound however.

The dull clanks seem more to be found on diesels. 

1) There are basically two different types of bell operations; A) a swinging bell as on earlier steam locomotives, and B) a bell with an air operated clapper mounted inside the bell. As information, the SP Daylight steam locomotive does NOT have a swinging bell, but an air operated clapper inside the bell, which tends to give a more steady, faster ringing.

 

2) Many different materials make up locomotive bells, especially diesel bell, which were changed from brass/bronze castings to steel casting, thus no longer producing that nice "ringing" sound.

Yeah, the swinging bell is essentially more "old-fashioned". The NYC Hudsons, designed

in the 20's and 30's, had swinging bells. The NYC Niagara, a child of the 40's, had a stationary, moving-clapper bell mounted down under the pilot beam. Late steam and early diesel bells were pretty much cut from the same cloth, often. There were, however, some 

early diesel switchers with swinging bells. 

Another issue that tends to get me a bit aggravated is, the manufacturers don't seem to get the correct "bell sound" with the type of bell that the model real should have. Such as the sound of a beautiful steam locomotive "swinging bell", on a model that has an air operated "diesel bell" such as the SP Daylights, and the "Big Three" UP steam locomotives, and the NKP Berkshires, none of which had "swinging bells".

I suppose bells on steam locos varied in tone and loudness just like churchbells do, and at least on very early ones by how the rope to activate them was pulled.  Were later ones controlled by a manual mechanism, too, or by a powered mechanism?

 

I would assume both horn and bell on modern (real) diesels are electronically synthesized - in which case they no doubt do have a perfectly even cadence and sound synthesized.

 

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

I suppose bells on steam locos varied in tone and loudness just like churchbells do, and at least on very early ones by how the rope to activate them was pulled.  Were later ones controlled by a manual mechanism, too, or by a powered mechanism?

 

The most common method of "powering" a swinging type bell, was to install a small air powered piston/cylinder on the side of the bell hanger & yoke. Thus, the air piston made the bell swing (look closely at the Santa Fe 3751 videos).

 

 

I would assume both horn and bell on modern (real) diesels are electronically synthesized - in which case they no doubt do have a perfectly even cadence and sound synthesized.

 

No. "synthesized" or electric/electronic bells were tried by the C&NW RR, and although they required far less maintenance, the sound wasn't very loud. All modern diesel units have REAL air horns and air powered bells. Although the bells are no longer brass, but are now steel (to prevent theft) and are plenty loud, per fRA sound level requirements. 

 

 

Where I work we operate an 1873 Mason 0-6-4T, a rebuilt 1868 Manchester 0-4-0 (now 4-4-0) and an 1897 Baldwin 4-4-0 (and occasionally a 1942 GE 45 ton diesel) and all their bells have different sounds to them.  They're all brass bells, but different shapes, sizes and probably differences in the metal all make for unique tones.  The mason has a slightly duller quieter tone to it, where as the Manchester has a louder one.

 

Mason

Manchester

Baldwin

GE

 

Don't forget that a lot of diesels are now equipped with "E-Bells".  Essentially a loud speaker playing the sound of a bell instead of an actual bell.  There are fewer moving parts to maintain that way.

 

 

Last edited by SantaFe158
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

 

I would assume both horn and bell on modern (real) diesels are electronically synthesized - in which case they no doubt do have a perfectly even cadence and sound synthesized.

 

No. "synthesized" or electric/electronic bells were tried by the C&NW RR, and although they required far less maintenance, the sound wasn't very loud. All modern diesel units have REAL air horns and air powered bells. Although the bells are no longer brass, but are now steel (to prevent theft) and are plenty loud, per fRA sound level requirements. 

 

 

 

When I was recording sounds at the GE Transportation Plant in Erie, PA, several of the locomotives had electronic bells. Either the ES44 or the AC6000, I don't remember which. I do not know if these were representative of what they delivered to  customers, or if their customers replaced the electronic bell with a real one.

 

We were amused at how "fake" the electronic bells sounded--when they stopped ringing, the sound was abruptly truncated without the naturally occurring tail!

Last edited by Railsounds
Originally Posted by Railsounds:

We were amused at how "fake" the electronic bells sounded--when they stopped ringing, the sound was abruptly truncated without the naturally occurring tail!

Exactly, plus in severely cold weather, those electronic bells never seemed to work well. nor did the sound cary very far. Of course, I'm remembering those electronic bells from the 1970s.

Originally Posted by Dennis:

I meant the horn on the diesels.  They have several pitches blowing all at once, like a chord.  How many pitches are they using on some of them now?

.....

Dennis

Ah, the horn. That is a whole different story since there are many, many, many types of diesel horns available, and it all depends on what each different railroad specifies. Plus I believe there are still two manufacturers of horns, Nathan and Leslie. Another variable would be wear & foreign material in the diaphragms of the different bells of the horn assembly.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×