Skip to main content

Another project on the bench is this poor cobbled together Hudson that a buddy of mine picked up .......this thing has been trough the ringer to say the least.....after examining the multitudes of hacking that went on before we received it, our thoughts have turned to saving this piece rather than completely stripping it for parts and calling it quits....take a look at the pics and you’ll see it’s close to the too far gone category, but we’re going to save it....plans are to create a brass hybrid using a MTH Dreyfuss chassis with Boxpok drivers and a PT tender capturing the look of the real #5445 sometime around 1945-1946......what we are starting with we believe is collection of cobbled together (poorly) Williams and Smithsonian Lionel parts. The final picture shows the Dreyfuss brass shell resting on a MTH Hudson chassis that I just happen to have lying there to see how close we’re going to be....we’re not far off at all.....I’ll update as we move forward, I wanted to share pics of just how bad a shape this thing was in before we begin....😳...........Pat2AF5CDAE-FB99-4EF8-9D0C-E15998987735324AB2F9-A0D6-482A-B9FC-F0D2F21C9CBF1993415F-6DEB-4446-8A7F-EC397D989AE2D9765864-524B-4592-8F63-B3761D1A805E58426894-53D0-4099-AAA5-1BD2A0C962CF1EC0A329-48B9-4140-AFDA-8A5E5A794FC1210FB2DE-1433-4EF6-902B-37518489E7BC8673A62E-7301-4ED8-B274-DBAACACC7930DC5F045B-461A-4DFF-95EB-3FFC74F6FFE8

Attachments

Images (9)
  • 2AF5CDAE-FB99-4EF8-9D0C-E15998987735
  • 324AB2F9-A0D6-482A-B9FC-F0D2F21C9CBF
  • 1993415F-6DEB-4446-8A7F-EC397D989AE2
  • D9765864-524B-4592-8F63-B3761D1A805E
  • 58426894-53D0-4099-AAA5-1BD2A0C962CF
  • 1EC0A329-48B9-4140-AFDA-8A5E5A794FC1
  • 210FB2DE-1433-4EF6-902B-37518489E7BC
  • 8673A62E-7301-4ED8-B274-DBAACACC7930
  • DC5F045B-461A-4DFF-95EB-3FFC74F6FFE8
Last edited by harmonyards
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

rockstars1989 posted:

Wow you must be good at your trade! My chances would be zero to none ha. Nick

What you do with wood Nick, I can do with this Hudson......anything wooden is my nemesis.....I can only dream of designing and executing a project like you’re doing.......and you probably figured it all out in your head..........me......I’d fail at the materials list......😉.......Pat

There has been a lot of discussion of the color of Hudson models on the Forum. I have seen factual information about prototypical Hudson paint distributed over a number of different threads. It would be great to have guidelines collected in one place for those who wish to paint their Hudson the correct color.

Pat, could you lay out for us the details of how you would select and purchase the correct color of paint and paint chemistry for painting a NYC 1938 Hudson, and how you would evaluate if the sprayed color out of the bottle is correct.  If there is a compact summary you feel fits the bill that already exists, please provide the link. Thanks.

@Norman R posted:

There has been a lot of discussion of the color of Hudson models on the Forum. I have seen factual information about prototypical Hudson paint distributed over a number of different threads. It would be great to have guidelines collected in one place for those who wish to paint their Hudson the correct color.

Pat, could you lay out for us the details of how you would select and purchase the correct color of paint and paint chemistry for painting a NYC 1938 Hudson, and how you would evaluate if the sprayed color out of the bottle is correct.  If there is a compact summary you feel fits the bill that already exists, please provide the link. Thanks.

The only way we could do this, is if the thread remains on target about facts on the actual colors, the process I used, and historical context. The problem on this forum is it becomes washed out with what model mfr.’s that did it right, did it wrong, this company got it right, this company got it wrong, and the whole song and dance starts over again, and then the thread gets deleted, and people get booted….I’d love to do a thread based on the historical context, and if everyone can keep on that track, then we can do it,….There’s a lot of R&D that went into my work, and ALOT of people contributed with historical knowledge & information,……but if we can’t keep it on track, then it’s a dead issue …

Pat

@harmonyards posted:

That project became a donor for Chris’s other Smithsonian Dreyfuss that needed  parts,…We did TMCC in his other Dreyfuss, fixed some boo-boos, replaced some missing parts, and saved the locomotive in this thread for a parts donor …..

Pat

One more touch on this subject then I'll move on.

I have 2 of the Williams "Masterpiece" Century/Dreyfuss Hudsons - one is a shelf queen (so far....) I bought used. Later I spotted one in bad shape and was so cheap I couldn't resist it; have not done anything with it. Or the "good" used one.

To my knowledge, these Williams locos are a version of the Smithsonian loco and have less elaborate detailing and a cheaper motor. I've never handled a S'sonian version, but when I see photos they look like they have the Williams fingerprints. I have assumed that the Wms version and the Smithsonian version made the project make financial sense.

Anyway - is that anything like true?

@D500 posted:

One more touch on this subject then I'll move on.

I have 2 of the Williams "Masterpiece" Century/Dreyfuss Hudsons - one is a shelf queen (so far....) I bought used. Later I spotted one in bad shape and was so cheap I couldn't resist it; have not done anything with it. Or the "good" used one.

To my knowledge, these Williams locos are a version of the Smithsonian loco and have less elaborate detailing and a cheaper motor. I've never handled a S'sonian version, but when I see photos they look like they have the Williams fingerprints. I have assumed that the Wms version and the Smithsonian version made the project make financial sense.

Anyway - is that anything like true?

Indeed, ….the Williams Masterpiece is the same engine as the Smithsonian, built in the same plant, with the same parts, except the motor & gearbox,……otherwise, the parts are interchangeable.

Pat

@harmonyards posted:

The only way we could do this, is if the thread remains on target about facts on the actual colors, the process I used, and historical context. The problem on this forum is it becomes washed out with what model mfr.’s that did it right, did it wrong, this company got it right, this company got it wrong, and the whole song and dance starts over again, and then the thread gets deleted, and people get booted….I’d love to do a thread based on the historical context, and if everyone can keep on that track, then we can do it,….There’s a lot of R&D that went into my work, and ALOT of people contributed with historical knowledge & information,……but if we can’t keep it on track, then it’s a dead issue …

Pat

Pat, can we give it a shot?  I'm not re-painting any Dreyfus Hudsons but am very interested in what goes into one of your model  builds.  That's why I always love an episode of Tales From Harmon Yards.  If the rest of us can't keep it factual and on point then you can shut it down.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×