Originally Posted by rrman:
What's "magical" about 1:43 scale, but not 1:48? Is there some collectors group that has 1:43 standard, much like NMRA has DCC and other standards that manufacturers tend to adhere to for compatibility and interoperability?
Nothing magical. I know it's hard to comprehend, but there ARE other hobbies/hobbyists out there besides model railroading and its own idiosynchrosies.
Diecast anything promotes a wide range of collectors/hobbyists. Autos, trucks, farm equipment, military this-and-that, commercial planes, emergency vehicles, etc.,etc.,etc.. They have their groups, clubs, societies, meets, markets, forums, etc..
That said, 1:43 as Lee and others have mentioned above, was long ago established by forces beyond our 1:48 group-think. 1:50 is actually closer. Either of those can be accommodated with a bit of 'forced perspective' tolerance; Biggers to the front, smallers to the rear. Heck, there's been articles abounding in model railroad publications that promote the use of 1:87 (HO) and 1:160 (N) products...buildings, autos, even static trains-on-a-siding-way-yonder...in a forced perspective arrangement that fool the eye just fine, thank you.
The folks that have the better shake of things, re this topic, may be the S (1:64) scalers. The Hot Wheels products...collectible in their own realm...are usually spot-on for S scale.
A '54 Chevy??? Good grief, Charlie Brown, the most memorable thing about that year/model was that my piano teacher, Ms. Pratt, would pick me up from grade school once a week in her '54 Chevy to drive me home for my piano lesson. whoopee. Until you mentioned this item, it had been as memorable as the book of Czerny fingering exercises that she foisted upon me.....
Meanwhile, back at the ranch...
KD