So just to clarify what my original intention was of this post. It was not to bash either side. I was truly asking for the opinion if the 3 rail stuff hurt the 2 rail market or helped it. To explain, the way i see it in the 80s and i'd say early-mid 90s the market was always adding new 2 rail, overland, precision, westside, sunset, etc... Were making super nice models, then it started to slow, i wondered if it was because of the 3 rail stuff, if simply they figured they couldnt compete with the price or if people started switching over. Or what? To make it clear i do the hobby for my own pleasure. I truly dont care what scale or amount of rails anyone runs. I dont care if you buy a $75 loco or $7500 loco. But what gets me is always about how expensive 2 rail is or that you need a 100x100 building to run a switcher, and bla bla bla, you know the rest. So really getting back to the question, do you think i'm right or wrong about my observation of the 3 rail. I mean obviously people still buy 2 rail as rheil pointed out.
Originally Posted by dkdkrd:
I dunno....I tend to have a more positive attitude about these matters. IMHO, I find inspiration and encouragement from ALL of the scales of this great hobby. There's something in the modeling in every scale...Z to 15" gauge...that can be of value to whatever scale I've (currently) settled on.
And the underlined is really important to this discussion...because the scale I started in 65 years ago, or the scale I'm currently in, and all of those in between, is not necessarily the scale I will end up spending time, skill, and $$$. But I want them ALL to grow and be successful....because that's how the hobby of Model Railroading...toy, hi-rail, or scale...will endure.
So, the O2R vs. O3R question re positive or negative toward each other?......
Let's be positive. This hobby is stronger for ALL of its parts/scales.
Again......just MHO.
KD