Skip to main content

It has been a while since I have posted about our progress on the Munoz Lines. Much has been done in the last two weeks and it is the first opportunity I have had to work on the railroad since last May. So much has happened and Ginny and I are so fortunate to have survived the storm with no major damage. Our hearts go out to all of those who are still struggling.

 

From time to time, as I work on the layout, I come back to focusing on individual scenes and how much I enjoy the locomotives working their way through those scenes with their respective trains. I think back to my boyhood and how much I enjoyed putting my head close to the track to enjoy the locomotives and cars blasting through. Now that I am building a railroad that is so much bigger and intricately detailed, I find myself running huge trains and watching from a distance as if I was up on some hillside enjoying the entire panorama. It has been only recently that I have thought about running much smaller locomotives and what the layout would look like if it was not designed with curves large enough for Big Boys and such.

 

I have been working on a scene with a newly scratchbashed engine house from David Duhamel of Crescent Locomotive Works. David builds the most amazingly beautiful structures out of laser cut wood and provides wonderful interior detail, builds a fully lit structure (my two stall engine house is 36" long and has about 24 lamps with LED's), and it arrived at my house already built for a price under $200. Why folks are not beating down his door is the mystery of the day. In any case, the scene includes a 24" scratchbuilt wooden trestle that locos have to traverse before they arrive at the engine house and some rockwork on a hillside that has come out very well. As a matter of fact, I plan to ask the Forum to let me know if I have graduated from "rock school." That is another story.   Sigh  .  .  .

 

Over the past week or so, I have so enjoyed watching my little Atlas 0-6-0 go back and forth over that trestle and towards the engine house. I am beginning to think "Small" thoughts like how much more scenery my layout would allow me to have if I ran smaller locos. It seems to me the layout would be even more realistic because the largest locos still look pretty cramped even on the larger curves. I really am enjoying the small trains, too. There is something very appealing about a small loco with three or four cars simply puffing along like the little engine that could.

 

My small thoughts even have me thinking of the next layout before this one is built. I became enamored with the steam giants and, of course, I still love them. I think, perhaps, it is time to get smaller. And I'm not talking about Dunkin Donuts which I should certainly avoid more. I think the next layout will likely be smaller and feature smaller locos and trains and a lot more scenery.

 

I have not done anything work on the engine house other than to prepare the tracks, wire them up and wire up the house. Please excuse the shaky video. I was trying to place the video camera at an angle where you could view the truss detail. You'll see out of focus work ladders and lights that are askew. All of that will be repaired. There are no added details yet in the house, all of that is to come. The entire scene will be one of my favorites when it is completed.

 

 

 

 

Scrappy

Last edited by Scrapiron Scher
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I find that smaller locos look best on all but the largest of layouts. I wonder how far (or close) Eliot is from switching at least some of his motive power and rolling stock to On3. It's quite an appealing scale. I've thought more than a few times about modeling a New England narrow gauge railroad. The scenic possibilities and small trains would be an unbeatable combination, not to mention the prototypical 2 rail track.

 

 

I like smaller locomotives the best, in part because I don't have the space or curves to handle larger ones, and in part simply because I like smaller motive power.  I can't exactly say why...it's just a personal preference.  Among my special favorites are 0-4-0s, 0-6-0s, and 0-8-0s, along wirh small diesel power and critters.

 

I hope Eliot will keep the magazine in mind for several how-to articles and features documenting his work.  They are always welcome.

Eliot....very nice video!  I like the others have stated above am looking forward to seeing some updates.  AND...I agree with your assessment of David's work.  Beautiful craftsmanship at a price that is affordable.  I have a couple of his structures and soon will be contacting him about his new roundhouse..

 

Thanks!

Alan

Hey, Eliot!

 

That is a great looking engine house, and your video makes it look that much better too.

 

I often wondered whether detailing the inside of a shed or such structure would be worth it since they really are not that visible. But after looking at your video, I believe I will be adding details to mine!

 

Thank you for sharing!

 

Alex

Hey Lionel Bill,

Ginny and I hope to see you and your wife December 15 at the Fourth Annual Munoz Lines extravaganza !! 

 

Alex,

I recommend detailing the interior of your strucures IF you can get a camera inside. I will try to super detail the engine house. This video was a sorry one.

 

Don . . .  When are you coming over to help me shoot a proper video? If we put you up for a long time, can we come to Maui????

 

Lol

 

Eliot

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×