Skip to main content

Not sure if anyone can answer, but just wondering how much of  backup is this move causing? I have heard the moves top speed is limited to 40 MPH but am pretty sure the UP's trains across the desert run faster than that. Also when they head North out of Vegas tomorrow there is a lot of single track all the way to SLC. How is the UP dealing with the bottle neck?

Last edited by cbojanower
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Probably with a lot of siding time for the 4014.  UP has no compunction about sending a 40 mph train ahead of a 50 mph train.  If the 40 mph train is moving at or close to 40 then a half hour head start will keep them out there for many miles.  UP measures velocity and the system is currently at 19.5 mph so if everyone is moving........

Having said that, there are a few hot Z trains and everything will get stuck in the hole for them but other wise you have 12 hrs to work and UP see's to it that you do. 

 

Greg

Last edited by Greg Elems

The one point that nobody has mentioned so far is, the money that UP is spending on operating crews alone for this move, considering that BOTH of the diesel units each have an Engineer, since they could not MU them together, and they are NOT using DPU capability, if the units are even equipped with DPU. Now compound that with the foreshortened crew runs between "stop overs", and the cost of dead-heading crews, by way of crew vans, will wind up being a huge expense.

Originally Posted by J Daddy:

lets just hope it does not seize up a bearing... she might be in the siding a little longer that the UP planned...

I seriously doubt anything like that would happen, especially with all the running gear preparation that went into the locomotive, prior to this move. Besides, all the rods (rotating motion) are NOT under power/thrust, they are only simply rotating, at a VERY reduced RPM at that.

The day it left West Colton, it never exceeded 20mph. At least that first day, there was no issues with the 4014 at all, all the way to Yermo. There was significant back up on the BNSF Cajon Sub as anytime the engine stopped for inspection/display, they would not run trains by on parallel tracks. BNSF had several relief crews running around for those trains running out of time, but these days, that's pretty normal. There was a BNSF employee on the 4014 for the entire trip from Colton to Yermo, to "coordinate moves while on BNSF tracks".... of course he is a high up official and a railfan as well.  

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:

lets just hope it does not seize up a bearing... she might be in the siding a little longer that the UP planned...

I seriously doubt anything like that would happen, especially with all the running gear preparation that went into the locomotive, prior to this move. Besides, all the rods (rotating motion) are NOT under power/thrust, they are only simply rotating, at a VERY reduced RPM at that.

Wow, do I see a glimmer of optimism in you?

 

What is interesting is the timing of the project. 5 years? Why so long?

I Did not think the 4014 needed that much reconstruction.

 

Originally Posted by J Daddy:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:

lets just hope it does not seize up a bearing... she might be in the siding a little longer that the UP planned...

I seriously doubt anything like that would happen, especially with all the running gear preparation that went into the locomotive, prior to this move. Besides, all the rods (rotating motion) are NOT under power/thrust, they are only simply rotating, at a VERY reduced RPM at that.

Wow, do I see a glimmer of optimism in you?

 

What is interesting is the timing of the project. 5 years? Why so long?

I Did not think the 4014 needed that much reconstruction.

 

Let's see now, the 4014's been out of service for 45-50 or so years now...

 

I'm pretty sure Hot Water could give you all the gory details, but in a nutshell, the 4014 is going to have to be brought up to current FRA requirements and I'm pretty sure that includes pulling all the flues and ultrasounding the entire boiler and firebox, along with all the required mechanical work along with any surprises (there will be some) along the way.

 

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
 

 

What is interesting is the timing of the project. 5 years? Why so long?

I Did not think the 4014 needed that much reconstruction.

 

Let's see now, the 2014's been out of service for 45-50 or so years now...

 

I'm pretty sure Hot Water could give you all the gory details, but in a nutshell, the 2014 is going to have to be brought up to current FRA requirements and I'm pretty sure that includes pulling all the flues and ultrasounding the entire boiler and firebox, along with all the required mechanial work.

 

Rusty

 

OK, here are some possibilities:

 

1) All the superheater units will have to be removed and completely replaced.

 

2) All the flues/tubes will have to be completely removed and replaced.

 

3) the boiler will have to be completely inspected and ultrasound tested with the sheet thicknesses recorded. Same for the firebox.

 

4) Untold number of staybolt caps & sleeves will have to be replaced, with possible renewal of untold number of satybolts.

 

5) The American Multiple Valve front end throttle will have to be completely disassembled and valves, seats, camshaft, and lifting fingers rebuilt or replaced.

 

6) The cab will most likely be removed, in order to remove and repair or replace virtually every component on the boiler back head.

 

7) All appliances removed and rebuilt, including air pumps, Elesco exhaust steam injector, Nathan 4000S injector, dynamotor, power reverse assembly, whistle, bell, cold water turbine pump, and cylinder cocks. Just to name a few.

 

8) Entire electrical system completely renewed/rewired.

 

9) Removal of coal ash pans, ash hopper, stoker system, and firebox grates & grate shakers & supports.

 

10) Removal of Engine truck and Trailing truck assemblies for complete rebuilding.

 

11) Removal of all drive wheel sets in order to be sent out for new tires and crankpins. This process may take two years alone, since all the wheel sets can NOT be removed all at the same time. There has be SOMETHING supporting the locomotive! 

 

12) Complete spring rigging and springs need to be rebuilt/replaced as required (probably all NEW springs), which also includes all new pins & bushings in everything that moves, including brake rigging and brake cylinder assemblies.

 

13) Firebox converted to oil burning.

 

14) Tender completely rebuilt including removal of stoker engine and auger equipment, rebuild or replacement of springs, spring rigging, brake rigging, brake cylinders, and renewal of all pis & bushings. Tender must also be converted to fire hose filling from ground level on either side.

 

15) Complete renewal of the cab signal equipment to the latest solid state design combined UP/CNW cab signal & ATC system.

 

These are all the "Big Ticket" items that I can think of at the moment.

I have a question:

 

Most comments about "where will the Big Boy operate" are meet with an answer of something like, "well, it depends. If there is a wye or something".

 

Maybe a better way to ask this is "under the current UP system/track map, where will the Big Boy most likely NOT be found?" Meaning, without changing any of the current infrastructures, are there any "popular" areas/cities on the UP system that will not see the engine?

 

Could the engine make it from Chicago in the east to LA, SF, and Seattle in the west?

 

If Cris Christy makes it all the way to the oval office and he requests’ the Big Boy to attend the presidential inauguration, will/could you get the engine to Washington?

 

This last comment is totally hypothetical and just for discussion.

 

Charlie 

Originally Posted by Charlie:

I have a question:

 

Most comments about "where will the Big Boy operate" are meet with an answer of something like, "well, it depends. If there is a wye or something".

 

Maybe a better way to ask this is "under the current UP system/track map, where will the Big Boy most likely NOT be found?" Meaning, without changing any of the current infrastructures, are there any "popular" areas/cities on the UP system that will not see the engine?

 

The biggest factor in 4014 potentially "visiting" anyplace on the UP system, would of course depend on whether it, and its train, had to be turned at THAT particular town. But, if 4014, and her consist, were simply stopping enroute, then there would only be the issue of a suitable track to display the consist for some days. That has become a problem with 844, and previously 3985, as most towns/cities no longer had depots with a "house track" or suitable siding to "park & display on".

 

Could the engine make it from Chicago in the east to LA, SF, and Seattle in the west?

 

Conceivably, yes although UP doesn't actually go into Seattle, THAT is BNSF. Probably wouldn't fit into San Francisco, due to the Caltrans commuter operation, however, Oakland would be doable, I believe. 

 

If Cris Christy makes it all the way to the oval office and he requests’ the Big Boy to attend the presidential inauguration, will/could you get the engine to Washington?

 

No! I can NOT see UP EVER allowing ANY of their OPERATING steam locomotives to go "off line", especially what happened when the Challenger went down to the Clinchfield RR for the 50th anniversary of their famous "Santa Claus Special Train". Besides, none of the UP steam locomotives will fit into the Washington D.C. area, due to clearances and that ever present overhead electric wire!

 

This last comment is totally hypothetical and just for discussion.

 

Actually NOT, Charlie. The UP wanted to take 3985 "over to New York City" on a barge in order to be present at a big political convention event, quite some years ago. Clearer heads eventually prevailed, after it was "discovered" that 1) she simply wouldn't fit anyplace in the eastern states, and 2) how heavy she was, especial fired up (which was their "plan").

 

Charlie 

 

Re the 4014 operating in the eastern part of the USA, it was often observed that western steam locomotives were about a foot taller and wider then eastern locomotives. Why? The eastern railroads were  built earlier, in tighter quarters. Only the Erie had generous clearances, as it was originally built to 6 foot gauge. The Erie was used frequently to ship big western locomotives from the eastern builders.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CWEX:

Well the first "excursion" is supposed to be for the Railgiants group right?

You mean the "first excursion" out of the LA area, right?  I'll bet the "first excursion", which may come right after the first break-in run, would be over Sherman Hill.

Yes I did...L.A. 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
 

 

What is interesting is the timing of the project. 5 years? Why so long?

I Did not think the 4014 needed that much reconstruction.

 

Let's see now, the 2014's been out of service for 45-50 or so years now...

 

I'm pretty sure Hot Water could give you all the gory details, but in a nutshell, the 2014 is going to have to be brought up to current FRA requirements and I'm pretty sure that includes pulling all the flues and ultrasounding the entire boiler and firebox, along with all the required mechanial work.

 

Rusty

 

OK, here are some possibilities:

 

1) All the superheater units will have to be removed and completely replaced.

 

2) All the flues/tubes will have to be completely removed and replaced.

 

3) the boiler will have to be completely inspected and ultrasound tested with the sheet thicknesses recorded. Same for the firebox.

 

4) Untold number of staybolt caps & sleeves will have to be replaced, with possible renewal of untold number of satybolts.

 

5) The American Multiple Valve front end throttle will have to be completely disassembled and valves, seats, camshaft, and lifting fingers rebuilt or replaced.

 

6) The cab will most likely be removed, in order to remove and repair or replace virtually every component on the boiler back head.

 

7) All appliances removed and rebuilt, including air pumps, Elesco exhaust steam injector, Nathan 4000S injector, dynamotor, power reverse assembly, whistle, bell, cold water turbine pump, and cylinder cocks. Just to name a few.

 

8) Entire electrical system completely renewed/rewired.

 

9) Removal of coal ash pans, ash hopper, stoker system, and firebox grates & grate shakers & supports.

 

10) Removal of Engine truck and Trailing truck assemblies for complete rebuilding.

 

11) Removal of all drive wheel sets in order to be sent out for new tires and crankpins. This process may take two years alone, since all the wheel sets can NOT be removed all at the same time. There has be SOMETHING supporting the locomotive! 

 

12) Complete spring rigging and springs need to be rebuilt/replaced as required (probably all NEW springs), which also includes all new pins & bushings in everything that moves, including brake rigging and brake cylinder assemblies.

 

13) Firebox converted to oil burning.

 

14) Tender completely rebuilt including removal of stoker engine and auger equipment, rebuild or replacement of springs, spring rigging, brake rigging, brake cylinders, and renewal of all pis & bushings. Tender must also be converted to fire hose filling from ground level on either side.

 

15) Complete renewal of the cab signal equipment to the latest solid state design combined UP/CNW cab signal & ATC system.

 

These are all the "Big Ticket" items that I can think of at the moment.

Which is to say the throttle and reverser handles will be original.  Everything else will scratchbuilt new.

Originally Posted by rdunniii:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by J Daddy:
 

 

What is interesting is the timing of the project. 5 years? Why so long?

I Did not think the 4014 needed that much reconstruction.

 

Let's see now, the 2014's been out of service for 45-50 or so years now...

 

I'm pretty sure Hot Water could give you all the gory details, but in a nutshell, the 2014 is going to have to be brought up to current FRA requirements and I'm pretty sure that includes pulling all the flues and ultrasounding the entire boiler and firebox, along with all the required mechanial work.

 

Rusty

 

OK, here are some possibilities:

 

1) All the superheater units will have to be removed and completely replaced.

 

2) All the flues/tubes will have to be completely removed and replaced.

 

3) the boiler will have to be completely inspected and ultrasound tested with the sheet thicknesses recorded. Same for the firebox.

 

4) Untold number of staybolt caps & sleeves will have to be replaced, with possible renewal of untold number of satybolts.

 

5) The American Multiple Valve front end throttle will have to be completely disassembled and valves, seats, camshaft, and lifting fingers rebuilt or replaced.

 

6) The cab will most likely be removed, in order to remove and repair or replace virtually every component on the boiler back head.

 

7) All appliances removed and rebuilt, including air pumps, Elesco exhaust steam injector, Nathan 4000S injector, dynamotor, power reverse assembly, whistle, bell, cold water turbine pump, and cylinder cocks. Just to name a few.

 

8) Entire electrical system completely renewed/rewired.

 

9) Removal of coal ash pans, ash hopper, stoker system, and firebox grates & grate shakers & supports.

 

10) Removal of Engine truck and Trailing truck assemblies for complete rebuilding.

 

11) Removal of all drive wheel sets in order to be sent out for new tires and crankpins. This process may take two years alone, since all the wheel sets can NOT be removed all at the same time. There has be SOMETHING supporting the locomotive! 

 

12) Complete spring rigging and springs need to be rebuilt/replaced as required (probably all NEW springs), which also includes all new pins & bushings in everything that moves, including brake rigging and brake cylinder assemblies.

 

13) Firebox converted to oil burning.

 

14) Tender completely rebuilt including removal of stoker engine and auger equipment, rebuild or replacement of springs, spring rigging, brake rigging, brake cylinders, and renewal of all pis & bushings. Tender must also be converted to fire hose filling from ground level on either side.

 

15) Complete renewal of the cab signal equipment to the latest solid state design combined UP/CNW cab signal & ATC system.

 

These are all the "Big Ticket" items that I can think of at the moment.

Which is to say the throttle and reverser handles will be original.  Everything else will scratchbuilt new.

As we used to say at IRM: "Jack up whistle, replace locomotive."

Rusty

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:

those guys from train mag seem to think she will return to colton.

When and, for what? A 4000 class can't be turned there, as I think they discovered that 4014 could not SAFELY negotiate the "balloon track".

didn't they turn it west of colton? 

 

because when it left Pomona it was tender first.

 

as has been proven with this move anything is possible.

 

 

Let's go back for a moment to the report, several posts above, that the Diesels doing the pushing and pulling require two engineers, because the two Diesels, one at each end of the Big Boy "...can't be MU'd."

 

I would think that there are clever electricians on the payroll who could design and install an MU cable long enough to plug into the MU receptical on each Diesel and fasten it over the top of the tender,  and along the running board of 4014.  Surely this scheme is simple enough not to cause any problems, and has been done before in special movements of dead or disabled motive power.

 

I would imagine that even with the very best communication and coordination between seasoned engineers, an electrical solution, monitored carefully, far outweighs the vagaries of human operation.

 

[Switching flame-retardant suit from "STANDBY" to "FULL" ]

 

Last edited by Arthur P. Bloom
Originally Posted by Arthur P. Bloom:

Let's go back for a moment to the report, several posts above, that the Diesels doing the pushing and pulling require two engineers, because the two Diesels, one at each end of the Big Boy "...can't be MU'd."

 

I would think that there are clever electricians on the payroll who could design and install an MU cable long enough to plug into the MU receptical on each Diesel and fasten it over the top of the tender,  and along the running board of 4014.  Surely this scheme is simple enough not to cause any problems, and has been done before in special movements of dead or disabled motive power.

 

Well no, it isn't that simple, and has NOT been done previously for "dead or disabled motive power". Besides, there is no real need to "MU them together", when only the main brake pipe train line air hose is a requirement. The REAL issue is, because the UP Steam Manager specifically wanted THOSE TWO unit numbers, they thus don't have DPU. Had they simply selected ANY TWO units with DPU capability, then the "rear unit" (behind the tender) could/would be "linked" to the lead unit, and ONLY ONE Engineer would be controlling the diesel consist. 

 

Besides, another issue is, why the second unit in the first place? That lead 4000+HP unit is more than capably of handling that shout train, in both power and dynamic brake, even on 2.3% grades.

 

I would imagine that even with the very best communication and coordination between seasoned engineers, an electrical solution, monitored carefully, far outweighs the vagaries of human operation.

 

Exactly. However, as I just stated above, had they NOT been so concerned with having those two specific unit road numbers, the use of two DPU capable units out of the "general pool" would certainly have solved your communication concerns. That being said, I really doubt that that second unit (behind the tender) and its Engineer is really doing much anyway.

 

 

Originally Posted by Arthur P. Bloom:

It might fall under the heading of "being able to back up in a safe and expeditious way (with a clear view of the back-end) if something goes wrong" or "we need the extra braking" or some other safety-minded reason.  I can see where this is a very public-relations conscious operation, meaning, if they can afford redundancy, go for it.

Well, it appears money is no object then, otherwise DPU equipped locomotives would've been used.

 

One has to wonder, though...  At what point does money BECOME an object?

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by Arthur P. Bloom:

It might fall under the heading of "being able to back up in a safe and expeditious way (with a clear view of the back-end) if something goes wrong" or "we need the extra braking" or some other safety-minded reason.

 

Back up to were? You obviously do NOT understand railroad operating rules, which REQUIRE an person to ride the rear car in order to "protect the shove". That person riding the last car, in this specific case it's a flat car, is in constant radio contact with the lead unit Engineer.

 

  I can see where this is a very public-relations conscious operation, meaning, if they can afford redundancy, go for it.

 

And there in lies the issue! Spend the money on multiple crews, no matter what.

 

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×