Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

3 rail or 2 rail?    I had a 2 rail version.    It had flanges on all wheels, and solid side rods.    The solid side rods would not allow the wheels to adjust to curves.    It would go around 48 inch radius but would stall if running slow.     so you had to goose it up for the curves, then slow it down for the straights to keep it from being a slot car.   

I understand that the 3 rail one has blind center drivers, which means it is more like an 0-4-0 for tracking and the solid side rods will not cause an issue.    

Maybe @Bob will weigh in.  But I remember that even the 3-rail versions were considered poor runners that needed a lot of rework.  Unless you're determined to have the Pennsy Belpaire styling, I think you'll be happier with the Lionel Legacy or latest MTH Premier versions.  There was a bad batch from Lionel too, the ones that used Back-EMF for speed control.  Caveat Emptor!

Last edited by Ted S
@Ted S posted:

Maybe @Bob will weigh in.  But I remember that even the 3-rail versions were considered poor runners that needed a lot of rework.  Unless you're determined to have the Pennsy Belpaire styling, I think you'll be happier with the Lionel Legacy or latest MTH Premier versions.  There was a bad batch from Lionel too, the ones that used Back-EMF for speed control.  Caveat Emptor!

That's a shame; it's a nice looking engine...

Mark in Oregon 

I have one and love it. I took it to Hennings in Lansdale several years ago and they added the Tmcc railsounds and the original GRJ supachuffa1! 

Originally Bob Lavezzi sold me the loco at Millburn Train and Hobby several month before his departure. It was a repainted Mason locomotive. But just my luck at the Weaver models July 2015 final blowout sale I found another shell with the  correct number and was able to swap out the shells then upgrade it at Hennings.  I take it out during Christmas and run some Polar Freight with it.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×