Skip to main content

I've just seen the post about the Durango and Silverton wildfire case. I'm very surprised that such an issue should exist in this day and age. We don't really do wildfires here on the UK, the landscape and weather being what it is, but several of the Welsh narrow-gauge lines had problems in their early days with lineside fires caused by locomotives. These were typically in hay meadows and had the potential to spread to commercial conifer antations.



The Festiniog (probably the nearest analogy to the D&S in some ways) went through a process of converting to oil burning (although this was also done for economic reasons) but have now re-converted to coal burning. I'm surprised that the D&S hasn't found the need before now, to go down this route.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@smd4 posted:

Interestingly, fires caused by oil burning locomotives aren't unheard of.

And there's also a reason that screens started appearing on the exhaust stacks of non-turbocharged diesels in the late 1950's.  Prior to that time, railroads employed weed burners and got rid of line-side brush with controlled burning.  Once the railroads switched over to spraying weeds and just leaving them there, dead and dry, the occasional carbon cinder sometimes became the occasional line-side fire.

Turbocharged diesel-electric locomotives are not as prone to throwing sparks as are naturally-aspirated ones.  

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×