Skip to main content

Originally Posted by daveb:

"Had I stayed with this layout and track system, I would still be sitting here with no turnouts.  My God man, almost 2 1/2 years later and I WOULD STILL HAVE NO TURNOUTS!"

 

   The alternative is spend a couple hours learning how to build your own then be free of buying them forever. I don't think turnouts are a huge deterrent to most scale modelers, Shinohara turnouts are available as are Fast tracks jigs and materials. Give them a better selection of locos and cars and most scale modelers could figure out how to deal with the track. Scratch building a turnout might take a couple of hours while scratch building a reefer could take a month or more of hobby time plus the difficulty of finding detail parts like ladders and brake gear. That's why a good selection of RTR cars are so important to the attractiveness of S to modelers contemplating what scale to build their layout or collection in.....DaveB  

Track selection does make a difference. 

 

Personally, I have no desire to hand lay track or build turnouts.  I don't fault anyone who wants or likes to do it, but it's part of the "fun" of the hobby I'd rather do without.

 

The closest I got to hand laying track was putting in Old Pullman turnout kits (no longer available in S) where the Shinohora's wouldn't fit into my plan.  I had to do a lot of tweaking on them to get them to work reliably.  If I would have had to build my own turnouts, I would have not switched from HO to S.

 

Rusty

I'm with Rusty and use the AM track on the layout. Wide radius turns greater than 27" radius and in fact most of the layout is accomplished with flex track. The only AM sectional track used is what I have accumulated over years of shows as it doesn't turn up too often. The only difference is Rusty runs scale wheels while I use hi rail. The SHS and Lionel Fastrack are intended for hi rail as that is where the the sales volume is. Granted they needed to produce turnouts, but to expect radii greater than 27" would not be economical for any manufacturer. The real difference to me is the roadbed. Quick and easy as in SHS/Fastrack or considerable effort in ballasting as in AM. In my opinion the effort pays off in a more realistic, scale looking result. 

 

Rich

Originally Posted by falconservice:

This is just like the announcement for the New American Flyer SD40-2 and caboose, that never was produced.

 

 

Andrew

The SD40-2 wasn't given a delivery date then cancelled a month before it was to arrive.

 

And of course, there wasn't a blog back then to post it on and to keep it hanging out there as the most recent entry for two months (still is as of this posting, from Sept 12) announcing it...

 

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×