Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

That is a turnout with no gap in the frog in the diverging direction.  Union Pacific has tried some of these.  On high speed track they make less noise and take less maintenance.  They are used where the diverging route is infrequently used.  For the thru track there is no reason for a gard rail as there is no gap for the wheel to get lost in.  On the diverging route the wheel is ramped up and the wheel just bounces over the straight track.  This requires a guard rail that will keep the wheel set in line on the diverging route.

It's called a flange bearing frog.

 

I am not a mechanical engineer, but I have some reservations about whether these are as wonderful as the manufacturers would like us to believe.  I would not be surprised to learn, in a few years, that flange bearing frogs are implicated in an increase in rail failures and/or wheel failures.

 

The big selling point is frog maintenance.  Track welders are out every day building up metal on worn frogs and then grinding the welds down to the proper profile.  Every day they are somewhere on a Subdivision.

Last edited by Number 90
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×