Skip to main content

UPDATED 02/20/13

 

I've compiled a checklist to keep track of my Penn Central collection and thought I'd share it with fellow PC fans. As I collect only prototypical rolling stock and 3-rail TMCC engines, please note the following omissions from the list:

 

*Conventional locomotives

*MTH locomotives

*2-rail locomotives

*Fantasy schemes

*Traditionally detailed / Semi-scale items (Some exceptions, i.e. 18" passenger cars)

 

Other than that, the list is comprehensive. Feel free to download and edit it to your needs. I also encourage everyone to post here with any suggestions you may have, or if you see something missing. Thanks! 

Attachments

Last edited by PC9850
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

You do realize that your list does in fact contain semi-scale items (70 foot passenger cars) and fantasy rolling stock (full dome passenger car), don't you?  There might be others but I'm not a PC expert.  Like a lot of areas in this hobby, there is a choice to be made between more prototypical/less stuff available and less prototypical/more stuff available.  As long as you're having fun, that's job #1.

Originally Posted by Bob:

You do realize that your list does in fact contain semi-scale items (70 foot passenger cars) and fantasy rolling stock (full dome passenger car), don't you?  There might be others but I'm not a PC expert.  Like a lot of areas in this hobby, there is a choice to be made between more prototypical/less stuff available and less prototypical/more stuff available.  As long as you're having fun, that's job #1.

Yes, I do realize the MTH passenger cars have a few faults. However, given the extreme drought of PC passenger cars in O-gauge, I thought it would still be useful to let fans know they do exist in some form. I will be buying them. Like most MTH rolling stock, "good enough" comes to mind 

Originally Posted by Tom Densel:

Nick,

 

Thanks. This is very helpful

 

MTH also made a GP-40 in PC paint.  I don't know the model number.  Also, K-Line made a die cast gondola in PC to CR transition.  Green with PC  reporting marks but the logo is CR.  I also think they made a PC coil car, but i'm not sure.

 

Tom

I know about the GP-40, but for my purposes I couldn't include it on the list (DCS locomotives are omitted). I did not know about the K-Line cars though, thank you! I'll be looking into those.

Nick - how about that 3rd Rail FL9 you have coming? 

 

Also, while it is not scale in terms of details, the MPC era PC GP7 could be added to your list as it is at least scale proportioned. 

 

One of these days I'm probably going to convert my K-Line 21" NYC cars to PC.  We'll see what happens.

 

Yes, I've posted this on the forum in another thread, but it works here pretty well too!

 

IMGP9127_ED

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMGP9127_ED

Just a personal thing, but I only model full scale length cars.  The 18" MTH cars are not of interest to me outside of the baggage car which was typically 72' in length or in some cases 63'. 

 

Yes, I was referring to the ESE cars ........ right now I run them as part of a "City of Everywhere" at the club layout with SP Daylight, PRR and Amtrak cars in the mix as well.  Since I have more Amtrak cars coming from GGD shortly, PC would be closer to era for what I am looking to achieve, but in all seriousness, I don't have time to do many repaints these days.  Too busy doing other things.

 

Wish I had picked up a Weaver PC green B60 when I had the chance ..... oh well.

 

 

I am content with MTH's 18" cars simply because it's a miracle someone finally made PC passenger cars in O-scale at all. I also just picked up the ESE cars to go with my Lionel ESE Hudson and they're absolutely gorgeous. Definitely way too chromed out for PC in my opinion, you'd have to dull them down somehow (cover your ears K-Line fans!). Just out of curiosity, which set of ESE cars do you have? I got myself sets B and C from 1999. Sets L and M were from 2004.

 

Now as for baggage cars, I could have sworn the pure PC baggage cars MTH is making were fantasy, and that ex-PRR B60s were the main baggage cars in PC passenger trains. And speaking of which, I also didn't know Weaver made PC green ones in O-scale. I thought they only made them in different PRR schemes, and I just missed out on Eliot's great collection of them he was offering recently.

 

PC Passenger

PC passenger cars

Attachments

Images (2)
  • PC Passenger
  • PC passenger cars

I grew up next to the New York Central and saw the first months of the Penn Central. Locomotives in an uninspired basic black scheme. Passenger trains through Rochester sometimes with just a single coach and still lots of empty seats.

 

It's a bit difficult to understand nostalgia for a railroad that was as seriously dysfunctional as the Penn Central. Merged in 1968, bankrupt in 1970, became Conrail in 1976. With the advent of Amtrak in 1971, Penn Central passenger service was especially short-lived.

 

I have a few NYC boxcars in HO, but I will never aspire to have any Penn Central items. I prefer to remember the predecessor railroads. The ICC was largely at fault for the bureaucratic gridlock of regulation that led to the northeast rail crisis.  

 

PC1674F7A

Attachments

Images (1)
  • PC1674F7A

It's a bit difficult to understand nostalgia for a railroad that was as seriously dysfunctional as the Penn Central.


I forget which thread it was since it was a while ago, but there was a similar question posed and a lot of Penn Central fans came forward with their reasons. The common theme was none of us cared about the disastrous business aspect of the railroad.

 

For me, it all began with the train that got me into electric railroading. I think I was three years old, and every time we visited at my uncle's house I would go to look at the Lionel MPC Penn Central GG1 on his bookshelf. He let me hold it a few times and the sheer weight of it made a lasting impression.

 

Then there was my grandfather. He worked for the entire lineage of Pennsylvania through Conrail and Amtrak as a track man. This is where my uncle got the train bug from, and I in turn got it from him. When I really got into trains my grandfather gave me all the railroadania he had saved, and most of it was from the Penn Central. There's the picture of him next to Penn Central Alco S-2 #9850, hence my screen name.

 

So, as you see, for me it's a combination of nostalgia and familial ties to the railroad. I actually hadn't known the Penn Central was a big mess until I was old enough to comprehend business, and that was many years after the events I described above occurred.

 

IMG_0155

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_0155

I think what gets lost in the "I hate Penn Central" discussions is that the predecessor roads were not much better in nearly the decade leading to the merger.  The PRR and the NYC were in dire situations and would not have survived on their own anyway.  By the mid 60's drab paint schemes, deferred maintenance, and worn out equipment was the norm.  The third major railroad, the New Haven was in and out of bankruptcy throughout a good part of its history and never enjoyed much financial solvency in the best of times. 

 

What makes this road interesting from a modeling standpoint are the very things that brought the railroad to its final end.  Look at the variety of eclectic equipment old and some new.  Locomotives and cars that should have been put to rest years prior were still running because they had too.  There was little that didn't have a prototypical reference on this road.  The black paint scheme was certainly somber, but at that period of time noodle art was in.  Look at the CP rail branding of the time, the CN branding, the BN logo, and others.  This was a time of rebranding for the industry in general and in a large part thanks to the failure of Penn Central, we have a very healthy railroad industry today as many of the regulations that helped create the demise of the NE railroad industry were changed or done away with.

 

Granted at home, my current layout in the works is strictly 1953-1957 NY&LB.  I never grew up with these trains.  I did grow up at the end of PC and through Conrail though and have a soft spot for them.  They are the reason I could see an E8 in every day service as well as GG1s in my teens before they were retired.  That is why I still collect PC, Conrail and Amtrak equipment even though it wont' be running on my home layout. 

Originally Posted by GG1 4877:

Granted at home, my current layout in the works is strictly 1953-1957 NY&LB.  I never grew up with these trains.  I did grow up at the end of PC and through Conrail though and have a soft spot for them.  They are the reason I could see an E8 in every day service as well as GG1s in my teens before they were retired.  That is why I still collect PC, Conrail and Amtrak equipment even though it wont' be running on my home layout. 

 

The Penn Central is an important part of railroad history, it may not have been a good story for the most part, but never the less, it is an important story.

 

I was just old enough to start riding the NY & LB alone in the early 1970's, and my own memories of the PC were not that good. The NY & LB was a joint operation of the then Penn Central and Jersey Central. Unlike the jointly owned PRSL, the NY & LB did not own it's own equipment. Schedules were coordinated by the (2) operating railroads, and each railroad dished out it's own brand of service.

 

One example stands out, by the late 60's the State of NJ started to purchase 2nd hand passenger equipment for use by the PC and CNJ on the NY & LB trains. While the CNJ re-equipped all it's NY & LB trains with this "new to them" equipment, the PC only used these coaches on their rush hour NY & LB trains, they still used their ancient P-70 type coaches on the off-peak and weekend trains, and we would avoid them at all costs.

Off peak service on the NY & LB back then was a fraction what runs today as the NJT North Jersey Coast Line, so it wasn't always possible to avoid the dirty, run down PC trains.  They were dirty, and run down, but they ran, none the less.

 

Ken

Hello everyone, Due to due to health related issues I took a break from the hobby so I haven't posted here in years. 
 
Nick, Great website and layout.
 
I too enjoy collecting and operating Penn Central model trains and I remember the road very well. Great job on the PC checklist. I have a pretty decent collection of Penn Central equipment but there are several items on your list I would like to own one day.
 
I didn't know about the two MTH three bay hoppers from the 2012 catalog until I saw them on your list. They were still in stock at MTH so I had my dealer order the pair for me. I have the earlier three bay hopper w/graffiti but I'm not sure if it was available in two road numbers. 

Thanks for your assistance in increasing my Penn Central rolling stock fleet. 
 
Peter, The two color Penn Central logo was considered experimental and first applied to locomotives during the first half of 1968. Approximately 136 locomotives and a few freight cars received the red "P" with white "C" version. According to the PCHS most of the equipment was repainted with the solid white "mating worms" logo by 1971-72.
 
In October 1968 Penn Central received an order of 17 brand new EMD GP-40 locomotives factory painted with white "P" orange "C" Penn Central logos.This second two color design was also considered experimental and never repeated.
 
However, former New Haven RS-3 #5585 was painted with the white "P" orange "C" logo in April 1969 long after the experimental logo program ended. Go figure.  
 
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×