I don't have an answer regarding the continued production of realtrax, unfortunately. I hope that they do. It often gets knocked but if you put the work in to get it right, it's a nice track system and preferable to fastrack IMO.
Regarding your power source- I'd recommend a KW type transformer or one of equivalent wattage for your layout or maybe a z-1000 AT THE MINIMUM. If your running any type of loco that doesn't have DC can motors(i.e. postwar locos with AC motors), non-LED lit passenger cars, and/or Command control(18v minimum for the track)- any combination of these will quickly tax that z500. Especially if you're powering those turnouts with it! Which is why...
I highly recommend using a separate power source for your Realtrax turnouts. Whether you're running conventional or command, it's really the most optimal way for powering and operating your turnouts. Further- you can use your turnouts as lock-ons themselves-even though it's not in the MTH instructions booklet.
Below is some info that may help you with track. Basically my personal track odyssey after switching from tubular:
I do agree- fastrack is unfortunately louder. Because I still have the two realtrax switches, I have two sections of about 30 to 35 inches of Realtrax(includes the 10 inch length of the switch) on each loop. That doesn't help with the noise of the fastrack- when trains go over realtrax it's like sweet relief, then they go back to the fastrack and the noise picks up again ha. It's taken me awhile to get used to sound of fastrack, probably longer due to the aforementioned use of two types of track.
I switched from Realtrax to fastrack when I enlarged my curves.. My layout had been all realtrax with O-42 curves. I only had two o-42 Realtrax right handed switches connecting the inner and outer loops which was an issue in terms of switching between the mainline and inner loop. I wanted to switch to Gargraves, Atlas or a combo as I have a number of both their 37" wood tie, flex track straights and 37" black plastic tie straights. When it came down to it, the main reason I didn't pursue atlas, Gargraves or Ross was because I didn't want to ballast the track. My secondary reason was that I didn't want to go through the hassle of learning how to connect their turnouts.
That led me to consider if I wanted to continue using Realtrax or move to Fastrack. I had a TIU, AIU and TMCC base, but then I acquired Legacy and began running Lionel motive power almost exclusively. The reason I ultimately moved to Fastrack were curve diameters, wireless command switches and sensor track. I could do a combination of 1 o-72 and 3 o-60 with Fastrack which allowed me to keep longer straight sections on each side, MTH realtrax didn't allow for that as their o-54 apparently only requires 12 sections for a full oval(sources differ) and o-72 requires 16 sections. With fastrack, I could use o-72 and o-60. because they both require 16 sections for a circle. After further reading, I saw the o-36 half sections also required 16 sections for a circle, hence I actually made a curve combo of o-72, o-60, o-60 and half an o-36- Which allowed me to keep 100" and 25" of straight track on my sides. Now I have one end like that and a couple days ago switched my other end to the intended 0-72 and 3 o-60 sections just to give it a try. All of my rolling stock goes through the half o-36, but some- specifically Atlas 60' autoparts boxcars and 30k gallon tankers, less so for 21" Horizons- definitely didn't like that half o-36.
Anyway, keep us updated on your progress