Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

IMHO, tempered hardboard would be unsuitable because it has too much flex. Also, it would not hold screws well.

I would go with plywood.

What are the dimensions of the layout you are building?

Do you plan to frame the underside of the layout?

Is weight a consideration (does it have to be portable)?

Typically solid top train layouts require framing.

Originally Posted by C W Burfle:

IMHO, tempered hardboard would be unsuitable because it has too much flex. Also, it would not hold screws well.

I would go with plywood.

What are you are building?

Do you plan to frame the underside of the layout?

Is weight a consideration (does it have to be portable)?

Typically solid top train layouts require framing.

*The dimensions of the layout will be 42inches by 42inches I would prefer it to be portable.

Look for Baltic Birch multi layer plywood. It will be much stronger than standard plywood due to more but thinner layers in equal thicknesses. Like CW points out if you go too thin it will have too much flex. If you find Baltic Birch test it for rigidity. Tempered hardboard is difficult to work with. Save it for structures like bridges.

 

Pete

On my modules (for the club layout) I used 3/8" plywood over a 1 x 4 frame. They are pretty lightweight (I regularly carry one with each hand) and haven't warped or flexed much in the three years I've had them. They spend about 350 days a year in an unheated garage, so I think that's pretty good.

 

For a 42" wide area, I would add one center brace, so the longest span of plywood would only be 20ish inches. Before assembly, I would paint all the surfaces of the plywood (top, bottom, even the edges) to prevent moisture from causing it to warp. Might as well do the same with the frame while you have the paint out. A can of "oops" paint is really useful for this kind of stuff. Put two coats of whatever color you can find for cheap, and then do a finish coat of the color you like. For that area, most paint stores sell sample cans that hold about a cup of paint. Two would likely cover the top, and another one would probably do the sides of the framing that you will be able to see.

 

Even cheaper than the plywood is OSB. My Permanent layouts are made with 7/16" OSB, which is the same stuff most new construction roofs around here are made of so every lumber yard around has it. OSB has a smooth side and a rough side to it. I used the rough side on mine to give the paint just a touch of texture. (On a roof, you would use the rough side up so you don't slide off the roof, but that's another story...)

 

Hope this helps,

 

J White

 

norton gave the answer that is the most informative and educational. A Baltic Birch plywood of several layers is the best...not osb which has to be able to swell and contract more than plywood  - that's why it is good for wall and roof sheathing.

  Read is used by what several custom O gauge engine turntable makers use.......it's either a many ply plywood ( 7 or 9 or more)...some flat out say baltic birch.

 

      1/2 cdx plywood would be a good economical choice.

 

Even if you don't have to stand, sit, crawl, or walk on your layout, thin cheap plywood will warp. You don't won't your smooth track work to become uneven with dips and slopes, because it will cause derailments. It may not happen right away, but it will happen eventually. Build it strong, and heavy duty the first time, and you won't have to ever worry about it later.  

 

Really not that much weight? There's a lot more weight than you might think, especially when you start adding scenery.

Last edited by Former Member

Good bench substructure design enables the use of thin plywood. My layout has 180 square feet of inexpensive 3/8" thick plywood, and since it was built in 2008 it has not warped.

 

The substructure is 3' x 6' bench modules made of 1"x4" pine with 1"x4" supports across the 3' width 24" on center. The legs are 2"x3" fir and braced. The modules are clamped together, not bolted.

 

The plywood has a covering of 3/8" thick foam with a ground cover of sawdust put down in a liquid mixture of white glue and water. There is no doubt that the plywood has gotten wet while I was putting down the ground cover. Also, the 3' x 6' bench modules I use have supported my 200-pound weight without cracking.

 

I can lift every one of my 3'x6' lightweight bench modules without getting a hernia!

 

By the way, when I want some warping to occur to make the ground cover interesting, I put down some corrugated cardboard and wet it. It warps nicely as it dries, then I add ground cover.

 

Crossing Gates

 

IMG_0457

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Crossing Gates
  • IMG_0457
Last edited by Bobby Ogage
Originally Posted by Laidoffsick:
He updated the question from the original post. We always use 3/4", 5 ply or 7 ply. If you buy the cheapest stuff it will warp. Its the foundation of your layout, so get some good stuff.

Yup. 3/4 inch maple laminate. $45 for a 5x7 at Lowe's. Expensive, yes but . . .

At most it's less than 1% of my hobby investment.

Sits flat on the bench work under it's own weight.

Quality surface paints beautifully.

Easily takes staples for cork roadbed.

Excellent sound quality.

 

You get what you pay for. 

 

I've used both 3/4" and 3/8" in the past, I only use 3/8" now.  I use 1x4 pine to build the underframe with boards 2 feet apart, whatever warpage you get in a 2 foot area is going to be minimal.  3/4" plywood is heavy and expensive and not necessary unless you're not going to support it underneath.

 

Most of my layout is 2 feet wide and I have crawled on it without any problems (I weighed 204 lbs last time I checked).  Like others, I buy the cheapest 3/8" plywood I can get, even if it's already got a warp when you fasten it down to 1x4 underframe that will take some/most/all of the warp out of it.

If using 16" on center grid joists I always used inexpensive plain 1/2" CD sheathing plywood with the best side up. The best side usually has plugs and knot fillers in it. Over the years I have always had either Homasote, Ouietbrace or various thickness of extruded foam covering the plywood---more recently foam as shown in my little attic senior citizen layout[2010 photo].

 

100_1304

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 100_1304
Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

After seeing the large train layout my buddy build with OSB, I built one of my layouts with OSB.

I cannot put my finger on the exact reason, but I did not like working with the OSB, and went back to plywood for my next layout.

IMHO, 1/2 B/C plywood is fine so long as you pick good pieces, and frame it properly.

 

I did another project with OSB a couple of years ago. I found the edges to be very splintery. Had to wear gloves to handle it.

If you want the correct answer to your question, use 1/2" Fir underlayment plywood.  Underlayment has no voids in the plys, which translates to being quieter.  Using 3/4" birch or maple plywood is more than a tad overkill.  If it is that small, maybe make a rigid base out of 1x3 and use homasote or foam. Put green landscape paper over it and a 1x4 wood border on it to stiffen it up and keep it square.  Lighten your load.  Good to go.

Generally, the cheapest 1/2" plywood will warp unless you fix it down on benchwork that has a close framework grid.  Even then it might get wavy.  If you want to use thin plywood, you can increase the mass by using drywall underneath it.  The increase in mass is for vibration reduction.  Personally, if it wasn't for the formaldhyde binder in particle board or OSB, I would definitely use that in place of plywood.  Its density makes it less likely to warp and provides greater mass. Otherwise go for the thickest plywood.

It always is fun for me to read the responses to posts that ask questions on the most optimal methods of enhancing layouts: like materials for platforms, landscaping options, etc.  Usually, instead of providing those unconventional or less expensive options, some folks will simply say just buy the most expensive item or go with the pros on that issue-case closed.  My brother-in-law is notorious for this.  He is an auto technician and when I ask him about problems with a car or how to remedy a problem, he simply says, "You should buy a new car?" Now, that is not responding to the question but rather infusing a value judgment into the discussion.  I think most people on here fully realize that going with the thickest plywood and forgetting about cost in the interest of simplicity deals with that problem expeditiously.  But for those looking for the more efficient and less costly option that completely satisfies their needs without over-kill in buying more than one needs, that response is not satisfactory.  Plus there is the fun of finding unconventional methods that prove to be just as good for them--that's part of the fun!  No one want to pay more for something that can be obtained for less and be just as effective.  It's like the guy who said that it didn't matter to him whether his favorite football  team won the game by three touchdowns or three points, as long as they won.  The effect was the same regardless.  So let's try to explore other options to win the game in model railroading.

Since nothing is forever, you have to ask yourself, am I going to burden my family or someone else who moves into the house some day?

Chances are they don’t want all this crap in the room or basement.

They are probably not buying the home for someone else’s hugh bulky train layout.

By making light weight, strong L or T frames as portable sections, you can take them with you, pass them on or store them away for other family members to enjoy.

I often wonder why most think they need a lumber yard of material and supports for heavey

tonnage.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×