Skip to main content

During the early 1980s, Foster Yeoman, a shipper of large quantities of aggregate materials in the UK, had grown dissatisfied with the performance of existing British Rail locomotives. The company had earlier purchased an SW1001 which was performing well in its intended role as a quarry shunter. With its reputation as a builder of reliable diesel locomotives already well established, EMD received an order for four road locomotives from Foster Yeoman. These locomotives  would represent the first privately owned diesel locomotives to serve in revenue earning service on the nationalized BR network. A derivation of the SD40-2, filling the order required a herculean effort on the part of EMD personnel to come up with a design which would enable the locomotives to be built in a configuration satisfying the restrictive loading gauge of Great Britain. Built in 1985 and placed into service in 1986 (a fifth locomotive was added in ’88), the Foster Yeoman Class 59s set a new standard for diesel locomotive reliability on the UK network. Impressed by the performance of the new locomotives, Amey Roadstone Construction and National Power subsequently placed orders for four and six 59s, respectively, of their own. The Foster Yeoman 59s were built at EMD/La Grange while the ARC and National Power locomotives were constructed at the GMD Canadian plant at London, Ontario.

 

With a rating of 3,300 British HP coupled with a maximum tractive effort in excess of 110,000 pounds at approximately 7 MPH and a continuous 65,000 pound rating at about 15 MPH, the Class 59 has built a reputation as a powerful hauler which makes it well suited for its intended role as a hauler of trains of heavy bulk commodities over routes which can feature fairly severe grades for mainline trackage. In fact, in 1991, 59005 set the European haulage record for a single locomotive when it was assigned a stone train weighing approximately 12,000 tons. Although a total of only fifteen Class 59s was built, the class established itself as arguably the most reliable diesel to ever serve on the mainline in Great Britain. This reputation provided the foundation for the Class 66 which was introduced to the network in the 90s and quickly became the dominant diesel locomotive on the British network with hundreds built but that’s a subject for another thread.

 

Although Class 59 locomotives were delivered as new to just three customers, through acquisition and consolidation, they have worn a wider mix of company names and liveries. The pictures below depict this variety. From top to bottom we have Foster Yeoman, ARC, National Power, Hanson (parent company of ARC),  Aggregate Industries (of which Foster Yeoman is now part), Mendip Rail (a train operating company created by Foster Yeoman and Hanson to increase efficiency of rail operations), English Welsh & Scottish which acquired the rail assets of National Power and DB Schenker which then acquired EWS. One locomotive, 59003, was exported to Germany in 1997. This past August, the locomotive was purchased by GB Railfreight and has been repatriated to Great Britain where it is presently being reconditioned for a return to service.

 

Bob

 

59A

59B

59C

59D

59E

59F

59G

59H

Attachments

Images (8)
  • 59A
  • 59B
  • 59C
  • 59D
  • 59E
  • 59F
  • 59G
  • 59H
Last edited by CNJ 3676
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Thanks a bunch for posting this. Very few people realize the importance of those first 4 Class 59 units and how they eventually revolutionized motive power British Rail. The EMD Engineering ten really had a terrible time "jumping through all the hoops" that the British Rail folks from Derby kept coming up with. For example, Mr. John Yeoman would have like to have dynamic brake on the Class 59s, but since dynamic brake had NEVER been successful previously in England, the Derby Technical Center managers would NOT allow dynamic brake on the Class 59 units. probably worked out for the best, since there wasn't space available for the DB grids and blower anyway.

 

The stories I could tell about that delivery, and all the "resistance" from the Derby Technical Center personnel, would really surprise everyone. 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Thanks a bunch for posting this. Very few people realize the importance of those first 4 Class 59 units and how they eventually revolutionized motive power British Rail. The EMD Engineering ten really had a terrible time "jumping through all the hoops" that the British Rail folks from Derby kept coming up with. For example, Mr. John Yeoman would have like to have dynamic brake on the Class 59s, but since dynamic brake had NEVER been successful previously in England, the Derby Technical Center managers would NOT allow dynamic brake on the Class 59 units. probably worked out for the best, since there wasn't space available for the DB grids and blower anyway.

 

The stories I could tell about that delivery, and all the "resistance" from the Derby Technical Center personnel, would really surprise everyone. 

Regarding the lack of dynamic brakes, my understanding was that because of the very large exhaust muffler there wasn't any room for the dynamic brake grids.

 

Stuart

 

 

Last edited by Stuart
Originally Posted by Stuart:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Thanks a bunch for posting this. Very few people realize the importance of those first 4 Class 59 units and how they eventually revolutionized motive power British Rail. The EMD Engineering ten really had a terrible time "jumping through all the hoops" that the British Rail folks from Derby kept coming up with. For example, Mr. John Yeoman would have like to have dynamic brake on the Class 59s, but since dynamic brake had NEVER been successful previously in England, the Derby Technical Center managers would NOT allow dynamic brake on the Class 59 units. probably worked out for the best, since there wasn't space available for the DB grids and blower anyway.

 

The stories I could tell about that delivery, and all the "resistance" from the Derby Technical Center personnel, would really surprise everyone. 

Regarding the lack of dynamic brakes, my understanding was that because of the very large exhaust muffler there wasn't any room for the dynamic brake grids.

 

Stuart 

That, plus other "stupid requirements", such as the Halon Fire Suppression System! Apparently the older BR diesel units leaked so much oil that fires in the engine room were not uncommon.

 

One item that Bob didn't mention in his initial post was, those Class 59 units maintained 100% reliability for more than 5 YEARS! They worked 5, or sometimes 6, days a week and NEVER failed to complete their daily mission for 5 YEARS. Their maintenance was conducted at night or on weekends. 

Originally Posted by tunelvr7:
Originally Posted by Big Jim:

Good golly Miss Molly, those things are all trucks!

I have always been amazed at the locomotive to truck ratio on the British locomotives.  They remind me of American Flyer GP9s.

...or one of those Brio type wooden trains.

 

Without a side by side comparison with a U.S. loco it is hard to get a true feeling of how big/small they really are. But, just judging by the looks of the size of the trucks, I can see where there could be very little room inside that carbody for dynamic brakes or much more than basic equipment. 

Although not the Class 59, here are 2 photos from an old HO tabletop switching diorama comparing a Mehano Class 66 to a Kato Norfolk Southern SD80MAC.

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

Originally Posted by tunelvr7:
Originally Posted by Big Jim:

Good golly Miss Molly, those things are all trucks!

I have always been amazed at the locomotive to truck ratio on the British locomotives.  They remind me of American Flyer GP9s.

...or one of those Brio type wooden trains.

 

Without a side by side comparison with a U.S. loco it is hard to get a true feeling of how big/small they really are. But, just judging by the looks of the size of the trucks, I can see where there could be very little room inside that carbody for dynamic brakes or much more than basic equipment. 

 

DSC00671

DSC00673

Attachments

Images (2)
  • DSC00671
  • DSC00673
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

They are a very interesting but quite small loco.  I think they are quite interesting, but agree, by the time you put dynamic brakes, etc., in them, they'd be much bigger.  I expect their compact size was a, if not the, major goal when engineers sat down to design them.

They are not quite as "small" as you think, especially when compared to previous British Rail locomotives. The light axle loadings and extremely tight clearances required for operation on BR, makes the Class 59 look like they are "all trucks" (actually that should be 'all bogies' in BR and European terms).

Originally Posted by mlavender480:
Were there any particular problems as far as fitting the diesel engine into such a low-profile carbody? With the large height difference between the class 66 and SD80MAC, it sure looks like there might have been...

No, since the SD80MAC had 20 Cylinder 710 turbocharged prime movers, while the Class 59 had  16 cylinder 645 turbocharged prime movers.

Although I have never actually been inside the cab of a British-built diesel locomotive, photos indicate that they are designed so that the Driver could experience constant discomfort and the maintenance workers could experience difficulty and pain when repairing anything inside the cab.

 

EMD has always set the standard for human engineering in its locomotive cabs, for the operating and maintenance personnel alike.  I would imagine that the British railwaymen were very pleased when these locomotives were put into service.

So when did EMD start using 12-cylinnder 710 engines on the Class 66? I was fortunate to see the last of the Class 66 being built for GBRf last month & they had the 12-cylinder engines.

Class 66 replaced Class 59. I wonder what will replace Class 66 as they will no longer be built for railroads in the UK or in the European Union after Dec 31 because of the Euro Stage IV emissions requirement similar to the stringent EPA Tier IV in the US.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by mlavender480:
Were there any particular problems as far as fitting the diesel engine into such a low-profile carbody? With the large height difference between the class 66 and SD80MAC, it sure looks like there might have been...

No, since the SD80MAC had 20 Cylinder 710 turbocharged prime movers, while the Class 59 had  16 cylinder 645 turbocharged prime movers.

 

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

So when did EMD start using 12-cylinnder 710 engines on the Class 66? I was fortunate to see the last of the Class 66 being built for GBRf last month & they had the 12-cylinder engines.

Class 66 replaced Class 59. I wonder what will replace Class 66 as they will no longer be built for railroads in the UK or in the European Union after Dec 31 because of the Euro Stage IV emissions requirement similar to the stringent EPA Tier IV in the US.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by mlavender480:
Were there any particular problems as far as fitting the diesel engine into such a low-profile carbody? With the large height difference between the class 66 and SD80MAC, it sure looks like there might have been...

No, since the SD80MAC had 20 Cylinder 710 turbocharged prime movers, while the Class 59 had  16 cylinder 645 turbocharged prime movers.

 

All of the Class 66 have the 12-cylinder 710 diesel.

 

Stuart

 

 

Since the new emissions standards were mentioned above, the UK freight operating companies now find themselves in a challenging position. Following years of contraction, British rail freight traffic is rapidly on the rise and the existing supply of operating diesel locomotives is being pressed to its limits. As any of the builders have yet been able to design a locomotive which can accommodate the equipment required by these new regulations in a body of dimensions meeting the UK loading gauge, increasing numbers of older classes such as 37s, 47s, 56s and 60s are being refurbished and returned to service. There is also talk of Class 58s seeing a return to active duty on the British network.

 

Bob      

Originally Posted by prrhorseshoecurve:
Hot water, I read in an article in one of the rail mag rags that the initial FY order was for 10 locos. The EMD rep was so confident that he had FY convinced to only order 5 units because of the reliability. Have you herd about this?

Not true. I can tell you from first hand experience that Mr. John Yeoman had NO preconceived ideas about what EMD power could or couldn't do, ever since he purchased his EMD SW1001 switcher.

 

On the other hand, BS like that COULD have come from the British Rail management at the Derby Technical Center, since BR units were so un-reliable (50% availability?). Thus if four units were actually required to handle that specific level of traffic, then "you better order 10" mentality.

Last edited by Hot Water

As mentioned in my initial post, 59003 had been exported to Germany but GB Railfreight has purchased the locomotive and repatriated it for a return to service in Great Britain. The locomotive has physically returned to the UK and been taken to Eastleigh works for maintenance. From the GBRf Facebook page, I've attached a number of photos of 59003, the first three taken in Germany prior to departure followed by several en route to Eastleigh after arrival in the UK.

 

Bob

 

 

 

 

59003A

59003B

59003C

59003D

59003E

59003F

59003G

Attachments

Images (7)
  • 59003A
  • 59003B
  • 59003C
  • 59003D
  • 59003E
  • 59003F
  • 59003G

After many months, the newly refurbished 59003 has been unveiled by GBRf. Its overhaul completed, the locomotive has returned to service hauling passenger trains as a guest locomotive at the West Somerset Railway. Fittingly, 59003 retains its original name "Yeoman Highlander." Following completion of the preserved railway's gala festivities this weekend, the locomotive will then be placed in regular freight service by GBRf.

 

Bob 

 

59003A

59003B

59003C

59003D

Attachments

Images (4)
  • 59003A
  • 59003B
  • 59003C
  • 59003D

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×