Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Absolutely!!  I hate traction tires especially on steam locomotives....  Many of the  earlier production steamers from the 1980's and 90's used narrow traction tires and thus when the tires broke, the groove in the wheel had no problem negotiating switches however I have noticed that more modern production has a problem with rough riding through switches...

 

Alan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I run with tires, and I replace them when they need it ever since my 1st locomotive lost a tire.  Until I replaced it, it had a hard time pulling just itself around, let alone add 5 cars to it, then it's just spin it's wheels.  It was a MTH PS-1 equipped NYC Hudson.  So to me they have proven to be a necessary evil.  Evil in that I also have a MTH PS-1 equipped NH EP-5 that is out of commission because it threw a tire, and the gears promptly ate it up, seizing the power truck and making it a lovely paper weight.  I still need to take it apart and see if I can save the locomotive.

Don:  I've always replaced the traction tires when they ultimately wear out.  I really do like the performance enhancement they give my engines.  I've tried running some engines without tires but they seem to "List" at an angle and they certainly do not pull as well as those with tires.  My layout has a lot of grades, as steep as 2% or so and so I like the added traction.

 

One of the secrets that I have found is that Weaver has had the best traction tires that I have ever tried.  They actually have a kind of tread on the tire which seems to allow the tire to move a bit in it's grove and therefore adjust to the  best location in the tire groove.  My traction tires last for many hours without needing replacement and do not represent any sort of problem for me at all.

 

Paul Fischer

I never run an engine that is supposed to have traction tires without them. I worry that if I do, it will wear the sharp edge of the groove in the wheel, so when I do replace the tire, it will be more likely to slip out of place. On engines that have repeated problems throwing tires, I use undersized tires and put silicone adhesive in the groove before I install the tire. The service manager for a train manufacturer told me once that he uses super glue - it's so brittle that it's actually easy to clean out of the groove when the tire finally lets go. 

I'm too lazy to remove them until them come off by themselves, but when one of them does I cut the rest off.  

 

I have a Vision CC2 that I bought used and had all kids of vibration problems due to uneven traction tires: the previous owner had apparently oiled them or something.  It runs sooooo sweetly without any, and still pulls very well. 

I've run without them before. If they fall off during a running session, I'll just toss em out and keep going. I've recently been using the Bullfrog Snot without any problems. The only thing I don't like about it, leaving the engines sit, causes flat spots. Then again the rubber tires get flat spots too if they sit that long I guess.

Here is my Williams brass 611 J running without traction tires on the Paradise and Pacific Railroad in Scottsdale on Sunday with 5 21" cars.  6 cars was a little much for the 2% grade down the line, but it ran great in this configuration.  I have run as many as 10 scale cars on a level grade with it this way.  I love how the drivers spin a bit before gripping the rail.  If I had a functional sander in it, it would be great! 

 

I was running it in honor of the real 611 being moved for restoration.  By complete accident the train running on the other track was a 4014 Big Boy.  Interesting coincidence!

 

Attachments

Videos (1)
20140525_125829
Originally Posted by K.C Jones:
Originally Posted by N.Q.D.Y.:

       

(I tend to be mechanically sympathetic.)


       

Does that mean you Baby your stuff?

I have to agree if it came with rubber from the factory...keep it that way.

K.C.

Possibly.   But what I really meant, was that I tend to accelerate and decelerate gently, rather than making rapid changes in velocity. 

Not a long in this as many of you but I've only had issues with tires on one engine.

It had a problem and once I replaced the can motor it was fine (Big Boy w 2 motorized trucks). Several years now and no issues with another tire.

 

Now my Phantom does not have traction tires. It can't pull more than 2 cars on non magnetic track. I will do something to fix that. I already added some weight and it helped, perhaps a LOT of weight...

I've done it. Not fun, but not really all that hard, just a lot of work to take everything apart. In any case it was worth it to get a Premier Cab Forward with PS/2 for 800 bucks. 
 
Originally Posted by mtnhi7:

Has anyone replaced traction tires on a cab forward?? Think about it: the tires are on the drivers that are behind the crosshead guides. Both Lionel and MTH. I can say with certainty that it's a huge PITA.

 

The idea of a "rubber" tire (well, the ones that last are oil-proof neoprene) on a locomotive

is just off-putting to me. They should be banished to starter sets and the like - how

many of us who run $1500 scale locos try to pull a toy-train 6%+ grade? You shouldn't.

 

So, I run them until they come off or rot; I replace them only if the loco/track combination just gets unfriendly without them - usually not a problem. If they are

shown through simple use to be not needed...well, they're, uh, not needed.

 

I do not pull 50-car trains - no room, and I don't abuse my locos. Also, some of those

pesky switch/turnout dead spots are actually Common (running rails) problems, not Hot (center rail) problems, and if you remove the insulating tire from the wheel...bingo.

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×