Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Too late for me, as I'm fairly over-stocked and won't be buying much anymore, but, yes - I dislike traction tires on high-end equipment. I don't care what they put on the low-end and toys. 

=======

Years ago, I seem to recall 3rd Rail resisting the traction-tire feature and offering locos with "carbon steel" tires. My PRR L1 2-10-4 had these tires. The idea was that carbon steel is not very slick and will give good rail adhesion - and be more appropriate for a scale loco - plus there was no possible common-side circuit problem that soft tires can cause. 

They worked well on GG track; I imagine that they were less effective on those 10% toy grades than soft tires, but guys who run 3-rail scale typically don't have that sort of layout.  

Heck yes I would like to see this!!  Of course MTH would have to retool all their steam loco chassis, and Lionel most of theirs as well :-(

Marty is a service tech with great skill and experience (not to mention comprehensive knowledge of, and access to parts.)  For us mere mortals, pulling a Premier or Railking steam loco wheel and pressing another one on IN QUARTER is a daunting task.

What really burns me, is that the manufacturers know better.  When MTH made the jump into HO scale, their steam locos had this feature from the very beginning.  I guess they assume O scalers don't know better, or "they'll buy it anyway."  By my count, in the last 25 years there's not even ONE can-motored steam loco in O scale that can be easily configured to run without rubber tires.  C'mon, build a better mousetrap people!!!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×