Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm sorry to jump in with a ultra basic question, but I thought the Z4K "protected" modern MTH engines from frying. I searched for "TVS" and understand the hazard surges and other dangers present to modern electronics.

 

Can someone help or point me to the correct thread so I can better understand the issues. It looks like I will finally have the opportunity to build another layout in the near future and much has changed since my last major layout thirteen years ago

 

Thank you

 

Paul

Paul

 

The TIU should provide the protection. I no longer have DCS and a TIU so some experienced users should comment if different. For example, if simeltaneously running Legacy/TMCC on the DCS layout, are the engines protected by the TIU units??

 

 

If you want additional TVS units:

You can purchase TVS from Mouser Electronics:   1-[817]-804-3800

catalog #276-1.5 KE 36 CA . This TVS is bi-directional so it wires up either way. They are inexpensive--about $0.50 or less if ordered in volume of a dozen or so..

Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

The TVS does a simple job, it clamps spikes that are greater than it's rated voltage.  It's almost impossible to have too many, so sprinkle them around.   Just kidding.

 

The TIU does have output TVS devices, though I personally recommend installing them in locomotives if you have them open as well.  At a minimum, you should have one installed on every power output from transformers to the tracks.  Obviously, if you don't have DCS, you don't have that output protection either.  If you have accessories with electronics, having one on the accessory output(s) is also a very good idea.

Originally Posted by Railrunnin:

Dewey,

 

Thank you very much for the reply and pictures. I will take your advice and search again the prior threads on this subject. Much appreciated.

 

Paul

Check out this web site. They have a very informative paper on surge protection.

 

http://www.hirailers.org/

 

Also, it is a good idea to put a TVS on each input and output of any of your electrical devices like the Lionel/IC Controls products as well as any accessory that has a circuit board. The price to provide the protection is so cheap it would be crazy not to do it.

 

well, I'm convinced that something can't be stopped!

 

I have a TIU.

 

I use a Powerguard on each output from my 2 trannies, meaning I'm using 4 of them.

 

I have 15A 35 watt fast blow fuses between the trannies' outputs and each TIU input.

 

Considering that I only have a Christmas layout, it seems incongruous that I have had 4 PS2 engines blow boards!  Out of 9 engines.

 

I don't know what's left to do!!??

 

- walt

Originally Posted by walt rapp:

well, I'm convinced that something can't be stopped!

 

I have a TIU.

 

I use a Powerguard on each output from my 2 trannies, meaning I'm using 4 of them.

 

I have 15A 35 watt fast blow fuses between the trannies' outputs and each TIU input.

 

Considering that I only have a Christmas layout, it seems incongruous that I have had 4 PS2 engines blow boards!  Out of 9 engines.

 

I don't know what's left to do!!??

 

- walt

If you read any of the posting from Dale Manquen you would find out that the QSI Powerguard do not necessarily have the same TVS components recommended on many forum threads. Install the correct TVS and forget about voltage spike issues.

This was from the BUY/SELL forum:

 

So, they are no longer still available at $81 + each on the Tin Rail site. I still have two purchased way back in the day from QSI wired on my layout. I sent a third one to Dale Manquen to take a part for evaluation and his report was not encouraging. As a result, [and although I left mine in place], I installed $.45 TVS in each power district for secure voltage spike protection.

IMG_1782

Originally Posted by RailfanRon:

Professor Chaos DZ-2500 switch machines are motor driven not solenoid driven. Now Atlas machines are a different story.

Ron 

Absolutely - it was solenoids on other accessories that were destroying the DZ-2500s!

 

Or at least that's what I think might have been happening.  I was having repeated failures on switches next to a mail drop and barrel loader (not precisely a solenoid, I know, but it still was generating spikes).

 

I put in TVSs (and snubbers for good measure) and have not had a failure since.

Which TVS diodes to use?

I read in this OGR Forum  ( https://ogrforum.com/topic/tvs-over-kill)  that the 1.5KE36CA diode should be used for transient-voltage suppression on model-railroad circuits.

But I read in http://www.hirailers.org/techn...tm#Surge%20Protector that the 1.5KE33CA diode should be used.

"The Microsemi 1500-watt series of bi-directional Zeners contains nominal 33- and 36-volt devices. The breakdown-voltage tolerance on the latter part makes it unsuitable for the above spec constraints, narrowing the choice to a MSC 1.5KE33CA device for the proposed application."


So I am confused.  Can either one be used?   Is one preferable over the other?   I would appreciate some advice on this

/Ralph Platz

After reading this and other threads, and researching elsewhere, I'm still unclear about whether the QSI PowerGuard offers a sort of protection for sensitive DCS or TMCC/Legacy loco boards that adding the "TVS"-type device would not offer.  Having apparently fried the board(s) on my MTH UP 844 yesterday while testing it on some newly wired complex trackage with turnouts (plenty of momentary hesitations and accompanying spikes, I'm sure), the question is "not idle"! No TIU was in the circuit, since only the Z4000 transformer using conventional control was in use.  Can someone comment on this situation specifically? Thanks.

I plan to power my main line through a TPC400 with two 180 PH bricks.  I run both Legacy and DCS, and I will connect my TIU in passive mode for this track.  The main line will be wired for DCS with 9 blocks continuously powered and two blocks switched for on/off operations to park trains.

 

I will have only one of the bricks on for most main line operations.  When I want to run multiple passenger trains with multiple engines I plan to have both bricks powering the main line.  Will the 36 volt TVS, 1.5KE36CA, be sufficient or should I use a different one.

 

Thanks.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by CAPPilot:

I plan to power my main line through a TPC400 with two 180 PH bricks.  I run both Legacy and DCS, and I will connect my TIU in passive mode for this track.  The main line will be wired for DCS with 9 blocks continuously powered and two blocks switched for on/off operations to park trains.

 

I will have only one of the bricks on for most main line operations.  When I want to run multiple passenger trains with multiple engines I plan to have both bricks powering the main line.  Will the 36 volt TVS, 1.5KE36CA, be sufficient or should I use a different one.

 

Thanks.

 

Ron

Yes, install at least one. You can use a 36 volt or 33 volt one as discussed earlier.  Either one will clamp a spike to a safe limit.

 

Dale H

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×