Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by GCRailways:

With huge pieces of that boiler lagging missing, it's hard to see how it could be restored to operating condition.  The 4018 had small holes in its boiler lagging, so there must be more than meets the eye when judging restorability.  I imagine new lagging will be fabricated?

 

 

Aaron

It's the jacketing and only sheet metal.  Lagging is the insulation around the boiler.  In the past, it used to be asbestos. 

 

Any well equipped metal shop could fabricate new jacketing, it's not rocket science.  I seriously doubt that any of the steam locomotives running around today still have their original boiler jacketing.

 

Rusty

Rusty is absolutely correct about the sheet metal Jacketing. In fact, UP 844 has even had her Jacketing renewed at least twice during her "excursion career" alone.

 

The asbestos insulation material  was removed from #4014 many, many years ago. The best way to keep a steam locomotive boiler shell in good condition when "out in the weather" on display was/is to IMMEDIATELY remove the Jacket and asbestos lagging. Some places have even gone through the effort to reapply the sheet metal jacketing with appropriate spacers between the sheet metal and boiler so the it APPEARS that everything is "as it was in the old days". 

 

Over the last 30 years or so, obviously asbestos insulation is no longer used on restored & operating steam locomotives. There is much higher "R Factor" fiberglass material now available, and is also MUCH easier to work with.

Originally Posted by John Mills:

Just suppose they eventually got all three locomotives running.  Does the UP steam program have enough trained personnel to run them all at the same time?

In the event that happened, there are certainly enough trained steam crews in the country that they could make it happen.  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

 quite true I'm sure, but I would think Rich Melvin,Doyale McCormack or the like would be better quialified than most. 

Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

That is just your opinion, right?

Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

Exactly! It's a wonder that the U.P. ever let outsiders in to operate their engines in the first place. Isn't that some kind of Union violation?

Originally Posted by Steamer:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

 quite true I'm sure, but I would think Rich Melvin,Doyale McCormack or the like would be better quialified than most. 

I'm sure that Rich can speak for himself. Since Doyle McCormack (correct spelling), has more than 100 miles at the throttle of 3985 over his home division (between Eugene, OR and Albina Yard in Portland). I'd say that he is one of the VERY few people that could easily AND correctly operate either 3985 or 4014 anyplace on the UP system.

Originally Posted by CRH:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

Exactly! It's a wonder that the U.P. ever let outsiders in to operate their engines in the first place. Isn't that some kind of Union violation?

So,,,,,,who was the "outsider" that ever operated any of the UP steam locomotives?

 

And NO, it isn't a "Union violation", so long as there is a "Union" pilot crew called for the move.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

That is just your opinion, right?

An observation.

Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

That is just your opinion, right?

An observation.

OK, I see. An observation by someone who has a wealth of experience on real steam locomotives, and especially the UP steam program.

 

However, since I retired as a CONTRACTOR for the UP Steam Crew back at the end of 2010 anyway, nothing affects me no matter what they do. Nor does it affect ANY of the former members of the UP Steam Crew, since they are also all gone, as of spring 2013.

Hotwater needs to consider a disclaimer at the end of his posts about the UP, Something like:

 

"The above statements represent the opinions of a former contractor of the UP steam program and may reflect personnel biases and feelings of the writer. Please take them as would take the opinions of any ex-contractor of  a company that may feel they  know better that those currently involved with the company"

Originally Posted by cbojanower:

Hotwater needs a disclaimer at the end of his posts about the UP:

 

"The above statements represent the opinions of a former contractor of the UP steam program and may reflect personnel biases and feelings of the writer. Please take them as would take the opinions of any ex-contractor of  a company that may feel they  know better that those currently involved with the company"

Not a bad idea. But remember that I have NEVER posted anything untrue concerning the current management of the UP steam program.If that disclaimer is OK with Rich Melvin, it's OK with me too!

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Wowak:
  I'm sure experienced hands from almost any mainline engine could be contracted to run on the UP.

 

That has generally NOT been the UP's policy in the past, and I doubt that it would change for future steam operations. Besides, how many people do you think there are out there that are qualified to operate CORRECTLY either 3985, or 4014 in the future? Just because one may be "qualified" on, say NKP 765, or PM 1225, or AT&SF 3751, operating a locomotive like 3985 and/or 4014 is a whole different situation.

You have an axe to grind with the UP steam program.  We get it.

That is just your opinion, right?

An observation.

OK, I see. An observation by someone who has a wealth of experience on real steam locomotives, and especially the UP steam program.

 

However, since I retired as a CONTRACTOR for the UP Steam Crew back at the end of 2010 anyway, nothing affects me no matter what they do. Nor does it affect ANY of the former members of the UP Steam Crew, since they are also all gone, as of spring 2013.

I don't even have to know which end of the locomotive you put the coal in to be qualified to assess your personal bias.  We get it.  You have problems with UP Steam.  Maybe you're right to.  I don't know.  I don't care.  But I am burned out on your negative posts about the 4014.  There's my input.

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
 
 

Not a bad idea. But remember that I have NEVER posted anything untrue concerning the current management of the UP steam program.If that disclaimer is OK with Rich Melvin, it's OK with me too!

Well there is no way to prove or disprove that really, since the UP management doesn't respond to your comments directed towards them.

Well if it hasn't been UP's policy in the past then we will have to see if that policy changes in the future.  This program is like many things...it's evolving and changes occur, some for the better and some not depending on ones feelings towards things.  I guess we will just have to wait and see what we see with regards to this.

Originally Posted by cbojanower:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
 
Not a bad idea. But remember that I have NEVER posted anything untrue concerning the current management of the UP steam program.If that disclaimer is OK with Rich Melvin, it's OK with me too!

Well there is no way to prove or disprove that really, since the UP management doesn't respond to your comments directed towards them.

Actually, that isn't quite true either. The "current manager" has indeed responded to MANY of the posts by me, and former members of the permeant UP Steam Crew, over on TrainOrders.com, and it has all become quite hilarious, over the last 2 to 3 years.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×