Skip to main content

I agree and in a few years engines built in China will become what the production issue was in Korea. Yes for me it was an eye opener but for the quality and product support it was well worth it. Of course now as we been talking about this I just had an SD9 go down and I think for the same reason as the first one did right after It was delivered to my house. Go figure.

Last edited by suzukovich
suzukovich posted:
Eccentric Crank posted:

I agree with everything written.  But on the 3RS or 3R side I think reservations are slow due to $730 a pop, $1460 for a pair.   And it was very common to see these in triples.  It is just too much money.  Not for what you get, but the prices are leaving the 3R or 3RS modeler behind.

I don't think that's the issue. Although I will agree that when I purchased the three SD9s  and the one SD7 the 2800.00 price was an eye opener.  It could also help if maybe Scott offered some none powered units.

It's a very BIG issue to me!
As I said before, in order to have a proper over the mountain road consist, one must have 3 six axle diesels $$$ and 5 four axle diesels $$$$$. Compound that with the fact that I am partial to high-hood diesels, well, that combo puts me straight out of the diesel buying public. Did I mention running multiple trains with diesels? 

Big Jim posted:
suzukovich posted:
Eccentric Crank posted:

I agree with everything written.  But on the 3RS or 3R side I think reservations are slow due to $730 a pop, $1460 for a pair.   And it was very common to see these in triples.  It is just too much money.  Not for what you get, but the prices are leaving the 3R or 3RS modeler behind.

I don't think that's the issue. Although I will agree that when I purchased the three SD9s  and the one SD7 the 2800.00 price was an eye opener.  It could also help if maybe Scott offered some none powered units.

It's a very BIG issue to me!
As I said before, in order to have a proper over the mountain road consist, one must have 3 six axle diesels $$$ and 5 four axle diesels $$$$$. Compound that with the fact that I am partial to high-hood diesels, well, that combo puts me straight out of the diesel buying public. Did I mention running multiple trains with diesels? 

OK you misunderstood me. From the time the SD9s were announced and reservations were being taken, I started putting money on the side each month. It's a big deal for me with 3 kids and bills too. But let's put this into perspective. I just saw the price for the Lionel SD45. At 600.00 x 2 which I would need is 1200.00s. From what I can tell they are only offering one engine in the road I want and no nonpowered unit. For a few dollars more I can get a better detailed engine that is road specific then one that may not be correct for the roads I run. I have bought very few New engines and when I did it was either because the engine and road disappears quickly or I just felt it was worth it. Also I run my engines while quite a few wind up on shelves and collect dust. Now let's talk about service. I just had an engine go tits up. I called to see if I could send it in for repair. After explaining what it did, 3rd Rail sent me a shipping label and engine is enroute. Now if it's warranty work or not I plan on biting the bullet and pay them to fix it. Try that with Lionel or MTH.  Another thing to think about, which I do. 3rd Rail engines are prototypical correct for the roads  produced. Lionel and MTH are pretty much generic. Another factor in my decision process. Bottom line you pay for what you get. 

Once again, I agree with everything eveyone is writing, and you do get what you pay for.  But the problem is paying for excellence has now put me, Big Jim and others out of the market.  BTW C Ro has the Lionel SD45's shipped for $539.  Not a bad model for 3 Railers, Fixed pilot, easy kadee option, road specific details, legacy sounds.  I saw the Lionel new SD40 BN and Conrail models, that did have a number of road specific details that differentiated the two.   BN paint job looked pretty good.  I realize my Lionel scribblings are irrelevant to 2 railers.

Last edited by Eccentric Crank

I went to his Website last night couldn't find them.  Of course now I'm in a bind. I'm in the process of buying parts that I know I will need for the Humvee I bought. Parts are not cheap vs buying the Lionel GN SD45 or picking up the remaining C&S  SD9 and GN FT B unit front 3RD Rail. I am not rich either and have to try to keep with in budget. And since I am also trying to keep my CUCV and not sell it. It's a little rough.

I was hoping for an ex-Missouri Pacific,  Grand Trunk Western SD40-2 in blue, red & white as painted between 1985-1992. 

If the switch is to the GP9 diesel then i wouid have to switch to a Grand Trunk Western GP9 diesel in the 4600 or 4900  number series that was repainted in the blue, red & white scheme between 1980 and 1990. I do not have an accurate scale model of the GTW GP9 with TMCC and RailSounds to operate. 

Andrew 

CBQer posted:

I you go back to the Atlas message site  there were like 200 positives for them to build a GP40-2. They ignored us.

Dick

Dick, still amazed at that... considering they've had such success with them in HO and N and if done right today to handle some of the variations would be an instant top seller considering the improvements they've made in recent years, IMO.  I'm definitely in on the SD40-2's, but also would welcome GP40/40-2's as well as the Canadian Wide Cab variants.   Wouldn't turn down SD38/38-2's either....  

EC, I really like the newer Lionel Legacy offerings, easy conversion to fixed pilot, lengthen the handrails, move the side frames in basically make them look awesome.  If someone made 2R conversions for them that would be awesome!  wheelsets and electrical pickup. 

falconservice posted:

They did not include SD40-2 versions of 

The Grand Trunk Western in red and blue

ex-Missouri Pacific SD40-2s

 GTW 5933 GTW 5937 SD40-2 in 1993GTW 5936 GTW 5937 on SOO or MILW in St. Paul, MN January 28th, 1993

 

The Soo Line in early 1970's white and red with the black SOO

SOO 776 SD40-2

Chicago & North Western in the Falcon Service paint scheme

Chicago & North Western in the Safety Yellow scheme

Andrew

Because no one reserved them.

@GG1 4877 posted:

Non-powered units is a possibility as well.  Needing three powered units in 3 rail is not very common.  Two is usually more than enough.

I agree that only two power units are needed and the three powered 3rd Rail F3 units I bought broke the bank, but I want sound.  I personally don’t like “dead” units in my consists.  However, to get sound requires a powered unit.  This is not a cheap hobby if you want accurate models.

@Mike DeBerg posted:

Dick, still amazed at that... considering they've had such success with them in HO and N and if done right today to handle some of the variations would be an instant top seller considering the improvements they've made in recent years, IMO.  I'm definitely in on the SD40-2's, but also would welcome GP40/40-2's as well as the Canadian Wide Cab variants.   Wouldn't turn down SD38/38-2's either.... 

EC, I really like the newer Lionel Legacy offerings, easy conversion to fixed pilot, lengthen the handrails, move the side frames in basically make them look awesome.  If someone made 2R conversions for them that would be awesome!  wheelsets and electrical pickup.

Well IF you can't buy 'em, Build Em like I did with a Weaver Gp38!

Conrail Gp40-2aConrail Gp40-2bConrail Gp40-2c

Attachments

Images (3)
  • Conrail Gp40-2a
  • Conrail Gp40-2b
  • Conrail Gp40-2c

It seems right now the sweet spot for locomotives is in the range of 1945-1965.

In another 5 years I'm guessing it will progress (extend?)  from 1955 to 1970 or 1972.

Another limiting item may the (probable) larger than 48" minimum radius of the GPs

(Scott doesn't always seem to specify minimum radius if it is larger than 48") which

could be one of the reasons most larger, modern locos have limited appeal.

There are just fewer layouts that can accommodate them.

Last edited by Jim Scorse
@hibar posted:

No question, if Scott does make a reduced run of the SD-40-2 models there will be fewer Road names at higher pricing. JMO

Time will tell. Perhaps ADDING a few choices could add some needed reservations. Add SP, DRG, and CNW and Scott might see a pleasant increase in reservations. Especially the Very popular SP. If some of you could add another reservation, that would move us closer to commerciality. I’ve doubled down my order of two to four. Time to Step Up if you Really Want This model.
Cheers.
TrainBub

@TrainBub posted:

Time will tell. Perhaps ADDING a few choices could add some needed reservations. Add SP, DRG, and CNW and Scott might see a pleasant increase in reservations. Especially the Very popular SP. If some of you could add another reservation, that would move us closer to commerciality. I’ve doubled down my order of two to four. Time to Step Up if you Really Want This model.
Cheers.
TrainBub

The SP and the DRGW never bought SD40-2s, they bought Tunnel motors.  Also, if 10 people reserve 1 each of something new that will do no good.  It is a combination of total numbers and variations.  While 500 reservations would be awesome if it is 50 variations of 10 models that won't work. But 250 identical reservations might.

The railroads to add would be

MISSOURI PACIFIC original scheme, no dynamic brakes

MISSOURI PACIFIC no dynamic brakes, repainted in UNION PACIFIC colors

GTW logo on ex-MP without dynamic brakes, in UP scheme

GRAND TRUNK WESTERN GTW full blue and orange repaint

SOO LINE original 1969 paint scheme

Chicago & North Western 1970's scheme variations



Andrew

@rdunniii posted:

The SP and the DRGW never bought SD40-2s, they bought Tunnel motors.  Also, if 10 people reserve 1 each of something new that will do no good.  It is a combination of total numbers and variations.  While 500 reservations would be awesome if it is 50 variations of 10 models that won't work. But 250 identical reservations might.

Well I’m surprised ALL SP and DRG were Tunnel motors. 😖☹️☹️ Just trying to come up with more options that HELPS  the Commerciality of the project.
Too bad. 🤔

@hibar posted:

No question, if Scott does make a reduced run of the SD-40-2 models there will be fewer Road names at higher pricing. JMO

Scott (3rd Rail) added another "recent" modern offering, the 90s-era C44-9W (same construction as the GP7/9 and proposed SD40-2 [ABS Plastic Shell/Die Cast Frame/Brass and Plastic Detail parts] etc.), which appears to be at a reduced run relative to the SD40-2 and it has a higher price (~$900 ea), which concurs with the included post above.

Scott Kay

@Mike CT posted:

The cost of high end diesels, also adds to the discussion, as we approach $????.00   IMO.   My sweetheart reminds me, often, of the last purchase setting on a shelf.

As far as the price adding to the "discussion", at the end of the day there really is not much to discuss.  The price of a newly tooled and relatively decent road-specific 2-Rail O scale diesel locomotive in the $400 - $500 range, e.g. Atlas Master equivalent, is done, gone, never coming back.  That was the price 20 years ago.  High-end HO scale plastic locomotives are now selling in the $400 range.

Remember, these manufacturers/importers, e.g. 3rd Rail, are pricing these models as best they can to get built at the level we, the modeler, are demanding and not trying to take advantage of us.  They need to keep the factories in China, Korea, Taiwan working to maintain a relationship for their niche model train business to continue so the manufacturers/importers want to meet the minimum quantities as much as we do.  Their pricing just reflects the production costs in the anticipated volume that the model will sell.  It is not like these importers/manufactures have a ton of leverage on driving prices down with their factories.  Just look at Atlas (who does a lot more volume than 3rd rail), over the last 10 years as they have had a number of Asian factories tell them to take their "high volume" business elsewhere.

You will just have to remind your sweetheart that your hobby has revised financial demands that are commensurate with today's economy, or do what everyone else does and have it shipped to a friend and sneak it into the house in an unmarked box .

Scott

Last edited by Scott Kay
You will just have to remind your sweetheart that your hobby has revised financial demands that are commensurate with today's economy, or do what everyone else does and have it shipped to a friend and sneak it into the house in an unmarked box .

If this is how you have act to buy trains for your hobby, you have problems that go far beyond anything financial.

@pitogo posted:

Did Midwestern Model Works deliver their project?  Last I saw them was in the 2012 OSNC.

The last update was over a year ago. I have a model reserved ($950) and I'm wondering if I'll see a model delivered or kiss that down payment goodbye.

I know you enter into these agreements as an open-ended contract where there is no set time frame for when the builder delivers the model but at some point there should be some recourse for the buyer.

I think Erik first mentioned doing an SD40-2 as far back as 2012. The SD45 project has yet to be delivered. Needless to say I'm having some 2nd thoughts.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×