I'm wondering how the Williams SD90 locomotives look with traditional size rolling stock?
I'm assuming the SD90 is a typical well-made WBB product with good conventional operation and a little sparse on the detailing.
I'm thinking about it relative to the Lionel Lionmaster SD90MAC locomotives. I'm a big fan of the Lionmaster SD90, and they look good with my traditional size rolling stock. But, Lionel isn't producing Lionmaster as this time.
Just looking at the figures in the catalogs, the numbers are similar: The WBB engine is 17.75" long and operates on O-31 curves, while the Lionmaster is 17.5" long and operates on O-31 curves. A scale SD90 is 20.25" long for comparison (also O-31 curves).
I don't want to start a Williams vs. Lionel debate (although like many topics, it is probably going to end up there). I'm wondering how the WBB and Lionmaster SD90 are compared to each other in size. Lionel does a good job of selective compression on the Lionmaster locomotives, so it is reduced, not only in length, but also in height and width, compared to a scale locomotive. Looking at catalog photos of the WBB SD90, it looks a little short and blocky, like they reduced the length compared to a scale engine, but perhaps otherwise scale width and height?
But, I haven't seen it in person, so I'm wondering how the WBB SD90 looks with traditional size rolling stock. If it looks huge (like a scale locomotive) next to traditional size cars, than it might not be the best option.