Skip to main content

No doubt this will contribute to any reputation I have for being certifiably crazy, but it makes sense, in a fashion.  

 

This has been a long, three-day 'train' weekend, with my wife working on a project of hers and leaving me to fend for myself.  So two projects: the moving boats on lake, and this: I had to "lower" a brand new shay by .35 inches.

 

Pictures and videos are below.  Also some comments on Lionel's two-truck Shay.  

 

I bought a Lionel Legacy shay specifically for "the fourth" loop on my layout.  It will "own" this loop, being the sole runner on it except for the very occasional interloper.  I added this"bonus loop" (my layout was designed for three loops) last year knowing it would be a very tight (all 36" curves, 6.5 deg climb in places.  But its a fourth loop and fun - its fairly long at 44 feet around) and it twists in and out up and under the other loops.  But there were compromises: in one place only 3.66 inches of overhead clearance (see video).

 

That means BEEPS and BEEFS but not BANGS will run on this loop, Lionel Dockside Switchers and RTR 0-8-0s but not Baldwin 10-wheelers (without modification as to this Shay) or for that matter almost any scale loco.  Unfortunately, none of these locos, that fit, will run really slowly in conventional (all I run).  And all vary speed greatly up and down the 6.5 deg slope.  

 

I wanted a slow, steady runner for this loop.  Hence the Lionel Legacy shay. Unfortunately, out of the box it was just over four inches tall, and over the available 3.66 inches in a seven places.  So, I cut down/removed everything that was over that height and rebuilt the loco.  As I always do if possible, I avoided taking the body off (I studied the loco and the exploded view of it in the Lionel parts listed website for nearly an hour before doing this), and masked everything I wanted no debris and dust to settle.  Then I just set it up well and ran it through a bandsaw (Yes, I know, a brand new loco, but . . . it worked).

 

Below: a picture of the loco just after its run through the bandsaw. 

 

After the cut 2

 

Here it is ten minutes later, with the cut down cab roof and done tops epoxied back on, the bell relocated, etc.  I will have to build a custom coal tray top for the back - cutting the original will not work well, I decided.  I will repaint this as I did my Southern Crescent last week.

Epoxy Hardening

The entire surgery took 22 minutes is all - i.e., I spent nearly three times as long studying and planning for it. 

 

Here is a short video of it on my still very incomplete loop.  It barely clears, by less than a mm.  I have a lot of work to do on the loop, too.  The shay runs on it, but the loop and the say don't like each other: the shay is the longest and heaviest loco, by far, to run on this loop and I'm going to have to reinforce some supports and add some side clearance so it looks good.  But it makes it around the loop slowly and smoothly.  I'll be away for a week - we're taking some vacation, and complete the coal tray and repaint it after we get back.  In the meantime, I know I have myslow shay for this loop.

 

 

 

BTW - it is a nice loco, but rather ugly (I like the cut-down look a lot more).  Everything was perfect out of the box, too.  It has good, interesting sound.  and it does run well, slowly.  Only downside is, this is by far the most difficult Lionel loco I have to get set up well ont he track - more difficult to get settled and square than even a big articulated.  I was surprised by that.  

Attachments

Images (2)
  • After the cut 2
  • Epoxy Hardening
Videos (1)
Barely clears
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:
..... Then I just set it up well and ran it through a bandsaw 

 

Yes!!! Good to hear that someone else uses my favorite kitbashing tool.

 

The ex-passenger car in the photo below didn't run away fast enough and met the bandsaw one evening. I know in an article I described how to do this with a tame little razor saw...but now the truth comes out!

 

Your Shay looks really good on that loop. Sometimes drastic measures are needed to get the most enjoyment from your trains - nothing wrong with that. Excellent job, Lee. 

 

 

band 001

 

Jim

Attachments

Images (1)
  • band  001

I have a K-line 2-truck Shay - the same loco that Lionel sells - and I have always

disliked its "tallness". And I love to cut up locos and remake them.

 

I applaud your efforts - even repainting the Ps-4; it looks so good in black.

 

So - my K-line Shay is on the "List" for a haircut (one day - it's a long list).

I just ran trains for the rest of the afternoon and I love the Shay.  It runs slow even at full voltage, and it is smooth, very very smooth, at a scale 10-15 mph, which for it seems to be half speed.  I love it, and yes, watching the cylinders operate is really fun!

 

This is the first (and so far) only Legacy loco I have that can run on this loop, so this is the first time I have ever had loco with cruise on this loop.  I was surprised that the 6.5% slope (which has some 36 inch curves in it, too, at points) defeats the Legacy cruise feature.  Even more bizarre, its on the downward slope than it gets defeated.  The cruise seems to handle going up well, and it keeps this little loco puffing along at exactly the same heartbeat rate all around the curves and straights, but going down, about halfway down the slope, it breaks out of cruise and the thing takes off - not like a rocket, but for about four feet it accelerates noticeably, then reaches the flat, and then catches itself again.  

 

I'm going to jiggle and play with some slope angles and such and track details to try to alleviate this, but I don't really mind if I have to live with it.  It's a great loco.  I just love it.  

I have no doubt this can handle four degrees, and a bit of a curve, but as I said earlier this loop has to have this really steep incline or it just won't work.  6.5 degrees is the least I can arrange.  

 

A helix would present a potential problem because it is so much of a climb and a long curve - worst of both situations.  I suppose all you can do is test as much as you can and then build it and see.  I would be very interested to hear how it works when you get it done. 

I realize it seems exterme but first, I had experience, and second, it always works out well (so far).  My confidence in this approach, if done carefully, is very high.

 

I had previously done "the bandsaw thing" on an old non-running K-line to exeriment, and then one BANG and two Williams Baldwin ten-wheelers, in order to get them cut down to meet this same overhead requirement on my fourth loop, so I had experience.  In all cases, among other things I was lowering the cab roof about 1/4 to 3/8 inch by cutting down the height of the cab. and on the Williams', also cutting down the sand domes, etc). 

 

All came through the surgery in perfect working order.  The BANG was actually the most difficult: there is a small circuit board that controls the directional lights attached to the underside of the cab roof.  Again I did not remove the body.  I cut only 1/8 inch into each of the sides and the front and the back of the cab, severing the cab roof without taking the blade into the interior of the cab.  I then cut the wires to that light-control board, removed the cab roof, completed the trimming, resoldered the wires and put the cab roof back on a 3/8 inch lower cab .  Everything worked.  

 

The reason I will do nearly anything to avoid taking the body off when I work on, bash, or paint a complicated loco is that the only patient I have had "die on the operating table" is the only Legacy loco in which I took the body off -- in this case to do just repairs.  A Lionel U-boat (UP U-30C) from the 2011 catalog.  It had a bad sound board and I got a new one from Loinel and removed the body to replace it,  but the ABS  plastic was badly warped -- it pinched nealry together in the center, and prevented my remounting the body even with the use of what I thought was a novel special tool I made and a carefully studied process I had thought out.  Eventually, I tried a lot of pressure on the body to keep it straight as I tried to re-assemble it,and  I cracked the body badly.  (So I bought another - the U-boat has the best diesel sound of any model I have heard, and have a lot of good spare parts, at least)

Yes, it is.  I couldn't test it on O-36 curves until I cut it down, and then, or course . . . 

 

 

The ironic thing is that the WBB ten-wheeler I ran instead this after noon, after putting the Shay in the "mistake box", got exactly the same treatment (bandsaw, cutting down to fit under the tunnel) about a monthly earlier.  It runs perfectly.

 

Anyway, . . . .it was a fun project.

Good!  Your experience proves that the Shay can run well o O-36.  

 

I probably just got one that was not quite put together right.  

 

I figure it can't hurt to play with the tiny screws/bolts that hold the drive shafts - it has to be a matter of just a tiny fraction of an inch.  I'll do that next weekend . . . first chance I will have to spend some quality time with my locos . . . 

I looked at mine.  I can tell it binds right around the angle required for O-36, and definately by the time its turned to what would be required for O-31.  

 

 But I have decided not to try to "fix" it.  I have pretty good confidence in my ability to repairing and making things from new, but I know my limits.  I think the drive mechanism in this Shay might be beyond me

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×