Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

For whatever reason Lionel did not market the 9/9E/9U with anything but passenger cars. You will probably have trouble matching the coupler height of a 9E with 200-series freight cars. The 200-series trucks they would have the cars sit ~ ¼" higher than the 9E.
 
Ron M
 
Originally Posted by Sunrise Special:

How does the 9e look with 200 series cars? I'm a bit confused because I've seen MTH catalog the 9e with both the Girard and 418 series passenger cars. Any input or photos would greatly be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Sunrise

 

Originally Posted by Sunrise Special:

How does the 9e look with 200 series cars? I'm a bit confused because I've seen MTH catalog the 9e with both the Girard and 418 series passenger cars. Any input or photos would greatly be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Sunrise

If you think about it, the 418 series passenger cars were sold with the 408 locomotive, which also pulled all the 200 series freight cars.  So the #9, which also came with the 418 cars, would naturally fit with the 200 freights.

 

There's no difference in coupler height between vintage and MTH on the 200 or 500 series freights; I have mixed consists of vintage and reproduction in each series, and they couple right together.

 

Terry, I see you have the Brookside Dairy car from the Burlington Vermont TCA convention in 2008.  My neck of the woods.  Don't see too many of those, but they must be out there. Mine is coupled between vintage 212 gondolas, they're all the same height.

 

david

The Girard, Blue Comet, and State car sets are very similar in design, variations on a theme, and are a kind of progression in that order, each set getting longer and more elaborate.  They're all the same coupler height.  

 

Again, thinking it back through, the Girard car set was also cataloged with the gunmetal gray 392.  And the 392 was cataloged with the Blue Comet cars and the 200 series freights before the 400 came out. So they gotta all be the same coupler height.

 

Of course, the other wild card in this is that some of the larger-sized locos came through with a drop coupler for the smaller cars:  I have a 400 with a drop coupler on the tender that pulls my 500 series freight, even though the 400 was never sold with the 500's or the smaller 300 series passenger cars.  Don't know if that's the case with the #9 but it's possible.

 

Are you sure the coupler on your 400E is really a "drop" coupler? The coupler on the Lionel Classics 400E is at the height of the 500 series cars - we have one at our museum. As I understand it, the difference in height between the 200 and 500 series cars is a function of the difference in wheel diameter, and the 400E tender has 500 series wheels. I don't know about the original 400E and the 200 series cars in the sets, if the coupler was different or what. It doesn't look like there would be room in the six-wheel tender truck for 200 series wheels. I'd like to see a photo of an original tender coupled to an original 200 series car. I've been told there were two different couplers, but I've also seen it posted on this forum that there was only one coupler and if you mixed the two types of cars you just had to bend the couplers until the height matched. 
 
Originally Posted by hojack:

The Girard, Blue Comet, and State car sets are very similar in design, variations on a theme, and are a kind of progression in that order, each set getting longer and more elaborate.  They're all the same coupler height.  

 

Again, thinking it back through, the Girard car set was also cataloged with the gunmetal gray 392.  And the 392 was cataloged with the Blue Comet cars and the 200 series freights before the 400 came out. So they gotta all be the same coupler height.

 

Of course, the other wild card in this is that some of the larger-sized locos came through with a drop coupler for the smaller cars:  I have a 400 with a drop coupler on the tender that pulls my 500 series freight, even though the 400 was never sold with the 500's or the smaller 300 series passenger cars.  Don't know if that's the case with the #9 but it's possible.

 

 

Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
 a function of the difference in wheel diameter, and the 400E tender has 500 series wheels.

 

 

Could be, that's a different question. I was focused on the 9E/Girard car/200 series freight question and the subject of the 400 on the 500 freight was an afterthought.  I'd have to look sometime.

 

david

 

The 9E should will work fine with the 200 series freights. It was utilized with the larger passenger cars like the Girard cars. The #8 would have been used for the 500 series freights as it also handled the small passenger cars.

 

As for the 400E, the odd part of that loco is that the tender does not line up with 200 series freights. I can't remember if it's too tall or short, but it does not match.I don't recall a factory tender that used a drop coupler for use with smaller cars.

 

The 390 was the only loco that I know of that was available with 2 different tenders: 390T with 500 series trucks  for 500 freights and the 390TX with 200 series trucks for 200 series freight cars.

 

ARNO

 

Thanks for all that have replied...I see that the #9 matches the 200 series cars.  What's confusing is that the MTH Comet 400e matches the comet cars, and as hojack has stated are the same coupler height as the girard and state cars. The comet 400e will not match up with 200 series cars or the 418 passenger cars. I learned this the hard way with my LCT red comet 400e.I was hoping to pair it with my circus 200 series cars but the couplers are not aligned.  So...how can the #9 match the 200 series cars and the girard cars at the same time?  Now just to decide on the orange or grey. Perhaps the grey is a little more versatile but I do like bright colrs in tin. Decisions Decisions!!!

 

Sunrise

 

Sunrise

Last edited by Sunrise Special
Originally Posted by F&G RY:

Two different coupler types. Lionel must have done something with the couplers to make the sets match.

Yes : some of the larger-sized locos came through with a drop coupler for the smaller cars.

 

But, I'm not aware that there were "two different coupler types". Can anyone produce evidence of two different Lionel Standard Gauge latch couplers? However, they dropped the coupler.  This is not determined by the wheel size.  Not all cars with 200 series wheels have the same coupler height.

 

Please notice that there are different and conflicting responses thorughout this thread:

- Terry posts picture of 9E coupled to 200 freight and says they hook up fine.

- Ron states 9E will have trouble connecting to 200 freight.

- SWHiawatha notes 400e tender lines up with 500 series freight.

- Arno states 400 tender does not line up with 200 series freight.

- RideTheRails says 400e does line up just fine with 200 series freight.

- JimC says 9E does not match 200 series freight.

- JimC says 9E mates with 418 cars (which have 200 series wheels.)

- everyone agrees 9E matches Girard cars which have 500 series wheels.

 

david

 

So let's see some photos! Preferably closeups showing the connection between the locomotive (or tender) and 200, 500, and passenger cars. It would be especially interesting to see any photos of an original 400E pulling 200 series cars in the original set. I'm afraid I can't be of any help here, as most of my Standard Gauge is modern and repro. The only original locomotives I have are 8, 10, and 390E, all of which are set up at the lower height for 500 series cars. 
 
Originally Posted by hojack:
Originally Posted by F&G RY:

Two different coupler types. Lionel must have done something with the couplers to make the sets match.

Yes : some of the larger-sized locos came through with a drop coupler for the smaller cars.

 

But, I'm not aware that there were "two different coupler types". Can anyone produce evidence of two different Lionel Standard Gauge latch couplers? However, they dropped the coupler.  This is not determined by the wheel size.  Not all cars with 200 series wheels have the same coupler height.

 

Please notice that there are different and conflicting responses thorughout this thread:

- Terry posts picture of 9E coupled to 200 freight and says they hook up fine.

- Ron states 9E will have trouble connecting to 200 freight.

- SWHiawatha notes 400e tender lines up with 500 series freight.

- Arno states 400 tender does not line up with 200 series freight.

- RideTheRails says 400e does line up just fine with 200 series freight.

- JimC says 9E does not match 200 series freight.

- JimC says 9E mates with 418 cars (which have 200 series wheels.)

- everyone agrees 9E matches Girard cars which have 500 series wheels.

 

david

 

 

May I put this coupler discussion to rest, Lionel ONLY used TWO coupler designs for their Standard Gauge line.
 
The part no. CP-8 was used on the 248, 251, 251E, 252, 252E, 253, 253E, 254, 254E, 8, 8E, 10, 10E
 
The part no. CP-21 was used on the 9, 9E, 256, 318, 318E, 380, 380E, 402, 402E, 408, 408E. All Standard Gauge Tenders and Cars.
 
(Extracted from the Nov. 1939 "A Complete List of Lionel Replacement Parts")
 
 
It should be noted that Lionel only used TWO sizes of wheels for their Standard Gauge cars and tenders. The smaller size was part no. 9T17 and the larger size, used on the 200 their freight cars, was part no. 319T15.
 
Remember they were in the business of making money and the fewer of different parts are used the greater the profit.
 
Ron M
 
 
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
So let's see some photos! Preferably closeups showing the connection between the locomotive (or tender) and 200, 500, and passenger cars. It would be especially interesting to see any photos of an original 400E pulling 200 series cars in the original set. I'm afraid I can't be of any help here, as most of my Standard Gauge is modern and repro. The only original locomotives I have are 8, 10, and 390E, all of which are set up at the lower height for 500 series cars. 
 

 

 

Last edited by ron m
Originally Posted by ron m:
 Lionel ONLY used TWO coupler designs for their Standard Gauge line.
 
The part no. CP-8 was used on the 248, 251, 251E, 252, 252E, 253, 253E, 254, 254E, 8, 8E, 10, 10E
 
The part no. CP-21 was used on the 9, 9E, 256, 318, 318E, 380, 380E, 402, 402E, 408, 408E. All Standard Gauge Tenders and Cars.
 
(Extracted from the Nov. 1939 "A Complete List of Lionel Replacement Parts")
 

Agreed.  And the only difference between CP-8 and CP-21 is the length of the shank. Using one or the other coupler does not alter the height.

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
So let's see some photos!

 

I do not have a vintage 400E.

 

I would be cautious drawing conclusions.  I would very much like to see a closeup photo of Terry Hudon's 9E coupled to the cars he shows in the earlier photo.  

 

I have always argued that it is the nature of tinplate not to be very precise; there is a lot of "slop" in the connections, and there is also a lot of variation between units.

 

In your replies, please be careful NOT to re-post all the photos, delete them from your reply before posting or this thread will become impossible.

 

In no particular order:

 

 

PICT0001

PICT0006

PICT0007

PICT0008

PICT0009

PICT0010

PICT0011

PICT0012

Attachments

Images (8)
  • PICT0001
  • PICT0006
  • PICT0007
  • PICT0008
  • PICT0009
  • PICT0010
  • PICT0011
  • PICT0012
Last edited by Former Member

As soon as you start comparing reproductions with originals all bets are off.  Even if you stick with strictly original Lionel SG there are more than just 2 coupler designs.  The 2 distinct differences in coupler height (200 vs 500) make mating them difficult if not down right impossible in some circumstances.  Same can be said with the earlier 10 series cars vs the 100 series.

 

Note pics above...all shanks show some sign of bending for adaption.

 

Bruce

Last edited by brwebster
Originally Posted by brwebster:

As soon as you start comparing reproductions with originals all bets are off.  Even if you stick with strictly original Lionel SG there are more than just 2 coupler designs.  The 2 distinct differences in coupler height (200 vs 500) make mating them difficult if not down right impossible in some circumstances.  Same can be said with the earlier 10 series cars vs the 100 series.

 

Bruce

"As soon as you start comparing reproductions with originals all bets are off."

This is not known.  But since there are no problems coupling same-series vintage and MTH(Lionel) equipment to each other, it is very likely that the reproductions match the originals in coupler height.

 

"Even if you stick with strictly original Lionel SG there are more than just 2 coupler designs."

We are talking about the Lionel Standard Gauge latch coupler.  Please substantiate any claim that there are more than the CP-8 and CP-21, or that there is any difference in the shape (other than shank length) of the coupler itself.

 

"The 2 distinct differences in coupler height (200 vs 500) make mating them difficult if not down right impossible in some circumstances. "

Yes, I don't believe there is any disagreement there.

 

 

 

In the last series of photos, it looks like the 400 tender and the 200 freight will not couple.  In fact, they do, and nothing binds.  However, with just a little difference in how tight the mounting rivet is fastened, or in the bend of the couplers, they would not couple.  I believe that much of the variation in experience is due to the wide variation tolerances inherent in tinplate.

 

 

david

Last edited by Former Member

you're welcome Terry, it wasn't very hard.

 

It certainly looks to me that the couplers on the 200 series freight are much higher than the couplers on the 429 (418/428 series) car, which also have the 200 series wheels.  So using 200 series wheels does not result in consistent coupler height; variations in trucks, body design, and coupler mount seem to contribute also.

 

Back to the original post in this thread by Sunrise Special: The 9E (and also the 400E tender) can reach the 429 car, but it has a much harder time reaching the 200 freights which are higher.  

 

d

 

Last edited by Former Member

 

 

""Even if you stick with strictly original Lionel SG there are more than just 2 coupler designs."

We are talking about the Lionel Standard Gauge latch coupler.  Please substantiate any claim that there are more than the CP-8 and CP-21, or that there is any difference in the shape (other than shank length) of the coupler itself."

 

The commonly known transitional combination coupler.  There was a slot in the lower plate that allowed new engines the ability to couple to earlier hook type equipment.  And if CP-8 and CP-21 were different only in shank length then what's that chances that a combo coupler had 2 lengths too?  Old parts books represent what was on hand at the time of printing...not what came from the factory.

 

 

 

Bruce

 

 

Last edited by brwebster

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×