Skip to main content

One of the things that really bothered me about the new Atlas CZ car was the
protruding coupler that is so prominent at the rear.  I decided to replace
the Atlas coupler with the new Kadee #740 scale coupler.  I cut off the
coupler's "tail" and painted it with some Floquil aluminum I had on hand.  I
also mounted it farther in than the Atlas coupler.  I think this simple
change makes for much better scale appearance.  Now I need to find some air
and steam hoses.
Bob


imageimageimageimageimage

Attachments

Images (5)
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
Last edited by Erik C Lindgren
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hey Erik:

 

Nice changes, but I do think if you (or anyone else) is going to do this coupler change, it would be better to use the Proto-Craft coupler.

 

http://protocraft.com/category...9C3-7A25ECA1C24EAEAE

 

Operationally the Kadee is fine, but the look of the Proto-Craft is so much nicer.

 

Did CBQ paint the couplers like SF did? In some pictures it sure looks like silver has been painted on the coupler.

 

Thanks.

 

Charlie

Originally Posted by Charlie:

Hey Erik:

 

Nice changes, but I do think if you (or anyone else) is going to do this coupler change, it would be better to use the Proto-Craft coupler.

 

Charlie

Charlie,

 

I kind of agree with you about the realistic appearance of the Proto-Coupler, but maybe Erik (or Bob for that matter...) wanted the capability to pull the train from the rear end and thus Kadee was the right choice.

 

Yves

Hi Erik,
Thanks for posting my photos.  I agree that using a scale Protocraft coupler
might be a better choice for appearance and may change out the Kadee to one
of those, but for now I think the new style Kadee looks fine.  I don't have
a Protocraft coupler on hand but I do have some of the old Clouser couplers
which are pretty much the same thing.  Might give it a try.
I painted the coupler aluminum since old photos show they did paint the
coupler on the rear of the Obs.  Normally, painting couplers was a no-no on
the railroad.
Bob
These cars are marvelous . Baring all the delay stuff. The fit and finished of the tooling is just amazing. How do they do it for $180?

I want to super detail one- real screening and upgraded interior. In time I will.

Jerry Kimble you did good man!

So what's the next train going to be in Atlas's Master Passenger line??

1947 Hiawatha? Skytops, Superdome....
1955 Empire Builder the dome is done
Budd Big Domes for the EB
North Coast Limited Budd domes
Wabash Bluebird Budd domes

Lots of options. I would keep up the moment on this.imageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimageimage

Attachments

Images (17)
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
Last edited by Erik C Lindgren

Thanks for mentioning the Blue Bird.  I had considered trying to use unlettered CZ cars for the Blue Bird but I didn't feel I could successfully remove the skirting.  

 

Years ago someone at Atlas told me the molds were designed to be modified, and that after they got the CZ out of the way the skirting at the trucks would be removed.  I've got my fingers crossed.

  

TRN-M0211_24

  

Can't you just see your Key PA sitting next to the Blue Bird?

 

GL131209-1

Attachments

Images (2)
  • bb1
  • pabb
Last edited by marker
Howard speaking of the ATSF PA's I had put them on exhibit at the TECO train show in Colorado Springs yesterday. I knew they would reel him in.... Guess you stopped in to say hi but Jack Hutchens! I'm not sure if you know Jack he is one of the godfathers in our hobby. He's worked with all of the manufacturers in most scales since the Varney era! Close friend with John Allen too! Anyway it was neat talking with him about the early days of brass importing. imageimage

Attachments

Images (2)
  • image
  • image
Last edited by Erik C Lindgren

Howard, I haven't researched the dome observation car used on the Blue Bird, but it appears to differ from the CZ dome observation car in two respects.  First, the offset of the domes seem to differ with the CZ dome being clearly offset to the rear while the BB seems to be centered or slightly forward. 

 

Second, the CZ dome roof is higher in the rear of the dome, while the BB dome roof appears to be of uniform height; i.e., roof height is the same fore and aft of the dome like a non-observation car dome car.

 

Would these differences pose significant manufacturing difficulties for a Blue Birddome observation car?

 

 

It's obvious Carl tooling a new body would  be required just like Budd did with the body configuration. The basics here are already done. Dome, fixtures, equipment. The rear tooling is not that different either. Yes the Blue Bird was a very different train along with every other in that era. Amtrak uses a carbon copy system on its fleet.

Originally Posted by Pingman:

       
Howard, I haven't researched the dome observation car used on the Blue Bird, but it appears to differ from the CZ dome observation car in two respects.  First, the offset of the domes seem to differ with the CZ dome being clearly offset to the rear while the BB seems to be centered or slightly forward.

Second, the CZ dome roof is higher in the rear of the dome, while the BB dome roof appears to be of uniform height; i.e., roof height is the same fore and aft of the dome like a non-observation car dome car.

Would these differences pose significant manufacturing difficulties for a Blue Birddome observation car?


Last edited by Erik C Lindgren

Carl - Sorry I missed your post.  You and Erik are correct, the observation is different.  Personally, I only paid any attention to that in the last year.  Before that I saw a difference in the glass area of the dome.  Then I realized the roof was higher.  

 

I don't know how modular the Atlas molds are and with the way MTH has backed off creating any new molds for American prototypes, I don't know what it would take for Atlas to do an accurate Wabash Dome/Observation and how many other D/O's for other roads would have a similar roof/dome configuration.  

 

My understanding is that the molds they have, allow different side window configurations.  I don't know if the wheel skirts are a one time change that can't be reversed.  I don't know how modular the roof molds are.  I hope Atlas is able to produce cars for other railroads with same accuracy they have used to produce the CZ cars.  Nothings perfect, but I think Atlas did an excellent job producing the first accurate passenger cars in plastic.  That includes the few issues like the trucks and different paint issues that were caused by changing factories.  

Funny looking skytop as a very accurate CZ dome obs.

Of course that's absurd.  However the Canadian Pacific dome roof isn't that far off the CZ dome/obs.  The molds might be able to be tweaked to produce the CP dome.

 

Walters produced molds for one train and then offered separate sale cars for other roads.  Of course they didn't offer the Sky Top observation for the San Francisco Chief.  

 

In fact Sunset produces a something like a 4-4-2 streamlined sleeper and labels it for as many roads as reasonable.  They aren't totally accurate with each passenger car, especially in plastic.  I would be surprised if Atlas has the money to do new molds for each car on each train, but perhaps I missed your point.  You are also missing mine if you think I'm saying Atlas would use a Budd passenger car mold to produce what should be Pullman Standard, ACF or other non-Budd car.   

 

 
Last edited by marker

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×