Skip to main content

I have seen a number of great looking layouts in person and on the forum, and there is a wide range of the color of ballast used.  There is a range of very nice commercial products, and other products people have applied, this is NOT a question of your material... kitty litter, fish tanks rock, chicken grit, commercial o scale ballast....  My question is , what color, or mix do you prefer, and if you have a preference, could you share a photo.   

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm not a believer in salt and pepper coloration of a blended ballast. I want definite colors to denote mainline and another for lesser trackage such as shown in this photo. The main uses a nice version of limestone and the passing siding uses a color similar to a cinder ballast. Both from Brennans Better Ballast if your shopping for some.

Ballast Colors

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Ballast Colors
Originally Posted by flanger:

I'm not a believer in salt and pepper coloration of a blended ballast.

 

 

Neither am I. The variation in color of real ballast would not be visible at the scale distances at which we view our ballast. Natural shadows and highlights in our over-sized ballast particles provide enough variation IMO.

 

Also, I vary the color on different parts of the layout. For example, red rock country on my layout has brownish ballast while the eastern part has gray.

 

I use the standard method of ballasting. Spread ballast. Spray thoroughly with wet water. Soak with dilute 1:1 white glue mix.

 

 

b 002

 

 

b 001

 

Jim

Attachments

Images (2)
  • b  001
  • b  002
Last edited by Jim Policastro

I'm using 3 parts woodland scenics grey, to 1 part light grey, (essentially white). I initially started ballasting with just the grey but it looked a bit bland,adding a bit of the light grey really makes the ballast "pop",and looks much better to me. When I weather the track I plan to "wash the ballast" as Jim has suggested to tone down the "salt and pepper" effect. Regardless, at least here in the heart of the midwest,the Chicagoland area, there are any number of ballast colors, some just plain white,to the most extreme mix of color of red, orange, brown, and grey, almost like decorative landscape rock. I personally don't think any blend of color would be "wrong". I'm guessing railroads use whatever is available in a particular area.

Originally Posted by flanger:
Originally Posted by Vulcan:

I use a gray blend of light and medium. Because that's prototypical for this neck of the woods.

 

Is that salt 'n' pepper?


Nope...

 

But let me see a picture just to be sure.


This is the best I could do. I don't seem to have pictures where I concentrated on the ballast.

 

I would like to offer my exception to the "blended" ballast discussion. I model the Fernwood Columbia & Gulf, a Mississippi shortline. I walked many miles of their track as a teenager. Although there was very little ballast that was visible, it was blended. I believe the reason for this was that new ballast was added as needed and smoothed out and blended with the old dirty ballast. In some instances gravel was added to the mix because it was readily available.

 

The GM&O used gravel on many south end sections of their rails. It was a bad decision because it held water and rotted the ties much faster.

 

I also remember walking the IC in south MS and it was all gray ballast that was fairly well maintained. That ballast was pretty much all the same shade, in other words it did not appear to be blended.

 

I love discussions like this,

Malcolm

Originally Posted by Brother_Love:

I would like to offer my exception to the "blended" ballast discussion. I model the Fernwood Columbia & Gulf, a Mississippi shortline. I walked many miles of their track as a teenager. Although there was very little ballast that was visible, it was blended. I believe the reason for this was that new ballast was added as needed and smoothed out and blended with the old dirty ballast. In some instances gravel was added to the mix because it was readily available.

 

The GM&O used gravel on many south end sections of their rails. It was a bad decision because it held water and rotted the ties much faster.

 

I also remember walking the IC in south MS and it was all gray ballast that was fairly well maintained. That ballast was pretty much all the same shade, in other words it did not appear to be blended.

 

I love discussions like this,

Malcolm


Blended in a subtle way such as shown above on Vulcans railroad is quite commonplace. I think the hard hitting black/white appearence unless very carefully addressed will come off looking like a decoration instead of a prototype maintenence material. I have areas where I end one color and start blending in a different one since the prototype will do such treatment when they make track repair and use whatever ballast was available without regard to color matching. Ballast can definitely be a complimentary scenic material, but also can spoil otherwise interesting trackwork...some thought beyond just what was cheap and available is very worthwhile in the end.

 

Bob

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×