Skip to main content

Has anyone ever had "cowcatcher clearance" issues with locos they make or buy that have prototypical clearances in front?  I had never given it any thought until I had problems withwith one I am building this morning

 

I'm doing a serious bash project on a LC+ Hudson, transforming it into a much larger, and very scale version of a 2-6-4 steamer of a type I think will be particularly handsome.  More details can be found on my thread about the project on the new LC+ forum here, 

 

https://ogrforum.com/t...ons-for-my-next-bash

 

I ran the loco some this morning in a lengthy test.  It is complete if not yet cosmetically finished.  I was shocked when I got sparks - the cowcatcher was so low that when the loco went over places where the track begins an incline up, or at the bottom of a climb as the track levels off, the front of the cowcatcher would hit the center rail and for a brief time there was a short circuit.  

 

Here is the photo of ATSF 3751 I used for guidance in size and such (along with my Legacy version sitting next to me) while making the new body and all for my LC+ bash.  Note the small prototypical clearance in front . . . I patterned the one I made for my bashed loco on this cowcatcher and its clearance.  By the way: I swear that looks like Wilford Brimley.  I never thought of him as a "railroad person," but now that I think of it . . . 

Slide5

 

Here was my bashed loco prior to its first test run this morning, with its original, near-prototype clearance.

Slide6

 

After seeing the sparks, I checked the clearance of my other, "store bought" locos and noticed all are a bit higher than what you see in photos of real locos.  Here is my Vision Hudson.  The Legacy 3751 is the same.  

Slide7

 

Here it is after modification to match the clearance of the two Lionel locos.  It runs fine now.

Slide8

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Slide5
  • Slide6
  • Slide7
  • Slide8
Last edited by Lee Willis
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think that it would be better if you fixed the track, and not the individual locos. One problem with both Lionel and MTH is that the clearance from the bottom of the pilot casting to the top of the rail is way too much, and I believe that it detracts from the overall look of the locomotive. Neither of these manufacturers include provision for movement or add springs to the axle boxes of locomotives, so this should make the job easier. Perhaps they could just make this change in their premier, etc. offerings.....

My opinion.....

Hello, Lee.

 

I must say from the smoke box, it looks to be a great locomotive.  I can't wait to see it when its done.

 

Although I haven't had this issue with my steamers, I don't run them as much as I should.

 

As for diesels, I do see that they run high, and I believe it is because of this scare that the pilots do run high.  Personally, I've become used to it as I'm already overlooking other things, but I have indeed noticed it.

 

At first, when designing the ride height of my work, I used the trip pin height on the Kadee coupler height gauge.  But after some issues like yours, I decided to use the 0.025" higher step next to the trip pin space on the gauge.

 

 

IMG_1115

image

Side by side

FP_Front

RS-1a

 

The Lionel GP30 is the lowest pilot that I've done, and basically was a metal straight edge across the tracks for the height, which corresponds to the foot boards being at the trip pin height.  It runs well on my layout, and its super elevated curves (yes, the trucks clear the pilot).

 

Just my thoughts...

 

Thanks,

Mario

Attachments

Images (5)
  • IMG_1115
  • image
  • Side by side
  • FP_Front
  • RS-1a
Originally Posted by Hudson5432:

I think that it would be better if you fixed the track, 

I can't fix the track.  It is smooth and level, but I have to change slop going in and out of climbs, and that means the track has to have an angle in it, even if I allow a good long length to make the transition.  As JohnS observed "there are certain things you have to give up when running on a toy train layout and cow catcher height is one of them."

"Cowcatcher clearance"? I had my Visa out all ready to order a Bag-o-Pilots.

 

Anyway, yes, when we have a model world, -especially- with a center rail, that pilot

just can't be as down and dirty as we would like. Some are higher than others, especially

on the "cheap" starter sets (first-grader track laying can be casual), but most of the

more scaley locos are pretty good. Plenty good; it's all about compromise, like life.

===

 

colorado hirailer -

 

The 2-6-4 is not a fantasy arrangement, but rare in N. America. Can't think of any

besides some commuter tank locos. But they did exist. I believe that the 2-6-4 has/had

some currency in Europe and Asia.

 

It even seems to have had a name: have seen it referred to as an "Adriatic" type. I forget in what publication.

 

 

Last edited by D500
Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by CentralFan1976:

There is a trick of putting some tape on the bottom of the cowcatcher, if I remember correctly.

Aargh! They are NOT "COWCATCHERS!!

 

They are "pilots."

 

Geez...this is worse than "lashup."  

 

I'm sorry... I did do that on purpose.

 

If you notice my original post, I did not use the offending word.

 

On the other hand, I was not joking about the use of some sort of protective material on the bottom of said pilot.  I remember hearing of tape or super glue or clear finger nail polish being used as an insulator for occasional center rail contact.

 

What about electrically isolating the whole pilot assembly, much like Alex did with his antenna bell?

 

Thanks,

Mario

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

For what its worth, the FRA regulations specify a minimum clearance of 3 inches from the bottom of the pilot to the top of the rail, and a maximum of 6 inches.

 

1/16"-1/8" in O scale (0.0625"-0.125").  That is indeed the trip pin height on the Kadee gauge. Picture courtesy of Kadee.com.

 

#805 Coupler

 

That is not a lot.

Last edited by CentralFan1976
Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by CentralFan1976:

There is a trick of putting some tape on the bottom of the cowcatcher, if I remember correctly.

Aargh! They are NOT "COWCATCHERS!!

 

They are "pilots."

 

Geez...this is worse than "lashup."  

 

Well, terminology varies with layout.  

 

They were "cowcatchers" when I was six.

 

They were "cowcatchers" when each of my three boys were six.

 

The are still "cowcatchers" now that I am sixty-six, 

 

and will be, here, ever more: there is comfort in things that don't change.

 

Pilots?  They fly airplanes. 

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

Interesting.  I had a scale 5 inches clearance.  Now I have just less than a scale foot. It's like the hi-rail wheels and flanges - just have to live with it.  

I think the comment about how far the first drivers are from the pilot was probably dead on. 

 

I did like lashing up the cowcatcher, that was pretty funny.

 

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:
Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by CentralFan1976:

There is a trick of putting some tape on the bottom of the cowcatcher, if I remember correctly.

Aargh! They are NOT "COWCATCHERS!!

 

They are "pilots."

 

Geez...this is worse than "lashup."  

 

Well, terminology varies with layout.  

 

They were "cowcatchers" when I was six.

 

They were "cowcatchers" when each of my three boys were six.

 

The are still "cowcatchers" now that I am sixty-six, 

 

and will be, here, ever more: there is comfort in things that don't change.

 

Pilots?  They fly airplanes. 

This is how you obtained your PE License?

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
This is how you obtained your PE License?

In a way yse, although I don't think the term was on the test forty years ago.  Last year we gave a presentation to executives at a utility about the power system we had designed for them that would feed the new electric transit trains in their city, and we and they used "cowcatcher" to discuss the pilot of the locos when talking about track sensors for the trains (the sensors for their smart feed system are mounted on the underside of a a cabinet on the left side in the pilot at each end of the train.  Just common sense to use a term your customers will understand: everyone knows cowcatcher, few know pilot.  

 

Back to toy trains:  I have no problem with folks who want to use all the right railroad terminology including the slang, but I'm not into that: to me they are toys not really related very much to real trains.  Cowcatcher communicated well,  just as "lash up" does, too. 

 

BTW-  I'm not a PE since the first of the year.  I'm retired now: not paying several hundred dollars a year for licenses I don't need.  

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Lee Willis
Originally Posted by colorado hirailer:

You put "cowcatcher" in quotes, as I have. 

 . . . . I am still curious as to whether the Santa Fe had 2-6-4's (Adriatics?) and as to what is that white material you are using to reshape the smokebox?   Is that styrene?  (I thought 2-6-4 might be a typo)

First, yes, I put it in quotes: unofficial term, its a pilot, actually,  but . . . 

 

No, Santa Fe had no Adriatics I know of, but its a great fantasty loco. I've built it purely on aesthetics -- what looks good.  

 

As to the bashing.  It is it white, it is sheet styrene (Plastruck).  If it is clear is is polycarbonate tube.

In the days of link-and-pin couplers, cowcatchers were long and heavily constructed to push cows and other obstructions off the track and prevent derailments. A long rod with a hole at the end for a pin was anchored in the pilot beam and rested along the center. It was raised to a horizontal position to couple a car, a locomotive or a tender in front.

 

When knuckle couplers came along, cowcatchers were shortened considerably and called "pilots," as posted above.

 

Here is a Lionel "O" Gauge GENERAL set with a cowcatcher.

GENERALSet

 

Here is No. 17, the YORK, with a cowcatcher modified for a knuckle coupler. This could represent a "missing link" between a cowcatcher and a pilot. This beauty runs on the historic Northern Central Railway between New Freedom and Hanover Junction south of York, PA, under the auspices of Steam into History

BrightShinyYORK17 003

 

Here is a Lionel Reading T-1 with a stubby pilot and footboards. The thrifty Reading made pilots from old boiler tubes.

WowakT-1 001

Attachments

Images (3)
  • GENERALSet
  • BrightShinyYORK17 003
  • WowakT-1 001
Last edited by ReadingFan
Originally Posted by JohnGaltLine:

Seems that raising the ... SteakMaker™... is the best option here.  As for what gives me trouble, the Polar Express Berk.Jr. likes to give me fits with the long 'nose'.  

The Caribou Catcher?  (That would have certainly put a different feel to that part of the movie! )

 

-Dave

 

Last edited by Dave45681
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

I'm sorry if my terminology caused some people to have a beef with me.  However, I will not cow before all the pressure.  I think the whole matter is a lot of bull, but I promise to steer away from such controversial topics in the future lest you brand me a bad little dogie.

 

 

 

It's all Greek to me.

Last edited by Lima
Originally Posted by Lima:
Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

I'm sorry if my terminology caused some people to have a beef with me.  However, I will not cow before all the pressure.  I think the whole matter is a lot of bull, but I promise to steer away from such controversial topics in the future lest you brand me a bad little dogie.

 

 

 

It's all Greek to me.

Sit back, relax...  Have a gyros...

 

Rusty

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×