Has anyone ever had "cowcatcher clearance" issues with locos they make or buy that have prototypical clearances in front? I had never given it any thought until I had problems withwith one I am building this morning
I'm doing a serious bash project on a LC+ Hudson, transforming it into a much larger, and very scale version of a 2-6-4 steamer of a type I think will be particularly handsome. More details can be found on my thread about the project on the new LC+ forum here,
https://ogrforum.com/t...ons-for-my-next-bash
I ran the loco some this morning in a lengthy test. It is complete if not yet cosmetically finished. I was shocked when I got sparks - the cowcatcher was so low that when the loco went over places where the track begins an incline up, or at the bottom of a climb as the track levels off, the front of the cowcatcher would hit the center rail and for a brief time there was a short circuit.
Here is the photo of ATSF 3751 I used for guidance in size and such (along with my Legacy version sitting next to me) while making the new body and all for my LC+ bash. Note the small prototypical clearance in front . . . I patterned the one I made for my bashed loco on this cowcatcher and its clearance. By the way: I swear that looks like Wilford Brimley. I never thought of him as a "railroad person," but now that I think of it . . .
Here was my bashed loco prior to its first test run this morning, with its original, near-prototype clearance.
After seeing the sparks, I checked the clearance of my other, "store bought" locos and noticed all are a bit higher than what you see in photos of real locos. Here is my Vision Hudson. The Legacy 3751 is the same.
Here it is after modification to match the clearance of the two Lionel locos. It runs fine now.