Audi,
Too bad it is not of a more robust design so it would work well for everyone.
It might be a good idea to get a bit more experience with DCS before you start criticizing it from a lack of knowledge. DCS is far more robust and tolerant of different wiring schemes than its critics would have you believe.
All false modesty aside, my experience would indicate that the vast majority of DCS issues are due to operator error, generally from ignoring any shred of documentation that either accompanies the product or is available elsewhere.
The other reasons for DCS problems are:
- Wiring anomalies and track topology issues, and using components from other manufacturers that are incompatible with DCS
- Interference with the DCS signal from some (but not all) TMCC and Legacy locos, some passenger cars (early Golden Gate Depot and some others), Atlas cabooses, and some others. These issues are easily corrected
- DCS component issues, i.e., defective or malfunctioning hardware
- Bugs in the DCS software, of which there are about a half dozen, some of which are quite obscure.
Consider this: to my knowledge, which is somewhat extensive although of course not complete, there has only been one instance of a DCS "problem" that was not eventually resolved, and this was because the operator was unwilling to implement the solution.
If you want to better understand DCS and maximize your DCS experience, I suggest that you purchase a copy of The DCS O Gauge Companion 2nd Edition. It will cost you less than the MSRP of a Rail King freight car.
Everything you need or want to know about DCS is in MTH’s “The DCS O Gauge Companion 2nd Edition", available for purchase as an eBook or a printed book at MTH's web store!