Skip to main content

I didn't like the look. It's that simple.  

  • The operation was technically a success, that patient lived through the surgery, it all went according to plan, etc.
  • But the loco didn't have the powerful-in-a-small-package look I wanted.  Somehow the esthetics were slightly off: the three-axle truck didn't quite work given the very long rear section s and short driver wheelbase, etc., or something.  But whatever: it just didn't look right to me. 
  • I'd painted it satin black, but it turned out far too glossy.
  • I didn't like the white stripes.  Yes, the B&A 4-6-6 tank has them, and I;m not sure I like them on it, either.  
  • It would not pull well - only six cars max.  This is something I discovered only last night.  I had cut the original metal tender in half and grafted its rear half to the loco.  It was a HEAVY tender, and thatlong half sticking out the back moved the loco's center of gravity to right over the rearmost set of drivers.  Any substantial load pulling on it tended to rock the loco back enough so that the front two sets of drivers lost almost all their traction.  It was wheelspin all the time with more than six cars.

So, it went back to the operating table where I removed the rear section (everything behind the cab) and built a new shorter but taller rear section, just big enough to house, with a bit of squeezing, the speaker.  It is very lightweight plastic.  The center of gravity is now where it should be, right over the center set of drivers.   

  • And I painted it flat black when done.  
  • I mimicked the shape of the B&A coal load area.  That, the shorter rear section, which allows the rear truck to be moved about 1/2 inch forward and yet that truck still looks long enough now, all seem to make the esthetics work for me .  I love its look. It's just very handsome, very complete in its appearance now.   And it pulls up to 15 scale reefers - probably more but that was all I had set up for a test. 

As was my goal all along, still it fits in around scale locos, and particularly it "mixes well" with Lionel's scale Atlantic, Legacy 0-8-0s and small Pacifics like the Southern Crescent.  It looks like it belongs, and is as handsome as any of them.

 

I liked this project so much I ordered another LC+ Hudson so I can do another project.  I plan to spend an hour or two tonight looking through E. d. Worley's Iron Horses of the Santa Fe Trail to find something I can make the Hudson into a scale model of.  But it will be fun, whatever it is . . . 

 

Slide1

Slide2

DSCN1996

Attachments

Images (3)
  • Slide1
  • Slide2
  • DSCN1996
Videos (1)
DSCN1998
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Lee, I'm not gonna pull any punches. I really liked it before, especially the white stripes. I thought it gave it an early NYC Hudson look, and some nice commuter cars would have been sweet.

Now... I LOVE it! Miss the striping, but feels like a modernized loco compared to the striped.

I do miss the stripes. Soooo, when can you do mine?  Ha��!

Thanks,
Mario

Thanks everyone.  

 

I got an e-mail asking if the tender really weights enough to make as much difference as I said (when just half is grafted to the back of the loco.  

 

The tender shell for the LC+ Hudson weight just under 27 ounces, and the portion I grafted onto this tank engine in the first go-around weighed 12.

 

Here is the other 15 ounces of that tender with the nice, still-siny cut showing.  You can see how thick the metal is.  A heavy tender makes for a loco that can pull a heavy train without any trace of stringlining, of course, so I am sure that is why they do it.  

DSCN2006

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSCN2006

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
CONTACT US
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×