Skip to main content

This isn't quite what the title might suggest.  I think it will interest a few people a lot and others not at all.  I posted it here rather than in the electrical section because I think some of those interested won't be into electricity, just interested in the concept.  

 

I welcome all comments, including that I perhaps spend too much time on things like this . . . 

 

Anyway, I did a little thinking about the total amount of power my trains use, including losses in the transformers, etc., when I am am running them.  This has become a big topic of conversation in our household.  It started when my wife suggested that "your trains probably use more electricity than our car" (we have an electric car).  I do spend more time with the trains than driving the car but the short answer is "not even close."  Still, I was surprised by how much they use when I computed the estimate below.  

 

This table shows what I think the trains I ran this afternoon consumed.  It is my best estimate, 400 watts total for 267 watts measured reaching the trains, and is about typical for what I run on the average day.

 

Train Power Estimate

This shows the various power sources to my loops and superstreets track on the left, and the trains I ran with each supply.  The three columns to the right are, respectively, the power the power supply itself consumes (what would be called no-load losses in power engineering), the power that actually reaches the model train, and the estimated power supply losses that power creates in the power supply when the train is running (what would be called load-related losses).  The total comes to 400 watts, which is is an estimate based on: measuring the power used by each running train and SS car fairly accurately, measuring the total power leaving the plug in the wall to the train layout with them all running and with them all shut down, and trying to explain the differences.

 

My measurements: I can measure fairly accurately the DC power going to each train: measurements in the middle column are within +/- 10% or less.  I have only one instrument that will measure AC current.  I inherited it from my father.  I think it is a 1960's Heathkit although it has no label.  It also measures DC current and when doing so fairly well matches modern instruments, but who knows if it is accurate with AC?. Anyway I got 119 volts under load at the outlet when running the trains, and 3 1/3 to 3 1/2 amps when all the trains where running, about 2.3 amp when all were shut down, and a hard-to-read .25+ amps with just the Z4000 running: that seems reasonable though, for no load losses for a 400 watt transformer, the fan, the digital display and electronics, and lights, etc.  

- - - I also did the following, set everything running as above and started turning on devices plugged into the same circuit until the 15 amp breaker tripped.  A 1500 watt electric heater alone does the trick, but the when set to low (about 1250 watts) it does not, even with along with a map of three 40 watt bulbs plugged in, too.

 

Anyway, if accurate, this means that only about 2/3 of the power leaving the plug is getting the the trains.  That's actually a higher percentage than I expected - I thought it would be less than half.

 

But to answer my wife: I also have six 23 watt compact florescent lights illuminating the train room, and 6x23= 138 watts more (on another circuit, but still electricity the trains "use" in the bigger sense).  So that makes 538 watts.  I run about an our a day and maybe three hours a day on weekends, for 11 hours a week, times 4.33 weeks/month, equals 26 kWhr per month.

 

And yeah, I know I forgot AC power factor completely, but I just decided to do a simple volts x amps here. 

 

Meanwhile our Chevy Volt has a lifetime plug-to-pavement average of almost exactly 3.0 miles/kWhr.  I drive about 800 miles a month so that is 266 kWhr per month, or almost exactly ten times more power than my estimate for the trains.  Actually, I'm surprised the trains use anywhere near 1/10th as much as the car does.  

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Train Power Estimate
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Flash - your results are pretty close to mine, percentage wise, then - about 2/3 to the trains and 1/3 lost.  

 

KevinE - I'm not concerned about the cost at all.  At ten cents per kilowatt hour my fun costs all of $2.65/month.  A tube of glue for scratch-building costs more.  But it is interesting, how much power the trains consume. 

 

Another interesting thing I determined today when measuring: lighted caboose with incandescent lights = about 6 watts.  With LED, about 1 watt.  

Originally Posted by Lee Willis:

 

KevinE - I'm not concerned about the cost at all.  At ten cents per kilowatt hour my fun costs all of $2.65/month.  A tube of glue for scratch-building costs more.  But it is interesting, how much power the trains consume. 

 

 

I meant to add one of these , at the end of my post!

Originally Posted by scale rail:

Lee, thanks for the info. I'm very interested because here in Maui we pay $100 every six days to run our house. Don

At least you don't need much heating. I suppose the power stations are diesel powered? They should have steam turbines powered by the volcano heat underground. My quarterly bill is about $250. Winter, it might get to $400 for that quarter.

I dread to think what folk in the cold parts of the US pay.

I'd add a bit more to your calculation. Most likely that 1/3 loss is dissipated as heat. I've noticed in my trainroom, with all lights on and running, the room temp increases quickly requiring Air Conditioning even in cooler months. More people more A/C required.  I have a lot of incandescent display lighting.  I would guess basic area condition to be at least what you plugged in for lighting, maybe less if we are talking heat only, the gained heat from the inefficiency would lessen the heat load. Cooling and dehumidification would be more.   

Originally Posted by Dave Allen:
Originally Posted by scale rail:

Lee, thanks for the info. I'm very interested because here in Maui we pay $100 every six days to run our house. Don

At least you don't need much heating. I suppose the power stations are diesel powered? They should have steam turbines powered by the volcano heat underground. My quarterly bill is about $250. Winter, it might get to $400 for that quarter.

I dread to think what folk in the cold parts of the US pay.

Depends on type of fuel used and efficiency of the home.  Choices are diesel fuel/heating oil, natural gas, or electric. There are wood and coal burners.

My home (1,800 sq ft) built in the mid 1970's has an electric heat pump installed 12 years ago. (Newer equipment is/or can be more efficient).

Average monthly usage for the past 12 months 1609 kwh, 19,308 kwh Total @.1260/kwh.(Including Gross receipt tax, PA State Tax)  $2,432 per year $202.73/month.   Very mild winter.  Natural gas at the moment is the cheapest energy source, oil very expensive. 

 

Thanks all.  This is turning out to be quite interesting.   We pay a pretty typical rate for power (10.3 cents) but have a low electric bill because even with an electric car we're pretty efficiency and low usage.  I'm rather proud of the energy usage of our house.  It was built as 3147 cooled/heated sq. feet with two AC units (one up, one down), dble pane windows, etc.: typical high efficiency 1990-era house.  Heat is high eff gas.  

    In '95 I finished the attic, building what was then a 400+ sq. ft., studio apartment for my son up there.  It is now my train room and workshop.  I built it with R64 insulation to its walls and ceiling and added a foot of pink stuff over all the attic floor not covered by the apartment.  All that insulation and sealing reduced the heat losses of the house enough that I could almost get away with no net increase in cooling units: I re-routing some cool air from the upstairs unit to the attic apartment and had to add only a very small window unit to assist in very hot times.  

   Since then I have replaced the AC with max efficiency (SEER 14) units and gone past compact fluorescent lighting where we can to LED, etc.  We average about 800 kWhr a month, varying between about 1300 in summer to 500 in winter, at avg 10.3 cents for a typical bill of about $85.  Gas heat for air and water runs about the same avg yearround.  Electrically a typical month breaks down like this:

 

- Car (800 miles electric)-- 250

- AC+fans-------------------- 210

- Lighting--------------------  175

- Cooking---------------------- 60

- Model trains----------------- 25

- Entertainment (TVs)          25

- Other------------------------- 40

-------------------------Total  800

 

My model trains are not a major usage, but it is interesting that they use enough to show up on this list at all.  Our house is efficient, but the low usage is mostly lifestyle: we're two older folks who live pretty quietly.  My youngest son has a 1600 sq. ft. house about five miles from us, roughly as efficiently insulated and fitted out, and pays about $110/month - there are only the two of them but they live a lot "louder" than we do. :-)

Originally Posted by scale rail:
Mike, there is no heating system in our house. Don

Gee, I sure hope not!  My 18 years living in Hawaii did see a few unseasonably cool days, but nothing that would have required a heating system.  When it comes to overall climatic conditions, the Islands have to be about the best you can find anywhere.  And all that saved energy should just mean that you can build an even larger layout and run even more trains.  

Lee,

 

So for about 1 kWhr/day (26 kWhr/month), you run your trains.

 

To put this in perspective, how does it compare to what household appliances (LCD TV, refrigerator, stove, microwave, desktop computer etc) use per day?  I had to reach behind my 19" flat screen monitor yesterday and noticed there's quite a bit of heat generated from it.  It probably cost me more to type this than it does to run my trains for 1 hour LOL!

 

What type of trains are you running, passenger or freight?  How many lighted buildings do you have on your layout (bulbs or LEDs)?

 

I suspect folks with a postwar type layout have a higher usage than those with modern, can-motored engines and buildings with LEDs.

"Well Lee, you can be proud of yourself, very responsible power use,"

 

Well,  I'm a power engineer who consults to utilities on energy efficiency and EV impacts on power distribution systems. The engineer in my measures and tracks things - its just what I do (e.g,. the table that started this thread.)   As to the energy efficiency, I'm simply following my own advice.

--> Strictly speaking, as much insulation as I added, and the EV, don't cost-justify themselves at my current prices for electricity.  The insulation only breaks even on cash cost at 10 years - too long a payback to interest most folks.  And the EV is worse: it consumes $28 a month of electricity to avoid using about $155 of gasoline: it will repay the extra $20K it cost in 13 years: considerably longer than I am likely to own it. 

--> However, there are benefits beyond savings to both.  First, our home is much more uniformly cool in summer and warm in winter with all that insulation and heat mirror film on its windows.  And until you experience it you can't appreciate how convenient, and just pleasant, it is to never have to stop at a gas station to fill up your car.

Originally Posted by Bob Delbridge:

Lee,

 

So for about 1 kWhr/day (26 kWhr/month), you run your trains.

 

To put this in perspective, how does it compare to what household appliances (LCD TV, refrigerator, stove, microwave, desktop computer etc) use per day?  I had to reach behind my 19" flat screen monitor yesterday and noticed there's quite a bit of heat generated from it.  It probably cost me more to type this than it does to run my trains for 1 hour LOL!

 

What type of trains are you running, passenger or freight?  How many lighted buildings do you have on your layout (bulbs or LEDs)?

 

I suspect folks with a postwar type layout have a higher usage than those with modern, can-motored engines and buildings with LEDs.

Well, I have all solid state ( TV's and monitors only (more efficient) that power down when not in use, and as i said a couple of posts above, they net about what the trains do each month - around 25 kWhr per month for Tv's radios, computers.

 

As to trains, I posted just what I was running the other afternoon in the table at the beginning of this thread, and while I vary a bit, I am always running:

- two scale Legacy or Vision or PS2 or 3 steamers, one each on my two big loops, powered by the Z4000,

-one to four BEEPS or BEEFS on my Beepworld loop (CW-80)

- a Williams ten-wheeler or something similar on my mountain/mining loop (CW-80), 

- two or three SS cars, and two city buses, on my Superstreets (two old DC HO supplies).

Usually one of those trains has lighted passenger cars, so the total is right around the 276 net watts listed, or if no passenger consist, about 175, or if two passenger trains (rare, but on occasion, about 350. 

   I suppose I could use up to nearly 450 net, about 650 - 700 watts with losses in an extreme case; I have a postwar A-B-A all powered set of SF warbonnet F3s that each consume 30-40 watts with their old Pullmor motors, and if I run all three at once them alone consume 110+ watts versus maybe 40 for a modern set . . .

There is a lot to be learned just reviewing utility bills and doing comparisons. Two of Lee's major energy consuming items, Heat and Hot water are not included in his electric summary, because they are natural gas. Currently at a 30 year low here in the U.S. do to all the recent shale gas developement. 

- Car (800 miles electric)-- 250 

This energy use is not normally consider part of the home.

- AC+fans-------------------- 210

- Lighting--------------------  175

- Cooking---------------------- 60

- Model trains----------------- 25

- Entertainment (TVs)          25

- Other------------------------- 40

-------------------------Total  800

Heat natural gas

Hot water  natural gas

So total energy consumption is a bit more though extreme well done for that size home.

 

 

Comparison usage listed on my electric bill

Month---------------- April 2011------April 2012

Average khr per day-------86-------------42

Average Temp (deg. F)----42-------------54

YTD Usage khr----------11,676---------8904

Car use (Prius) (April) (2) fill-ups  18.09 gal @ $3.959  $71.71 

 @ 45mpg  814 miles.  

Probably my biggest train related energy expense is the luxury of heating the 576 sq ft garage as my work shop, done with electric resistance space heaters.   

 

         

Last edited by Mike CT
Originally Posted by F-V Trains:

Very interesting, Lee. I was wondering about that. Did you happen to measure any operating accessories (if you have any)?

 

BTW, where are you in NC? Email if you like (see profile); I'm near Fuquay-Varina when in NC.

 

Bruce

 

Tried to find your e-mail, F-V, but they don't seem to be listed in the profiles any more - I could not find it, anyway.  e-mail me at Lwillis@quanta-technology.com if you want.

 

I live in SW Cary about 20 minutes from F-V. 

Here we're on American Electric Power or AEP as we call them 7.00 Cents a Kilowatt hour( I just happened to have retired from AEP)
Most of AEP's generation is coal fired with some hydro used as boosters.
There are some  wind farms in the works but unless you have a heck of alot of them they're as yet not very efficient . I've been watching another new technology evolve.
Solar power. They've made some great strides in panel design and output in the last couple years and in the not to distant future could be efficient enough to put the power companys as we know them out of the residential business.
These panels can also be a source for hot water and with pipes circulating through the ground coolant lines for A/C and heating systems.
This new technology is evolving so fast that the kids here at the local college in electrical engineering curriculum have a half semester class in solar power.

If you really want to save on your electric bill

The biggest culprit is your hot water heater it's a silent thief.
If you have it set to high or one element is bad it'll rob you blind with nothing to show for it.
Next is the outside portion of your heat pump. Is it more than 10 years old? 15 maybe?
Well it'll save you money if you replace it with a new one with a scroll compressor.
They're efficient enough to make the expense worth it.
Then you get into the small but maybe not so small stuff. Replace any bulb you can with the new CFL or LED bulbs
Reduce your fridge AND freezer setting by a notch.
Keep room doors shut and turn off lights when you leave.
This probably has special meaning for Don( and most of the rest of us)
Turn ceiling fans off when you leave the room. They're really quiet these days and easy to forget.No sense running it if your not there to enjoy it.
All these little things cost you money. Taking care of all these things can easily save you several hundred dollars a year. Now what could you buy with that?

David

if all you have time to do is worry about how much the electricity cost to run your trains, then you should sell or give them away! Trains are supposed to be a fun, albeit expensive,  hobby. Worrying about the cost to run them sorta takes the fun out of the equation. While running the trains and worrying about how many little watts you killin' sounds like a chore which by its other name is work!

Hang on a sec...

 

It's an academic exercise, not rain on a parade. I was interested in this as a mental exercise rather than a reason whether or not to run trains...

 

I'm not sure anybody needs to read more into this than "Mmmm..., that's interesting" and fill up the smoke unit for another 30 min of joy!

 

As always, I learn a lot from you guys who are doing the electrical engineering...

 

Bruce

Originally Posted by killian:
If you are concerned about your ELECTRIC BILL, think of TWO WORDS, SOLAR POWER.  Just my 2 cents.

 

 

No offense, but that's pure bunk.   With today's technology, it's simply not cost effective to generate any significant part of your electric energy with solar power.   In many parts of the country, solar simply doesn't make sense.  The ROI on a solar installation in SE-PA would be basically forever!

Originally Posted by killian:

We have a two story building that is almost the size of a football field here at the Veterans Home that is SOLAR POWER.  In this building we have a library that is open 11 hours a day, 7 days a week.  We have a game room that is also open 12/7 plus the PX that is open 8 am to 3:30 am 5 days a week plus many more offices and other rooms in this building.  I'm not an expert on SOLAR POWER or electricity and I'm not telling anyone to buy solar panels, I'm just saying, you may want to think about it.  To each his own.  If you have a better idea, then share it with the forum members who may have concerns about their electric bills.

Only the government can afford to spend the kind of money it costs to do that.  Like I said, it's simply not cost effective for someone that actually has to pay the bills to do such a thing.  It's not even close.  You're not looking at the ROI on that solar installation, if you were you'd be stunned!

 

My last post on solar power, we've already dragged this far enough off-topic.

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:
Originally Posted by killian:

We have a two story building that is almost the size of a football field here at the Veterans Home that is SOLAR POWER.  In this building we have a library that is open 11 hours a day, 7 days a week.  We have a game room that is also open 12/7 plus the PX that is open 8 am to 3:30 am 5 days a week plus many more offices and other rooms in this building.  I'm not an expert on SOLAR POWER or electricity and I'm not telling anyone to buy solar panels, I'm just saying, you may want to think about it.  To each his own.  If you have a better idea, then share it with the forum members who may have concerns about their electric bills.

Only the government can afford to spend the kind of money it costs to do that.  Like I said, it's simply not cost effective for someone that actually has to pay the bills to do such a thing.  It's not even close.  You're not looking at the ROI on that solar installation, if you were you'd be stunned!

 

My last post on solar power, we've already dragged this far enough off-topic.

I'll say it again for all you that missed it. If you read about the advances in just the last 2 years That ROI your speaking of just got way more attractive.

Solar power. They've made some great strides in panel design and output in the last couple years and in the not to distant future could be efficient enough to put the power companys as we know them out of the residential business.
These panels can also be a source for hot water and with pipes circulating through the ground coolant lines for A/C and heating systems.
This new technology is evolving so fast that the kids here at the local college in electrical engineering curriculum have a half semester class in solar power because this will be the new norm.

Those solar arrays coupled with super conductors will allow whole towns to be independent of the power companys. The output of these new panels is far more than it used to be meaning they're more efficient which will require less panels making them more cost effective.
My friend teaches the course at the college and I've looked thru the books for the course and we have discussed it at length . The contractors that take the time to get certified in the installation of these new panels will be very glad they did.
Hey yall started this about the use of electricity . I'm just telling you whats coming down the pike.

David

I've setup my backyard garage so I can run my trains on solar power.

 

1 15watt solar panel $35

1 12 volt deep cycle marine battery $60

1 400watt modified sine-wave inverter $35

 

That smug feeling I get every time Al Gore comes over to run my trains using the cleanest energy possible...

 

...priceless

 

 

Of course I'm kidding. I would never let Al Gore touch my trains

 

Seriously though, its a start.

The only problem with the setup is the cheap 400w inverter. It wont power my overhead florescent tube lights because of the modified sine wave.

I'm gonna have to buy a much better and more expensive "pure" sine-wave inverter.

 

I have been doing small scale experimenting with solar power for about 8 years now.

I have calculated the break even point of solar power, assuming I did all the labor myself, to be about 10 years.

 

 

 

A little Retro.   About a month ago I was helping my  youngest daughter move her friend to a very nice 70ish house in Boardman OH.   I explained to the young couple that the house was 70ish and pointed out a few things that they were not aware of.  He mentioned an interesting box the size of an electric panel that even his house inspector was puzzle by.  The house, when built, had electric heat cables plastered in the ceiling, still functioning, with a thermostat in every room.  The unknown box in the basement was a power management system, most likely supplied by the power company.  Electrical billing was based, not only on kwh (kilowatt hrs), actual energy used, but  also Maximum demand Kilowatts.   This type of billing is very common for medium, and heavy commercial users.

The Power company supply system has to be designed for maximum, transmission and gereration.  If the power company can temper the peaks, its to there advantage.  So this control system, with dialed-in, selective, maximum Kilowatt setting,  would  cycle room heat circuits as required to meet the setting.  A lower Kilowatt measurement for the month meant a lower electric bill.

 

More common were seperate demand meters for electric hot water tanks that turned the tanks off from 10AM to 12Noon and 5 PM to 10PM, peak electric demand time.  

 

Kind of like parking one train to run another.  If you want to run two at the same time it's going to cost you more. Not just twice for the amount of energy used, but a sur-charge for our generation system having to be larger.

 

  

Last edited by Mike CT
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×