Skip to main content

Second mini project this weekend was lowering Atlas truck assemblies in order to achieve a more prototypical ride height on the 25.5k tanks:

IMG_1349

 

It took a bit of reverse engineering, but I'm happy with the result.  Much more of a realistic, low-slung look as opposed to the stock bolsters on the right-hand car below.  The Kadee couplers are now spot-on the height gauge as well.

IMG_1351

 

Jack

 

 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_1349
  • IMG_1351
Last edited by GE Hogger
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hi guys,

I'll never be mistaken for a good machinist, but I found something that worked.

First I trimmed/filed both sides of the upper plate so that it rests down between the two sideframe assemblies, rather than on top:

IMG_1353

IMG_1354

Then I milled down the center collar using a milling bit in a drill press.  Here's a side by side comparisan

IMG_1352

I need to paint, weather and add some more detail, especially to the underside of the trucks, since they are so visible on the tank cars.  I typically leave the two sideframe screws out, which lets the trucks equalize over the uneven track on my branchline layout.

IMG_1355

 

Jack

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_1352
  • IMG_1354
  • IMG_1355
  • IMG_1353

 I was really never that picky about certain things, mainly from lack of knowledge. As I learn stuff, I want it right. I don't know if it's an getting older thing???

I don't blast the manufacturers much as I feel they have too many sides to try and please. I'm glad when I can simply get my hands on a piece of a equipment that I'm searching for. I have been taught that tweaking is a fact of life from even the best pieces delivered.

 When I was a young child, I was driven up to my dad at work and watched him around the tank cars. I never even looked much at engines other than to see when they started moving. I don't even know what paint schemes were on the engines. I thought they were all the same. I still don't look as close at anything else than tank cars. There were a lot of duds over the years. these are great looking to me.

Anyways...... Great work!

First of all, hats off to you for a great result!  I applaud your efforts and skills that really improved the look of this fabulous model!

But I am really disappointed that Atlas tooled these such that they are hard to lower without significant, irreversible work like you did.  If Atlas made these, and the 17,300 corn syrup cars (also a fabulous looking model), to the correct ride height), I would have a whole string of Atlas tank cars.

I have some of these cars and with the stock Atlas coupler box they are right at the height to match my Kaydee equiped cars although I believe if you use the Kaydee coupler box it will probably need either a shim for the box or triming the truck bolster as GEHogger has done. I have found if you replace the Atlas knuckle and centering springs with the lighter Kaydee springs you can have reliable operation using the existing Atlas coupler setup 25,500 Tank coupler ht 002 JMO

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 25,500 Tank coupler ht 002
SANTIAGOP23 posted:

 

 DSC02717

 

Once again, these are great models and I love all the details.  (BTW, great photography work there, Santiago).

But the above photo illustrates my point.  I know from rail fanning and looking at photos that with tank cars, the bottom of the cylinder should be lined up with the wheel flanges.  Even changing these trucks out to Weaver/Athearn trucks still won't lower these to that height.  Even the irreversible surgery that Jack did doesn't achieve that.

I went through this lowering the 2r Atlas auto carriers, and still didn't get prototypical height despite all my work. 

Hopefully the new Maxi-IV cars will be simple to get prototypical ride height.

Hi Andre - good question.  Once the springs are reinstalled, they actually hold the sideframes to the bolster very well, independent of whether the caps are on the axles or not.  

The bolster plate has to twist in order to disengage from the sideframe.  It seems the springs keep it from doing that.

Once remounted to the car, I was worried about the sideframes canting at an angle if the screws were left out, but I've found (happily!) that they do not do so.  The tabs on the sideframes remain flat on the bolster plate keeping the sideframes nice and vertical.

Best,

Jack

Unfortunately, I've found in my experience that the sideframes DO cant in at an agle if that cross plate is removed - the springs are so strong they force the sideframes inwards. Also, with rotating bearing cap trucks where the axle passes through the sideframe, this can bind the axles, as does the equalising action on uneven track, to such an extent that the wheels can stop turning.

I just gave up with this idea and replaced the cross bar on all my Atlas trucks. They might not equalise any more, but at least they're free-rolling again. That's my experience, anyway.

Sunday Shunter:

I had a couple of "misbehaving" Atlas 4750 hoppers that seemed to randomly derail (slighly uneven track, maybe), and it was definitely random as they never derailed in the same place twice. I removed the top plate from the trucks, but put the retaining screws back in on the sides. That kept the alignment of the side frames, but allowed them to equalize slightly which seemed to solve the problem.

Jack:

I really like your modification to the Atlas trucks. As much as I like Atlas cars, they do sit too high.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×