Skip to main content

I'm using RR Track software to develop some yards on my layout.  If I use a Ross 4-way switch and put 1/2 072 curve on the outside rails, my two outside rails seem to be only about 2.5 inches on centerline to the inside rails.  I think this is too tight but thought I would ask for opinions here before proceeding.  What would be the minimum center line that can be used?  The two middle tracks coming out of the 4 way appear to be 3.5 inches.

LionelFlyer

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

You need to add a short straight section between the switch and the O-72 curve to get 3.5” C-C.  I use 3.5” in my classification yard and it is tight if you need to add cars.  I use Ross Regular swiches, not quite No 5 (O-100), and they work great with all my steamers. Some bigger steamers, and my Centipedes, do not like backing through my Ross double-slip switches which are No 4.

When you surgically shorten a #6 you can tighten up the throat.  Have you approached Ross about ladder track?

Alan nailed the primary reason so you will not have any limitations.  Additionally #6 just looks better.  A #4 sort kinda looks a bit too traction for me.

For long parallel alignment I use two tools for staging and other yards.  Shorn SS sheet metal and tempered Masonite.  Most any sheet metal shop will shear off a  band of metal for you.  Or you can rip some Masonite.

Alan's gauges are really neat, they could be handy for curved yards.

Something that will help you lay out steady curves would be to pre-bend all your curved flex track.  That is one way to avoid having angular or peaked rail end joints.  Depending on the type of rail bender you use there is always a degree of necessary cut off scrap to acquire even curves.

All track centerlines are drawn on the deck using tangent straight edges and transition templates.  All curved track is pre bent using a rail bender then one rail is advanced for staggered splicing.  On two rail track as shone, I stagger rail ends about 6" to 8".   Hard fixed rail like Micro Eng or GG all ends are trimmed back to exact curvature.    I use dozens of square spacers with a nail tacked in the center.  I will lay out one exact track then using a series of spacers I will add additional adjoining like here:

8.17 014I use the squares for  the curve and strips of metal for the tangent track.   The above staging loop is 13' X 29'.  It can hold up to 18 medium trains.

If you look closely you will notice all curves have a  spiral easement.  I use a range of easement templates:

IMG_6919

I also use Masonite gauge strips which are 1 1/4 wide and pre-drilled for the factory nail holes.  I drop them between the rails to hasten fastening the track down.  Your curve can not be too consistent and your tangent track cannot be  too straight.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 8.17 014
  • IMG_6919
Last edited by Tom Tee

Essentially, yes.  I blend Armstrong and NMRA S-8 standards on multi track right a ways.  IF you follow their simple steps there will always be safe clearance margins. 

There are four math formulas for laying out a spiral easement but setting an easement of 1/2 your fixed radius centered at the theoretical start of your curve offset by a set X factor will be just fine for a model railroad.  The important thing is to make sure you bent stick is exactly sitting on 1/2 of your offset and your stick conforms to the right of way at both ends.

Using templates you merely set your desired clearance on the fixed arcs and all else finds it's place.

Last edited by Tom Tee

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×