Skip to main content

On April 16th & 17th initial work was performed on Norfolk & Western #611 at the Virginia Museum of Transportation in preparation for her journey to Spencer, NC where she will be restored to operating condition. The major restoration work will be done at the North Carolina Transportation Museum and is expected to last approximately 9 months.

It is expected that Roanoke's Rockstar, N&W #611, will again be operational sometime during the 2nd Quarter of 2015, an event which has not happened in nearly 20 years!

Below is a link to an approximate 8 minute video of the preparation activities conducted on the 16th & 17th at the Virginia Museum of Transportation.

This is not by any means the highest video quality possible as time did not permit same. However, I dare say that by the time you finish viewing this piece that it just may make you as a grown man, and/or woman cry !!!

>

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Also, I wonder why they are removing the main rod/rods?

HW are you trying to bait us????  

 

I have already posted about the Trains Special Mag Extra 2014 on the Big Boys and 4014 in particular.  Interesting to note they did NOT remove the mains to move 4014.  But they did remove the piston rods.  HW how easy is that to do?

 

Oh HW in this pub Jim Wrinn states the exposed coolers were gone "by 1951."  Based on pics and DVD I have guessed 52/53, but by 51.

 

Ron

Last edited by PRRronbh
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Also, I wonder why they are removing the main rod/rods?

HW are you trying to bait us????

 

 

No, just wondering, since removing the main rods puts the main drive out of balance. 

 

I have already posted about the Trains Special Mag Extra 2014 on the Big Boys and 4014 in particular.  Interesting to note they did NOT remove the mains to move 4014.

 

Correct, because THAT puts the main driver out of balance.

 

 But they did remove the piston rods.

 

Yes, because you don't want the pistons "pumping air" while being towed, plus without steam flow through the valves and cylinders there is no really effective method of lubricating everything inside.

 

 

 HW how easy is that to do?

 

Not all that difficult, if you have the manpower and a fork lift.

 

 

Oh HW in this pub Jim Wrinn states the exposed coolers were gone "by 1951."  Based on pics and DVD I have guessed 52/53, but by 51.

 

Yes, by 1951, which I have stated previously, but others seem to argue that fact.

 

Ron

 

Good video, thanks for posting. Picked the right song to play too.

 

Can't wait for a ride.

 

What an exciting time us Steam locomotive fans are living in! On the Right coast BIG steam has really been dead for decades. Then 765 comes to the Curve in 2013, and now 611 is being reawakened.

 

Just a few years ago, who would have thunk it?

 

B&O Pacific should be next!

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Also, I wonder why they are removing the main rod/rods?

HW are you trying to bait us????

 

 

No, just wondering, since removing the main rods puts the main drive out of balance. 

 

I have already posted about the Trains Special Mag Extra 2014 on the Big Boys and 4014 in particular.  Interesting to note they did NOT remove the mains to move 4014.

 

Correct, because THAT puts the main driver out of balance.

 

 But they did remove the piston rods.

 

Yes, because you don't want the pistons "pumping air" while being towed, plus without steam flow through the valves and cylinders there is no really effective method of lubricating everything inside.

 

 

 HW how easy is that to do?

 

Not all that difficult, if you have the manpower and a fork lift.

 

 

Oh HW in this pub Jim Wrinn states the exposed coolers were gone "by 1951."  Based on pics and DVD I have guessed 52/53, but by 51.

 

Yes, by 1951, which I have stated previously, but others seem to argue that fact.

 

Ron

 

HW I thought you were referring to the rod from crosshead slide to driver (have not looked at video) not main connecting rods.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Also, I wonder why they are removing the main rod/rods?

HW are you trying to bait us????

 

 

No, just wondering, since removing the main rods puts the main drive out of balance. 

 

I have already posted about the Trains Special Mag Extra 2014 on the Big Boys and 4014 in particular.  Interesting to note they did NOT remove the mains to move 4014.

 

Correct, because THAT puts the main driver out of balance.

 

 But they did remove the piston rods.

 

Yes, because you don't want the pistons "pumping air" while being towed, plus without steam flow through the valves and cylinders there is no really effective method of lubricating everything inside.

 

 

 HW how easy is that to do?

 

Not all that difficult, if you have the manpower and a fork lift.

 

 

Oh HW in this pub Jim Wrinn states the exposed coolers were gone "by 1951."  Based on pics and DVD I have guessed 52/53, but by 51.

 

Yes, by 1951, which I have stated previously, but others seem to argue that fact.

 

Ron

 

HW I thought you were referring to the rod from crosshead slide to driver (have not looked at video) not main connecting rods.

 

Ron

That IS "the main rod"! Maybe you SHOULD view the video????

Yes, because you don't want the pistons "pumping air" while being towed, plus without steam flow through the valves and cylinders there is no really effective method of lubricating everything inside.

 

 

When the Santa Fe moved its museum collection to Sacramento the 5021 was towed with the main rods and piston rods in place.  The heat created by the pumping action kept causing hot box detectors to go off and thus dropping the signals to red.

 

Stuart

 

Originally Posted by Stuart:

Yes, because you don't want the pistons "pumping air" while being towed, plus without steam flow through the valves and cylinders there is no really effective method of lubricating everything inside.

 

 

When the Santa Fe moved its museum collection to Sacramento the 5021 was towed with the main rods and piston rods in place.  The heat created by the pumping action kept causing hot box detectors to go off and thus dropping the signals to red.

 

Stuart

 

Right, but remember that the management of the Santa Fe, at that time, could have cared less about what happened INSIDE those cylinders! They were simply getting all that "old stuff" off their property, by giving it to the California State Railroad Museum, who wound up letting the equipment languish outdoors. Even that totally pristine Santa Fe Doodle-bug was stripped by copper thieves, due to lack of security buy the museum.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

I wonder why they are removing the main rod/rods?

Perhaps they don't want to worry about keeping the crosshead lubricated. Best I can remember, both 611 & 1218 were moved to Birmingham with their main rods removed. I'm sure Scott knows what he is doing and will make the proper preparations to get 611 there safely. I would also think that there will be a 25mph speed restriction when 611 does move to Spencer.

Last edited by Big Jim

Could it be that removing the main rod is easier than pulling the piston rod out?  Just pull the eccentric and the wrist pin, as opposed to opening the cylinder and trying to free up the piston rod while inside the bore?  Hot has the better way, but sometimes cheaper/faster is chosen.

 

UP took the easy way out in the olden days and just burned them off.  Yuk!

I'm not impressed for a couple of reasons.

 Using a non-impact socket on a air impact wrench??

 Trying to manually "pull" a rod by hand?? That's what prybars are made for as in use   your head and not your back. And why walk around with that rod? If it tips or falls       you sure as heck ain't gonna "catch" it.

Sorry but that's the 45+ years of being a heavy equipment/ crane mechanic side of me commenting. 

Originally Posted by CRH:

I'm not impressed for a couple of reasons.

 Using a non-impact socket on a air impact wrench??

 Trying to manually "pull" a rod by hand?? That's what prybars are made for as in use   your head and not your back. And why walk around with that rod? If it tips or falls       you sure as heck ain't gonna "catch" it.

Sorry but that's the 45+ years of being a heavy equipment/ crane mechanic side of me commenting. 

Not using a impact socket is not a safe idea.  But maybe there is something in the construction of the rod which makes using a pry bar unwise.

Its a good thing "we" know better, than the handful of guys that know the 611 better than anyone else in the world

 

 These guys aren't "heavy equipment mechanics" that have access to a "shop provided"  full line of specific tools, boom truck, whatever.  I don't believe they are being paid a "heavy equipment mechanic" wage either, if at all.

 

 Having said that, given the "background of those involved. I think if they wanted or needed to use a prybar they would have. I believe I saw "Snap On" on the socket as it went around, so at least if it broke they would get a free replacement, as long as they didn't say they used it on an impact. 

 

Personally, I thought they did a fine job with a few hands and a forklift, and if I recall the video correctly, no one got hurt.

 

Can't we just be greatful that 611 will run again one day? Theres simply no end to the critics on this forum. ****ed if you do, ****ed if you don't.

Last edited by RickO

And so it begins.  You have a mechanical team comprised of individuals, many who have wrenched on her before and know exactly what they are doing...and one of which who I believe was in that video who not only fired/maintained her before under NS, but also was hands on in prepping her for the long term storage.  He knows exactly what he's looking for and what to do.  There are times where you have to work with what you've got and make do...not to mention it really didn't seem as if a pry bar was needed.  Let's knock off the arm chair quarterbacking and let em' do their work.   

Originally Posted by pennsyk4:

God bless all those senior citizens bringing this giant back to life.

AMEN!  

 

Having viewed her many times as a static display, I'm looking forward to seeing her under steam at some point in the not-too-distant future.  Best wishes to the entire crew of talented and experienced folks working to give her a splendid new beginning.

I was wondering about the restoration process for 611. 

For the restoration to be completed in only 9 month what work will 611 need to meet this timeline. I can't see them breaking the engine down to the frame and starting pretty much from scratch. So I’m wondering if the boiler will need to be ultrasound tested and the 15 year inspection? Also I've heard that 611 flue time was up which also lead to retirement in 1994. Also I'm sure the drivers will need to be turned before she can be run again. Does anyone has any information to what work is going to be performed in the 9 month period?

Originally Posted by Southern Railway Sean:

I was wondering about the restoration process for 611. 

For the restoration to be completed in only 9 month what work will 611 need to meet this timeline. I can't see them breaking the engine down to the frame and starting pretty much from scratch.

 

Correct, and she wasn't broken down to the frame when she was originally restored to service, back in the 1980s.

 

So I’m wondering if the boiler will need to be ultrasound tested and the 15 year inspection?

 

Yes.

 

 

Also I've heard that 611 flue time was up which also lead to retirement in 1994.

 

Well, there really is no longer a term "flue time", as that is now part of the process of conducting the FRA mandated 15 year inspection, i.e. the flues/tubes come out to conduct the ultrasound, and are thus inspected and safe-ended as required.

 

Also I'm sure the drivers will need to be turned before she can be run again.

 

Why would you think that? 

 

Does anyone has any information to what work is going to be performed in the 9 month period?

 

Yes.

 

Hotwater, 

I was under the impression that turning the drivers was all part of the restoration process. Not know what the condition where when NS killed the steam program and parked 611 for the last 20 years. I know this isn't a case of throwing coal in firebox and water in the boiler and heating it up then off you go. I was just looking to see what work will be done in the 9 month timeframe to get 611 running again. Unless the Fire Up 611 campaign will release this information.

Originally Posted by rickoshay:

AFAIK, Spencer does not have a drop table. However, there is one at Shaffer's Crossing so last I heard the front truck rebuild is supposed to happen there. 

The Historic Spencer Shops does have a drop table large enough to drop 611's engine truck, however the table is non-functional. The last I heard, last year, was that NS MAY simply have the Spencer Shops' drop table repaired, sort of as "good will gesture" for providing a place to conduct the FRA 15 year inspection. Maybe things have changed, and they will drop 611's engine truck at Shaffer's Crossing?

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×