Skip to main content

 

Lionel has posted the following information on the new GG1 announced at York. There are some videos to see as well

 

www.lionel.com/brands/visionline

 

From the Lionel Website

From the company’s earliest days, Lionel has been celebrated for its ability to create the most innovative, ground-breaking model train products in the world. We rededicated ourselves to this lofty mission with the introduction of the Lionel LEGACY Control System®.

And now, with that platform in place, we’re taking yet another step forward. This year, Lionel proudly introduces a line of the most authentic, technically advanced trains and accessories ever made – a line of products that enable you to fulfill the promise … the Vision ... of LEGACY. So, it’s natural that we are calling this the Lionel VISION LineTM. In this collection of breathtaking products, you’ll find scale steam engines with more mechanical and operational realism than any you’ve ever seen or run. Scale diesels that demonstrate the same detailing and characteristics found in their “real life” counterparts. Operating rolling stock and interactive accessories that enhance the model train experience like never before. And these introductory offerings are only the beginning. From this year on, Lionel fans can look to our VISION Line to experience the “gold standard” in model train engineering, manufacturing, and most of all… VISION. In each successive year we will unveil a selection of products that will elevate our line to levels never before reached in our industry. The Vision Line is what Joshua Lionel Cowen always envisioned Lionel would be – the ultimate destination for the very best in model railroading.

Last edited by PSU1980
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by SDIV Tim:

That is not a scael sized GG-1. IMHO, The Williams version is the correct size

Tim, There is an excellent thread out here about the GG1s produced over the years started by Jonathan Pfiffer(sp?) that shows the JLC model as slightly longer than the Williams/Weaver/MTH which all seem to use the same chassis. The Lionel is the only one that has spoked drivers which is a nice touch...

Originally Posted by Charlie:

That is not new information (Vision Line) the GG1 section is new obviously. Not sure what Madison Avenue has to do with it?

Charlie,

 

Back in the good old days, most all of the nations biggest & best advertising/marketing agencies had the offices on Madison Avenue in New York City. Thus, the term "Madison Avenue marketing speak". In other words, lots of great big words that really tells is nothing.

Sam beat me to it, but Tim, you really need to educate yourself before you make inaccurate comments:

 

Scale GG1 Comparison - GG1s live on!

 

Jonathan Peiffers' thread has the most comprehensive information on the various 3 rail GG1's available, give is a read and come back here when your done.

 

 

Jack, I don't think the paragraph on Vision line is a bunch of "great big words that tell us nothing". Advertising yes, it’s not a technical bulletin of the Vision line operation, but it is not supposed to be either. 

 

While the original poster did not write that this was “new” material, it was presented in a way that might confuse some people. That is why I stated this is not new, in fact the message goes back 6 years now. People are already confused as to what Vision Line is supposed to be… mostly because they have not read the paragraph and a few others listed in the catalog(s). You can’t fix stupid, but you can’t blame Lionel for trying.

 

If anyone has a better way to convey what Vision Line is all about then by all means contact Lionel. I’m sure they will listen to any good ideas.

 

Charlie

 

Last edited by Charlie
Originally Posted by PSU1980:

 

...

From the Lionel Website

... The Vision Line is what Joshua Lionel Cowen always envisioned Lionel would be – the ultimate destination for the very best in model railroading.

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

How about THAT for a prime example of "Madison Avenue marketing speak"?

 

Originally Posted by Charlie:

... Not sure what Madison Avenue has to do with it?

I concluded quite some time ago, that Vision Line was nothing more than a re-branding of the JLC series products when Lionel management changed hands.  The JLC "brand" became victim of the "not invented on my watch" syndrome, so it was renamed to Vision Line.  Most folks saw through that in a heartbeat, but it was a prime example of executive egotism at its best.

 

Of course Madison Ave is often referenced as the tradition marketing machine for many a corporate ad campaign... hence the reference to "marketing speak" in the earlier post.  Again, most of us can see it coming within the first sentence or two of an appropriately word-smithed paragraph! 

 

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
I specifically said the information came from the Lionel website under the VisionLine GG1. If you clicked the link it took you to the comments I copied and pasted in the initial post. Second, I also noted that Lionel posted a few videos.

The point was not to debate any manufacturers previous releases but just to offer a place for to get official information on a new product announce by a manufacturer at one of the industries trade shows.

On the other hand, if you read the review mentioned it is comprehensive and written in 2008.
The reason given, and IMO not really a strong one, was that to add the ability that very few would use would be cost prohibitive.  I'm not sure how much work and cost is involved but it seems to me to be minimal.  But then again I don't know all the engineering that goes into that so I could be wrong.
 
 
Originally Posted by Bill T:

Was there a reason given that Lionel's latest & greatest GG-1 would not be operational through the pantographs. Seems that would be the ultimate operating feature of a GG-1.

 

    Bill T.

 

Originally Posted by MartyE:
The reason given, and IMO not really a strong one, was that to add the ability that very few would use would be cost prohibitive.  I'm not sure how much work and cost is involved but it seems to me to be minimal.  But then again I don't know all the engineering that goes into that so I could be wrong.
 
 
Originally Posted by Bill T:

Was there a reason given that Lionel's latest & greatest GG-1 would not be operational through the pantographs. Seems that would be the ultimate operating feature of a GG-1.

 

    Bill T.

 

I have no clue either how complicated it would be but MTH trolleys can be converted to run on a wire. It's on my to do list someday as I believe it's not too difficult.  Of course they are pretty simple critters by comparison.  I must say I like the remote controlled pantograph. But I'm not sure about the sparking feature. To my eye this model will need a catenary, working or otherwise.

 

(And yeah I choked on the marketing copy, too. Lots of words saying nothing until I scrolled down and found the video. Wish it had sound 'though to get a sense of the stereo speakers. Overall, I like it but not in this short line's RR budget.)

 

Tomlinson Run Railroad

 Lionel fans can look to our VISION Line to experience the “gold standard” in model train engineering, manufacturing, and most of all… VISION. In each successive year we will unveil a selection of products that will elevate our line to levels never before reached in our industry.

 

Not really as Lionel is just following the Germans lead when it comes to the "Gold Standard". Kiss Modellbahnen came out with steam locomotives emitting steam from steam chests and blowdowns over 10 years ago.

 

Heljan & ESU LokSounds have recently come out with a Nohab Diesel that has Led's mounted under the trucks that flash to emulate wheel sparking when going into curves/ wheel flange sounds play. Doing the same by installing Led's into the pantographs is the same technology.   

Originally Posted by TomlinsonRunRR:
Originally Posted by MartyE:
The reason given, and IMO not really a strong one, was that to add the ability that very few would use would be cost prohibitive.  I'm not sure how much work and cost is involved but it seems to me to be minimal.  But then again I don't know all the engineering that goes into that so I could be wrong.
 
 
Originally Posted by Bill T:

Was there a reason given that Lionel's latest & greatest GG-1 would not be operational through the pantographs. Seems that would be the ultimate operating feature of a GG-1.

 

    Bill T.

 

I have no clue either how complicated it would be but MTH trolleys can be converted to run on a wire. It's on my to do list someday as I believe it's not too difficult.  Of course they are pretty simple critters by comparison.  I must say I like the remote controlled pantograph. But I'm not sure about the sparking feature. To my eye this model will need a catenary, working or otherwise.

 

(And yeah I choked on the marketing copy, too. Lots of words saying nothing until I scrolled down and found the video. Wish it had sound 'though to get a sense of the stereo speakers. Overall, I like it but not in this short line's RR budget.)

 

Tomlinson Run Railroad

When the MTH GG1s are converted to run overhead, do they loose the ability to remotely control the pantographs?  From what little I know about electronics and circuity, it would be a pain to have the LEDs for the sparks and to get power from overhead.  Doable, yes, but costly like they said.  You'd have an issue with teh power from the overhead wire arcing to the LEDs which would burn them out, and possibly short out the LED control board.  If they make a zone on the panograph that was just for pickup, how many people would be willing to invest all the time required to make sure to move their overhead wires to make sure they never went out of the power up zone?  I know there are some here that do power from over head, and I know some don't.  I want to put lines up for my semi-scale GG1 and EP-5, but they will be for looks only, so a sparking but dummy pantograph would be great for me, if it could go on O45 over even O36 curves.

Originally Posted by Charlie:

I understand the reason for running overhead power in the old days, what possible reason, from an operator’s point of view; would one want to operate under powered catenary lines in today’s world?

 

Charlie

The Chicagoland Chapter of the European Train Enthusiasts (HO) can and do on their modular display railroad.  It's a source of pride.

 

ETE Harper

(They can also operate stud-rail AC, 2-rail DC and DCC...)

 

Rusty

Attachments

Images (1)
  • ETE Harper
Last edited by Rusty Traque

Charlie posted:
I understand the reason for running overhead power in the old days, what possible reason, from an operator’s point of view; would one want to operate under powered catenary lines in today’s world?
-----------------
Umm.... perhaps for a model railroader to achieve the greatest amount of "realism" when operating their layout.

Hmmm ???

I mean, isnt that what werall wanting to do?

I sure hope this visionline gg1 isn't gonna cost $2000 for a few pantagraph sparks for gosh sakes.  And as we all know the gg1 horn is obnoxious.

Riki posted:

"I mean, isnt that what werall wanting to do?"

No, if that were the case, more people would have been operating this way for the past 50 years or so. To my knowledge, only Marty Fitzhenery has been the only person on this forum to publicly state and show how he operates via overhead wire. So, lets pretend that I may have missed five other people. Is that really a reason to advance the cause of running live overhead? I don't think so.

 

Charlie posted:

I understand the reason for running overhead power in the old days, what possible reason, from an operator’s point of view; would one want to operate under powered catenary lines in today’s world?

 

Charlie

Are you talking about full scale or model?

The monorail here in Las Vegas is electric. There is a high voltage bar that the train picks up from. The problem of having an electric train on the ground would be having high voltage where the public could step on it, unless it was overhead.

But then aren't most trains electric, they just carry a stinky old diesel around with them to charge em up. There's an idea, put diesel motors in GM Volts, problem solved.

 

Last edited by GVDobler

I understand the reason for running overhead power in the old days, what possible reason, from an operator’s point of view; would one want to operate under powered catenary lines in today’s world?

Charlie

Well, for starters, if you did not like the looks of the center rail and did not want the complexities of 2-rail, that would be a reason.  Lots easier than stud rail, surely?

Spoked drivers?  One of my GG1s has spoked drivers; the rest have those proper quill style drivers.  I think Ed Alexander's castings are still used on 2-rail GG1s.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×