Skip to main content

This is definitely showing how green I am to the world of trains.  I have a Postwar Santa Fe 2343 Locomotive (AA), no B unit yet.  Anyways, what I was wondering is does it make more sense for the running numbers to both not be 2343.  In a real life situation wouldn't they be numbered sequentially such as 2343 2344 or some other number?  I'm assuming this is just for mass production that they are both numbered the same.  In that case though, wouldn't it make more sense to run a 2333 dummy with a 2343 engine?  I know that would mean breaking up a set though.  Anyways, thoughts anyone?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Each locomotive on a given RR has a unique number; it's the primary day-to-day

ID number. As Mr. Traque stated, in the early days of dieseldom, a "set" of

F3's, for example, would have suffixed numbers, on some roads. This is because, suddenly,

RR's had trouble defining "locomotive". I mean, you couldn't break up your 4-6-6-4 and

run part of it today, then all of it tomorrow, again. Some early diesels were semi-permanently attached with drawbars. (Seems like shooting yourself in the foot.)

 

Lionel's models/toys were mass-produced, as you said, and the kids didn't care, plus

the adults who used Lionel's stuff for model RR'ing could change it. "Breaking up"

the set is what diesel loco railroading was all about.

 

The GM&O used letter suffixes on their EMD F's (800B, for example - an "A" unit!)

right up until the ICG merger in 1972. They never did that with their more-common

ALCO FA's. Odd.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
CONTACT US
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×