For those of you how have built your layout with such care and precision as if real live people were riding in your passenger cars, this topic is probably not for you, unless you are in the mood for a good laugh.
I am a scrounger at heart, who spent as little money as possible, and took every imaginable short cut, when I built my current layout 25 years ago. It was, and is, a Rube Goldberg project. LOL.
If you are a serious model railroader whose goal is to completely eliminate derailments, I strongly recommend that you do not treat your track work like a Rube Goldberg project the way I did. LOL.
This morning I was running my pride and joy - a 1964 Lionel 773 Hudson that I recently purchased from my LHS. IMO, running a big locomotive like a 773 is a good way to detect any defects on an O Gauge tubular track layout like mine with 031 curves and 022 switches. Also, IMO, the 773 was brilliantly designed for maximum size and performance on a well built O Gauge (not 027) tubular track layout with sharp curves like mine.
My 773, particularly the four front wheels, was like a railroad safety engineer, with zero tolerance for shoddy trackwork!
After a couple of hours of hard work (Rube Goldberg must have been rollover in his grave), I corrected several defects that caused derailments by using a shortcut that cost me nothing (Rube is happy again): shims (little pieces of wood or asphalt shingles), which did the trick, satisfying the sensitive front wheels of my glorious Hudson.
So, I am curious: how many of you use shims to remove derailments on your layout. If so, what did you specifically do when installing the shims.
Also, please feel free to share your thoughts about this subject and post, including how crazy you think I am if that is the way you feel.
Later I will post some photos about my track and shims beneath it.
LOL, Arnold