Originally Posted by srook:
A few thoughts:
A few took me to task for contemplating restoring such nice original cars but offered that cars in worse condition were ok for restoration. Who decides the line? Restoration is restoration whether the original is a roach or a nice straight piece. If restoration is good for the goose it has to be alright for the gander too.
I specifically chose these cars/set as they are plentiful and quite cheap in original condition. Mine were by no means spectacular original examples or rare. To me collector value is not what I was after here. I'm glad to have removed some original examples from the collector pool if that makes anyone feel better.
I am quite new to the hobby and do not have a permanent layout. For me part of the appeal lies in the work to clean/fix/restore these old toys. The cars pictured already got the clean, buff, and wax treatment. To be honest they looked much better in the pics than in person. Preservation is not lost on me as I have several cars and locos that cleaned up really nice and will not get restoration. Maybe I will come to regret my decision but I can't wait to see this set looking like new running around our Christmas tree this year.
Thanks for all the input
Scott
Your "where do you call the line" comment is a good one.
We've all been where you are. When I was new to the hobby, I thought restoration was a way to have nice tinplate without being able to afford the nice original pieces. You know, put time and effort into a restoration. I had experience in car restoration, so this is relatively easy. So, early on, I "restored" pieces pieces, some roaches, as you call them, but some were C-6 examples, which I would call your two cars. I was happy for a while, but then I realized a couple things.
Part of the aura of prewar is it's past. It had a life before you, probably several lives. When you restore a piece, even a roach, you destroy that, and you take away something collectors really learn to appreciate. After a while, you view a C-6 piece through the eyes of the kid that put all those nicks and scratches in it.
So when restoring things, I kinda put C-6 as my low end for originality, no matter what car, engine, etc, that it is. Now, there are some pieces that I would not restore, no matter what condition. Certain pieces like the Girard green City of Denver, China Blue cars, Ives stuff in general, I would not restore, in any condition. That's because a green Denver car is an oddity, and tough to find. Repainting an original destroys what makes it unique, the fact that it was originally green. Anyone can take a common Flying Yankee car and paint it green, but it's not a green Denver car, if that makes any sense at all.
Your pictured stuff falls in the category of "too nice to restore" for me. As for the 248 and separate car, well, if they are rough, no harm, no foul. Restoring a really bad piece saves an example of the past.
I just wanted to share my experience, because, looking back after 15 plus years, I realize that some of my "restorations" actually ended up destroying a piece's past, when, in reality, in my now "aged" opinion, they were nice items.
I restored some C-6 pieces, that now, I would now view as beautiful in their own rite. As a result, I now perform "conservation" of a piece, which is just minimal things to enhance looks and operation, like motor rebuilds, or replacing a broken or missing coupler/trim item, while refraining from doing a complete dismantle/repaint.
It's ultimately the decision of the train's owner to determine it's fate. Some collectors buy high end items, some have trains that don't run, and would not think about replacing even a decayed driver wheel because it takes originality away from the piece, while others choose to perform restorations, or own and operate modern tinplate. You just need to find out where your interests fall, and you can only do that by experiencing different facets of the hobby.