Skip to main content

I saw these three track planning hints in the Atlas O catalog today. I'm considering having a wye on the short wall of the around-the-room level of the layout (the upper level). The idea is that I'll add a wye and have the full length of the room to create a long "stub-end" that can support full-scale passenger trains without ever impacting the freight yard and switch operations on the lower level (the current main level).

Looking at these diagrams, I see the obvious utility in examples A and C, but what is the value in A vs B? Is B given as a way to save a few inches of width or is it just a matter of aesthetics for longer cars going through the curve?



Attachments

Images (1)
  • 072 curves
Last edited by CharmCityAirLine
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I used B to access my yard on my current layout because I thought it was cool.  The wye is on the inter loop of a 3-track oval mainline.  I didn't have the extra inches for A on the inner loop.  As result I gave up 37" of length (3 car's worth) on every yard track.  At the time the loss of storage didn't seem critical as the yard is on a 18' by 4' peninsula.  However, every turnout in the yard ladder costs you another storage spot. So what I thought would be plenty of storage wasn't (when dealing with full length passenger cars and lashups).  My work around is to move the wye to the outside loop and elevate the two inner loops.

Jan

Let me start by agreeing with both of you: it does look cooler. My first thought when I saw B was, "that looks interesting."

@Jan At first glance I knew it was longer, but I wasn't thinking twice as long! Considering I'm making a ladder too, I see your point. Real estate is a lot smaller once I started drawing this out in the app. The length of the last track is looking pretty sad.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×