Replies sorted oldest to newest
What is there to debunk? I don't know if it's worth the cost, but the stuff is real.
I poked around a little on the web. Found some reviews from Clock, firearms, and machinest type sites (blogs).
I guess I'd summarize them as mixed. Some folks seem to love the product, others think its just another oil.
I didn't see any reviews from train type people.
That's kind of what i wondered, does it noticeably reduce friction better than 3 in 1 oil. I'm wondering how the various viscosities are acheived with one tiny nolecule (the claim) and no additives.
Seems to me these carbon microspheres are too small to be effective. Most ground surfaces have crevices left by the abrasives that are deeper than .09 microns meaning these "ball bearings" would not contact both surfaces.
Pete
Seems to me these carbon microspheres are too small to be effective. Most ground surfaces have crevices left by the abrasives that are deeper than .09 microns meaning these "ball bearings" would not contact both surfaces.
Pete
That would presume that all lubricants are prediocated on single molecule interactions to perform - the layers of most lubricants are far greater than that distance and that should be taken to indicate that there would be multiple layers of molecules acting as a lubricant.
That size is also rather close to a C60 fullerene that's been probably been carboxylated (anionic according to the advert). I wonder how much or percentage of such a material is actually in this product.
$42. an ounce.......no thanks.