Skip to main content

It is that time of year when my O gauge layout goes under the Christmas tree.  I generally run 2 or 3 loops to have several engines going at one time.  Overtime, I have had engine attrition and down to 2 loops to run a trolley and a diesel SD70  MTH Proto 3.0 engine.  The SD70 has been repaired multiple times and is not reliable, mostly due to wire breakage, grounding issues, motors and LEDs.  I think this engine, while spec'd for 031 is really sized and designed for 054. The trucks have to turn a lot for the 031 turns, thus places a lot of wear on the wiring.   I typically run the engines for several hours a night at 7 to 10mph.   My son and I have also limited the zig zag turns around furniture to limit the motion, but we still have the failures.

I think that if the SD70 dies again this season, I will just replace it with a new steamer, smaller diesel or a switcher type engine.  I would think that a diesel with a 4 wheel truck or steamer with x-6-x (like a 4-6-0 or 4-6-4) would work better for reliability.   

Is there any advice for which engine type is better for more heavy use on 031 that has many twists?  I searched and did not find this topic, if you know of a thread, please point me there.

Thanks-Bill

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

My personal opinion:

If you’ve already “downsized” to having only 2 loops and one of those loops runs a trolley(which I assume is dependable considering you’ve switched to it and kept it) I’d follow the advice of @raising4daughters in terms of going the LionChief Plus route- if you want to stay non-conventional. Considering that you’re running for several hours a night, I’ve found that my RMT Buddy, with weekly minor-maintenance(I.e. cleaning the wheels and rails), is capable of pulling a 7 car consist, but then I’m also OCD when it comes to such maintenance ha. My 1999 Williams GP-9, 1995 K-Line S-2 and RMT 2010ish(?) Buddy have never done me wrong for 3+ hours whether I’m running pre-war, post-war or modern. I’ll also echo @Lou1985 and say that you can’t go wrong with GEEPs or F-units, in general.

Best of luck!

Steve

Popi posted:

Alco FA units. I have several and they travers O31 curves with ease.

I had this longing for a set of F3s even though I have mainly traditional and O27 equipment. Just had to have a set of F3s. Now that I have them, I find myself wondering if I should sell them and get the B&O FA units that Lionel did in LC+.  I like how my Postwar FA's, less close to scale size, look on my layout better than the F3s.

Bill you mention in your post a modern diesel. While the above recommendations are certainly good, if you are wanting something more modern in a diesel, the early ones made by MTH under the Railking banner (and later the Rugged Rails banner) will all work (and were designed to run) on 031 curves. I ran a MTH Railking Dash 9 on 027 curves and turnouts and it worked fine.

If memory serves me right, there was a Dash 9, an SD60 and a SD90MAC which are all around 14-1/2 inches in total length. Though most of these engines are older models and I don't think they're Proto 3. They were also made in horn only versions, indicated by a -0 suffix at the end of the product number.

But.... MTH is currently once again putting these modern selectively compressed diesels into their starter sets, so these new ones would have Proto 3.

Lionel has also tooled up a brand new selective compressed Tier4 diesel for the traditional starter set line, which is being premiered in a BNSF set, but won't be out until the end of this year or the beginning of next year. Lionel will no doubt be using this diesel in other starter sets and maybe even in the LionChief+ separate sale line up.

Note that the Atlas small SW8/9 models have articulated couplers to enhance small curve operation.  The coupler mounting and connection to the car are extremely important.  My experience with these small Atlas models was that O36 was a minimum, with fixed pilots and truck mounted couplers.   Smaller curves, even with the articulated couplers tended to de-rail the connected car. 

Fixed pilots and KD coupler conversions limit swing and minimum radius.  IMO, Mike CT. 

Last edited by Mike CT

  MTH DCS can run many TMCC in command if I'm not mistaken. Sometimes some features are lost, but basic operation is there I think.

  Steam will not have the flex issue except on wire tethered tenders.  That flex issue is now confined to tender roller alone.   I find 6 driver steam to suit my needs best; traction, turns, and tracking combined. The LC+ camelback has my eye today  

  All diesel trucks still need to turn the same angles. Short truck, long truck, long frame, short frame, short wheelbase or long, centipede, or SW; it doesnt matter.  A given curve causes the same tangent angle on each truck, so the wire movement you fear, is always there and the same on ANY diesel (or electric).

   If lack of wire slack or being beefy enough to last is all that keeps a engine from being used on a curve that builder is likely the real the issue imo

  Properly securing wire for flex takes thought and careful securing in just the right places. It's obvious asthethics win here at times. The ultimate cure is less wires though.

  Where couplers binding are an issue, adding articulated couplers to a designated lead freight car can help. 

 I noticed my GG-1 could pull passenger cars around 0-27 but not freight. A little while later I had a caboose on each end with articulated couplers added, and freight in between. No more bind!  Any car would do though.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×