Skip to main content

Just for more grins I took some gray outdoor carpet I had, cut it in to 1/2" strips and laid them between my rails on one loop. Darkened the center rail with a big marker pen(which worked pretty good) and will wait until daylight tomorrow to see the results. Doesn't look bad though. Nice thing about the carpet-you just lay it right around the curves. Plus you could glue ballast to the top or paint ties on it. On the outside, glue a strip to hide the metal ties-glue or tack the edge down. Some ballast and weeds and you are done.

Originally Posted by falconservice:

What is missing from the ScaleTrax product line?

 

Andrew

There are currently no WYE's of any size, no curved turnouts of any size, no slip switches, and no 3-ways. The #4s and #6s have been extremely scarce for a couple years now as well. So pretty much only O-31, O-54, or O-72 turnouts are available.

Last edited by jonnyspeed

Thank you all for this thread.  I have been away from the OGR Forum for several years & was out of date with the track situation.   I recently visited two local hobby shops & looked at their track selections.  Both the HO shop & O-gauge shop carry Lionel FasTrack (but no longer carry Atlas-O track).  Neither has ever carried MTH ScaleTrax.  The O-Gauge shop Also carries Gargraves & Ross track (but no longer carries MTH RealTrax).  

 

I have RealTrax that I used for the Carpet Central around the X-mas tree, but do to connectivity issues stopped setting up the Carpet Central at X-mas.  I also have some Atlas-O straight & curved pieces that I have collected for my eventual layout, but have not bought any more in at lest a decade.  

 

After reading your thread, I conclude that I should probably use the GG/Ross track for my layout and maybe FasTrack for Carpet Central around the X-mas tree (our granddaughter will be 5 months in Dec-2015, so my wife wants me to set up the CC around the tree).  

 

What do you all recommend for Carpet Central around the X-mas tree ? 

 

Thanks in advance !

Last edited by CBQ_Bill

WOW !  Thank you, Montclair.  

 

I will invest in some FasTrack for Carpet Central.  

 

Back in the late 1990s & early 2000s, I had similar thoughts to many of you when the various O-gauge manufacturers introduced their own track systems from MTH (RealTrax + ScaleTrax)), Lionel (FasTrack in addition to tubular), Atlas-O (3-rail & 2-Rail Ni-Ag and 3-rail steel), K-Line, etc.  None of them had a complete system at introduction and the O-gauge hobby did not seem large enough to support multiple complete track systems.  It is too bad that the manufacturers did not pool their resources for a few common track systems (tubular, pre-ballasted, & detailed) that they all could sell.  The plethora of track systems is confusing & frustrating to newcomers & existing O-gaugers.   This situation makes the hobby seem too "realistic" in the sense that track choice becomes as "enjoyable & fun" as going to work, filling out IRS tax forms, or having a root canal.  

 

Based on your inputs, I will probably go with GG/Ross for my layout & FasTrack for Carpet Central.  

 

Thank you all !

 

Originally Posted by jim pastorius:

Just for more grins I took some gray outdoor carpet I had, cut it in to 1/2" strips and laid them between my rails on one loop. Darkened the center rail with a big marker pen(which worked pretty good) and will wait until daylight tomorrow to see the results. Doesn't look bad though. Nice thing about the carpet-you just lay it right around the curves. Plus you could glue ballast to the top or paint ties on it. On the outside, glue a strip to hide the metal ties-glue or tack the edge down. Some ballast and weeds and you are done.

 

Originally Posted by PSU1980:

Great idea, post some pictures when you can

Yes, sounds interesting, would also like to see pics !

Last edited by Ace

In the cold light of the dawn, the cheap, thinner gray carpet looks better.  The other is a bit too neat looking for ballast. the local discount store is where I bought the gray carpet so tomorrow I plan to buy enough to cut in to strips and do some of my track. Not sure about painting ties on it-might try some.  I like to experiment plus when I figure how to post pictures, I will.  The scaletrax photo looks good.

CBQ-Bill....sure describes my feelings and frustration about track systems (and that is not the only area concerning incompatible systems)....some vanishing and incomplete...never had that problem in HO...Atlas had track, all the trains ran on it..end of story.  Now, in threee rail, not even Atlas has track, a lot is not compatible with what comes in beginners' sets (and we want to get more people in this hobby?)  There is a thread running about stupid questions asked of displayers at shows...someone had a board with a comparison of the SIZES/scales of track to explain it to the train challenged.  I think I need a board that shows just ALL the O three rail track system samples, to me.

 

I understand that you can't please everyone.  I really do.  And I think I will give it a little longer before I move on.  The scale bug has bitten and there's really no turning back.  Going back to the large tubular type track just isn't what I'm interested in. To each his own.....I know.  It's like saying "go back to HO".........never!! I won't hold my breath, but if no good news comes from York regarding Scaletrax or a miracle saving grace from another producer, then I think I just might invest in another hobby. I have one too many anyway.  

Originally Posted by Ron045:
...

Nothing flex can't fix.

 

Exactly.  Most of the guys who would choose ScaleTrax probably wouldn't be all that averse to using flex track for nice, broad radii curves.  Nothing beats the look of a train traveling through a broad S-curve... the kind that only flex track can produce.

 

That's why it was such a terrible faux pas that MTH couldn't produce wye's, curved turnouts, slips, double-crossovers, and yard turnouts like a 3-way or 4-way offered by Ross.  A full line of numbered turnouts wouldn't have hurt either.  Tooling exists for #4's and #6's, but no #8's or #10's.  At this point, most ScaleTrax fans would just be happy to get their hands on those #4's and #6's! 

 

A lot to ask for... yes.  But if you're gonna bill your system as the most realistic out there, then you gotta ante up with at least SOME of the specialty trackwork.  Although the "scale crowd" appears to be growing each year, I still get the impression that nobody's rushing their way to hand-laying track and building custom turnouts (yet). 

 

David 

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer

I love the look of it, but your options are limited, you get more turnout options in RealTrax or FastTrack. If this were N scale or HO you may be able to get by with #4's and 6's an maybe make a wye because you can adapt the in space to fit that but being that O scale takes up so much real estate a guy needs all the options he can get.

Originally Posted by Matt Makens:

I love the look of it, but your options are limited, you get more turnout options in RealTrax or FastTrack. If this were N scale or HO you may be able to get by with #4's and 6's an maybe make a wye because you can adapt the in space to fit that but being that O scale takes up so much real estate a guy needs all the options he can get.

About the smallest wye you can build using left or righ-hand turnouts is what I refer to as a "pinwheel wye" -- basically three 60-degree arcs. I've designed them with #6 turnouts and broader curves and even did a Free-Mo version with 72 inch radius (O-144) as a series of design studies.

 

 

O-54_Pinwheel_Wye

Attachments

Images (1)
  • O-54_Pinwheel_Wye

I've got about six + cases of it now stocked up and I'm waiting for the # turn outs. If they never come I'll get some built, or adapt with Atlas ones.

 I run 2 rail mainly so this high line loop is for guest equipment (grandkid's). I could even go without any switches believe it or not.

Edit: I did locate both #4 and #6 switches.

Last edited by Engineer-Joe

I briefly looked at the GG & Ross websites.  I Like the idea of their sectional track.

 

What are the advantages & disadvantages of the following:

 

1. Plastic Ties vs Wood Ties ?

2. Are plastic ties only available in black ?

3. Are wood ties only available in brown ?

4. Stainless Steel Rails vs Tin-Pated Steel Rails ?

5. Center Rail Black vs All Rails Shiny ?  

6. Does the black center rail cause connectivity issues ?

7. GG vs Ross switches / turnouts ?

 

Thanks in advance !

 

C.Sam - I initially thought that your photo of BNSF 4293 was a prototype photo.  Very realistic layout !

Originally Posted by RadioRon:
Originally Posted by Montclaire:

From another thread on OGR:

 

Montclaire, do you know if there is a diagram for this one on the Forum?    Very nice!

 

RadioRon,

 

  If no one else comes up with one before tomorrow morning, I draw it in RR track and post a screen shot. (Have a show tonight or I'd do it now if I were home).

 

From the looks of it, it looks to be a 45degree crossover with O36 on the outer loop and O31 on the inner loops.   Looks like a 10" straight going into tunnel.  Most likely a 4.5 or 5" (maybe even some .175 fitters) on the opposite side.  On the back side looks like 10 and 5.

 

Again just guesses based on memory from building loops with crossovers.

Last edited by EscapeRocks

I am going to wait and see if MTH delivers the promised #4 and #6 turnouts in November.  I like the looks of the ScaleTrax system.  I have many miles of track in both flex/rigid 30" long straight sections and sectional curves/straights.  Have all the turnouts I need except for the #4 and #6 turnouts.  I have a lot invested so far in ScaleTrax.  If necessary though, I will switch track systems.  Time will tell.  I have attached a copy of my layout plan.

 

I have completed the 8 ft module located at 6 o'clock.  It's the module with the grain facility.  I'm getting ready to start the turn module to the right of the 8 ft module very soon.  After that module I'll need the #4s and #6s to keep going.

 

Playroom Central BC3R #7ag3c7h6-CJ-5a

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Erie and Rockland Railroad
Last edited by Erie Bob
Ok, Dec 2012 issue of CTT, in Fastrack. Credit to James L Fry, rough dimensions 4'6" deep by 6' wide.

1 - 45' crossing
16 - O-36 curves
4 - 10 inch straights
2 - 5 inch straights
1 - 4.5 inch straight
3 - 1.75 inch straights
3 - 1.375 inch straights

From the crossing, inside loop, clockwise:  2 - 1.375 str, 7 curves, 1 - 1.75 str. 

Exiting the crossing, forming the outside loop, clockwise:  1 - 1.75 str, 1 curve, 1 - 3.75 str, 1 - 4.5 str, 2 curves, 1 - 10 str, 1 - 5 str, 2 curves, 3 - 10 strs, 2 curves, 1 - 5 str, 2 curves, 1 - 1.75 str. 

If anyone does a schematic for all O-31 Fastrack or O-27 tubular please post.  Tks

I was able to buy enough new ScaleTrax product to build 2 loops around my room. The 0-54 and 0-72 switches are in stock.

I was told that the #4 and #6 switches are in route from china. Expected to be available to ship in March. A few more weeks and we'll know if this is getting any better for those who want to use scaletrax.

I, like many of you, after watching Rich B's videos planned on ordering Scaletrax, but after almost 2 years of waiting I gave up, and went the Gargraves/Ross route. Each track has its advantages and disadvantages. 

In all fairness, Mike is busy on the European front, and that probably is where the most money for MTH is these days.

Regardless, I am happy with the choice I wound up making, and haven't looked back.

Greg

enginEErjon posted:

...

I was told that the #4 and #6 switches are in route from china. Expected to be available to ship in March. A few more weeks and we'll know if this is getting any better for those who want to use scaletrax.

Curious... when were you told this information?  I called MTH this week, and specifically inquired whether these #'d turnouts were "on the water".  I was told, no they are not... due to changes in the factory production schedules.    Now I realize the information we get is only as accurate as the person on the other end of the phone.  But the person who told me this information was very helpful in referring me to MTH dealers who had purchased ScaleTrax #4 turnouts in the past.  I have sourced all but ONE #4RH turnout.  Several places I called had a couple of #4LH's, but I came up dry on the one elusive #4RH I need to complete the ScaleTrax manifest of track for my new layout.  The #4RH SKU is 45-1051.  So if anyone out there has one they're not gonna use, I would greatly appreciate letting me know.

There seems to be no significant availability issues finding most ScaleTrax items right now.  But the #4 and #6 turnouts -- for the most part -- are nowhere to be found.  And many shops I called indicated they don't stock MTH ScaleTrax because they haven't had any demand for it.  So dealers are hesitant to tie up $$$$ in inventory that just sits around in the store for a year or more.  So they'll order it only if they receive consumer orders.  Unfortunately, MTH has ZERO inventory in Columbia, MD for some of the items in the product line right now -- especially the #'d turnouts.

So we have a bit of a "Which comes first?  The chicken or the egg?" syndrome here.  And it's frustrating for ScaleTrax enthusiasts.   

I LOVED the Super-O "appearance" back in the 1960's.  So I was really drawn to ScaleTrax when I saw Rich Battista's Black Diamond Videos a few years ago.  But I had already purchased a lot of Atlas-O over the years.  When I was planning a dual Standard Gauge and O-Gauge layout, I was thinking more along the lines of Gargraves/Ross.  So I began selling off my Atlas-O track last year... and the last of it is now listed on my current for-sale ad here on the forum.

When I recently decided to go back to a dedicated O-Gauge layout and a dedicated Standard Gauge layout, I stumbled upon SideTrack Hobbies literally blowing out all their MTH ScaleTrax inventory at unheard of prices.  And I thought... now is as good a time as any to jump on board with ScaleTrax for my O-Gauge layout -- knowing I might face a challenge or two in the #'d turnout department.  And for the most part, I had no problem sourcing what I needed.  But the story wouldn't have had as happy an ending if I needed LOTS of the #'d turnouts.  Because they just don't exist right now -- at least not in quantities that you can aggressively plan a modern-day "basement empire" or club layout that makes judicious use of them.    I only needed two #4LH and two #4RH, and I'm 3 for 4 right now -- just hoping to find one more #4 RH, and I'll be all set.

I can understand Mike may have different priorities in terms of product development right now.  But quite frankly, if you're gonna market a "track system" and get folks all excited about it, it's not the type of thing that should be treated as an afterthought with zero inventory levels sitting in their MD warehouse.  And right now ScaleTrax is being treated exactly in that way -- like it's been pushed onto the back-burner so to speak.  As Lee Ioacoca was famous for saying in those great automobile commercials in the 1990's... "Either lead, follow, or get out of the way."  And I don't think Mike is doing any of those things with ScaleTrax right now.  And that's a shame. 

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer

Seems like Mike really bungled Scaletrax from the get-go. He could have owned the 3-rail scale market, as far as track is concerned. The low rail profile was a close to 2-rail scale as we've seen. But, the tie spacing was the first of many missteps with the product. I'd still like to know how that one got past  the design, prototyping and approval process at MTH? Did no one ever see real railroad tracks? 

Either way, it's water under the bridge now as the product is apparently far down on the priority list at MTH.

 

 

Why did MTH put tracks & switches on recent flat cars?  Is it just to blow out existing inventory or just tease us?  Last March when I was rebuilding/designing a new layout, I couldn't find it locally and Atlas was almost as bad.  I can't understand why these rail manufacturers are blind to the needs of the scale modeler. I guess there are better margins in flooding the market with engines and rolling stock.   I was frustrated and just used old tubular from my layout b4 the move and saved at least $2k. Luckily I'm not a purest....  I am looking at Gargraves however for a future layout in a year or so.  By the way the $2k found it's way to engines and rolling stock.

Can't anyone get a straight answer from MTH and especially Mike Wolf himself about the overall plans for ScaleTrax?  Really a shame as it is a very good track system to work with and arguable the best looking for the scale modeler.

The story I heard many years ago was that Mike sent a couple of guys out in Baltimore to measure some real track and they evidently stumbled upon 'siding' of some sorts resulting in the poor tie spacing.  Too bad no one double-checked the data used.

How about you Marty F?  Can you get the 'real poop' on the future of this excellent track system?  They have devoted a lot of catalog pages over the years to temp us but this situation is quite unprofessional...

I did manage to get the switches I was after. They look brand new. Where they came from, I don't know?

I can only guess that the problem might stem, or be affected, from the hastles of manufacturing in the foreign lands? I've read time and again that all of the manufacturers have problems getting duplicate runs down the road. The plants close, or switch production, molds are lost or damaged, fights over ownership, etc.

I also wonder what kind of profit margin there are on these switches? Would it be a strain on available assets? How many scales and directions are MTH covering at one time?

As consumers we want it now! Waiting a few years seems ridiculous. I bet that it's what it takes to get these products to market. You can "fast track" some stuff, but not everything. Must be some priority list made somewhere.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Ste 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×