This is an interesting thread. I understand what Vernon is saying, but the original poster said that he had older versions of this loco that didn't exhibit the same problem. Assuming that the older versions are mechanically identical, it comes down to the electronics/programming.
Thinking aloud... what would happen if Tom moved the motor with the tach to the front set of drivers (and why didn't Lionel do it this way in the first place?) Also, what would a Cruise commander do in this situation (since it's not tach-based?)
I can't imagine that the result would be different, perhaps occurring in different layout locations if you moved the tach to the other motor. The real problem is that either truck can lose traction and when the tach controlled motor loses traction, the torque of both motors drops to near nothing. This is a basic fault of the design with only one motor having the tach.
The obvious reason that most scale articulated steam doesn't experience this issue is there is only one large tach controlled motor, so if either power truck has traction, things keep rolling along.
We'd probably have to know more about the "earlier version" of the Big Boy to intelligently comment as to why it might not be having the same issue. Truthfully, I've worked on the older TMCC Lionmaster Big Boy, and it's Odyssey control has exactly the same issue. In that model, the Odyssey tach reader is also on the rear motor, and you can do the exact same thing on the front power truck and get the same reaction, the wheels stop with any pressure.
The one thing that could be an issue is the pilot trucks somehow lifting the drivers off the track. This can happen if you don't have proper easements at the beginning or end of grades, something that bit me in previous layouts at times since I didn't have enough room (I thought).