Skip to main content

Myself and a friend recieved the New Lionel Milwaukee S-3 Cab #261's, both have NO CAB NUMBER ON TENDER REAR !!! I noticed on the 3rail scale forum a posting showing the #265 with the Cab # on the tender rear! Whats up ? Do only certain Cab #'s have it, or none, or were these were added? Wondering about other S-3's #261; #265, #267 ?
Thanks, RW Deano
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
quote:
Originally posted by J Daddy:
I have the 267, no cab no. on the rear of the tender. Just the water and coal capacity numbers.

I would think your bigger concern would be that #267 was an oil burner, and should have an oil tender and no ash pans on the sides of the firebox.



Hot water your going to make a great walmart greater
Ever stop to think how difficult it is to find photos of the rear end of tenders? Sometimes you see a shot that would show whether there is a number there or not but the engine is coupled to cars and you can't really see the back of the tender. I must have looked at several hundred locomotive photos, by way of answering Deano's question, and only found two or three that showed the right angle. (And on those photos, as I mentioned, there was no road number back there.)

Regarding the discussion of the correct tender for the #267, this particular model SHOULD have an oil tank tender and no ash pan. Yes the engine was built as a coal burner, but it's conversion to oil occurred either after the front end was modified with the later style smoke box door, or was made at the same time. To show the engine as it's earlier coal burner configuration would require that it had the original front end, as built, instead of the later modification.

Paul Fischer
Oh, those of us who paint and letter steamers often curse the photographers who seem to know only
one camera angle: front, three-quarter. It actually can get boring! So many good shots were missed. My two rail fan photographer friends are always hearing me ask: "did you shoot the rear?" Diesel or not, the front
is not the rear.

I find it notable that the CMStP&P did not put loco numbers on the rear of their tenders. I learned something
new today. Why would they not? The added expense, after everything else, was negligible. Never heard of that
on a Class-1.
Yes the engine was built as a coal burner, but it's conversion to oil occurred either after the front end was modified with the later style smoke box door, or was made at the same time. To show the engine as it's earlier coal burner configuration would require that it had the original front end, as built, instead of the later modification.

Paul Fischer[/QUOTE]

I really think we are splitting hairs on this one. I think the 267 looks great in its current configuration, there may or may not have been some overlap there.

besides if you squint one eye and close the other the cab no. 267 looks like a 261
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×