Skip to main content

 I know they're are a lot of ways that a board can get shorted out. I just can't figure why MTH doesn't put an in-line fuse on their engines? It would be simple to replace and the new automotive mini-blades are very small. They could mount one on the bottom to make change out a snap. So would it be worth it? Are they too slow? I'm thinking it would at the least, provide some level of owner serviceable protection. Are auto re-setting fuses a better option?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The ATC blade type are fast enough. The poly-fuse would be ok , also. I don't think it's the amperage, but rather it's the voltage spike that does the damage.

 

What GRJ recommends is a TVS inline with the power feed from the track power collector to absorb the voltage spike, wherever it comes from.

 

That's my take on it.

 I guess that what I was after, was protection from those times when a wire did get shorted like when they rub on the frame or get squashed when the shell is installed. I used to install a glass in-line fuse in other scales when I added DCC. I have wandered away from that in O scale DCS installs and think I should go back to it.

 I use the TIUs in active mode even on my large G scale layouts. I'm hoping the TVS inside will do the job. Maybe I should add a TVS and a fuse in every install????

The absolute best place for TVS protection is closest to the thing you want to protect.  While the TVS in the TIU is good, stuff that happens well away from the TIU can generate a spike that gets to the electronics of the engine.  The impedance of the track connection to the TIU for a high energy, high frequency spike is a lot more than the DC or 60hz AC impedance.  The farther away the TVS is from the protected component, the less likely it is to provide effective protection.

 

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×