Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mikado 4501 posted:

Do these engines ride at the same height as the original higher quality postwar ALCO’s? They look a bit higher to me, but maybe it’s just me seeing much more of the higher riding cheaper models in my lifetime.

Actually the postwar Alco looks slightly higher.  I took a few pictures of my 209's with the new one.   Take a look

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_1236
  • IMG_1238
Vinny26 posted:
Mikado 4501 posted:

Do these engines ride at the same height as the original higher quality postwar ALCO’s? They look a bit higher to me, but maybe it’s just me seeing much more of the higher riding cheaper models in my lifetime.

Actually the postwar Alco looks slightly higher.  I took a few pictures of my 209's with the new one.   Take a look

The poster's question asked for a comparison with the "ORIGINAL HIGHER QUALITY POSTWAR ALCO'S", not the later stamped frame version like the 209 photographed.

These engines look awkward as they are jacked up really high on their frames just like the recently produced green Alco set which had issues with its coupler rubbing on the frame because of this change.

It is supremely ironic: There are scale operators who favor can motor performance over Pullmors. Yet, those same people don't notice when a engine's already toy-like proportions get aesthetically worsened by the introduction of can motors?

GregR posted:
Vinny26 posted:
Mikado 4501 posted:

Do these engines ride at the same height as the original higher quality postwar ALCO’s? They look a bit higher to me, but maybe it’s just me seeing much more of the higher riding cheaper models in my lifetime.

Actually the postwar Alco looks slightly higher.  I took a few pictures of my 209's with the new one.   Take a look

The poster's question asked for a comparison with the "ORIGINAL HIGHER QUALITY POSTWAR ALCO'S", not the later stamped frame version like the 209 photographed.

These engines look awkward as they are jacked up really high on their frames just like the recently produced green Alco set which had issues with its coupler rubbing on the frame because of this change.

It is supremely ironic: There are scale operators who favor can motor performance over Pullmors. Yet, those same people don't notice when a engine's already toy-like proportions get aesthetically worsened by the introduction of can motors?

Here is a side by side comparison with the quality postwar Alco.  A 2023 from 1951.   Look the same to me 

Attachments

Images (3)
  • IMG_1239
  • IMG_1240
  • IMG_1241

If Williams got it correct the first time with their Golden Memories Series locomotives years ago, why does Lionel keep re issuing these cheap Alcos like the green ones and the several LCCA sets (NH & Santa Fe) that as someone posted above "Can't even pull their few cars"? This New Haven model at least seems like a step in the right direction. It's about time...

 

Hi Chris,  I am like 98.657% sure that the frame is more like the PW UP 2023,  The picture below is the green Alco, which is conventional but has the same look and feel as the Lionel Chief FAs.   One feature of the frame is that the pilot has two screws which attach it to the frame.  I may get the LionelChief Great Northern FA and swap out the shells.  So My green alco would have blue tooth.  

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×